Suppr超能文献

美国创伤外科协会器官损伤分级标准 I:脾脏、肝脏和肾脏,基于国家创伤数据库的验证

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale I: spleen, liver, and kidney, validation based on the National Trauma Data Bank.

作者信息

Tinkoff Glen, Esposito Thomas J, Reed James, Kilgo Patrick, Fildes John, Pasquale Michael, Meredith J Wayne

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):646-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.342. Epub 2008 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study attempts to validate the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scale (OIS) for spleen, liver, and kidney injuries using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB).

STUDY DESIGN

All NTDB entries with Abbreviated Injury Scale codes for spleen, liver, and kidney were classified by OIS grade. Injuries were stratified either as an isolated intraabdominal organ injury or in combination with other abdominal injuries. Isolated abdominal solid organ injuries were additionally stratified by presence of severe head injury and survival past 24 hours. The patients in each grading category were analyzed for mortality, operative rate, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, and charges incurred.

RESULTS

There were 54,148 NTDB entries (2.7%) with Abbreviated Injury Scale-coded injuries to the spleen, liver, or kidney. In 35,897, this was an isolated abdominal solid organ injury. For patients in which the solid organ in question was not the sole abdominal injury, a statistically significant increase (p < or = 0.05) in mortality, organ-specific operative rate, and hospital charges was associated with increasing OIS grade; the exception was grade VI hepatic injuries. Hospital and ICU lengths of stay did not show substantial increase with increasing OIS grade. When isolated organ injuries were examined, there were statistically significant increases (p < or = 0.05) in all outcomes variables corresponding with increasing OIS grade. Severe head injury appears to influence mortality, but none of the other outcomes variables. Patients with other intraabdominal injuries had comparable quantitative outcomes results with the isolated abdominal organ injury groups for all OIS grades.

CONCLUSIONS

This study validates and quantifies outcomes reflective of increasing injury severity associated with increasing OIS grades for specific solid organ injuries alone, and in combination with other abdominal injuries.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在利用国家创伤数据库(NTDB)验证美国创伤外科协会(AAST)的脾脏、肝脏和肾脏损伤器官损伤分级标准(OIS)。

研究设计

所有NTDB中带有脾脏、肝脏和肾脏简明损伤分级代码的记录均按照OIS分级进行分类。损伤被分为单纯性腹腔内器官损伤或合并其他腹部损伤。单纯性腹部实体器官损伤还根据是否存在严重颅脑损伤以及伤后24小时存活情况进行分层。对每个分级类别的患者进行死亡率、手术率、住院时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和费用分析。

结果

NTDB中有54148条记录(2.7%)带有脾脏、肝脏或肾脏的简明损伤分级编码损伤。其中35897例为单纯性腹部实体器官损伤。对于所讨论的实体器官并非唯一腹部损伤的患者,死亡率、器官特异性手术率和住院费用随OIS分级增加而有统计学意义的显著增加(p≤0.05);VI级肝损伤除外。住院时间和ICU住院时间并未随OIS分级增加而显著增加。当检查单纯器官损伤时,所有结局变量均随OIS分级增加而有统计学意义的显著增加(p≤0.05)。严重颅脑损伤似乎影响死亡率,但不影响其他结局变量。对于所有OIS分级,合并其他腹部损伤的患者与单纯腹部器官损伤组的定量结局结果相当。

结论

本研究验证并量化了单独特定实体器官损伤以及合并其他腹部损伤时,与OIS分级增加相关的损伤严重程度增加所反映的结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验