Suppr超能文献

理解患者在卫生系统中的伙伴关系:来自加拿大患者伙伴调查的经验教训。

Understanding patient partnership in health systems: lessons from the Canadian patient partner survey.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 7;12(9):e061465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061465.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the sociodemographic characteristics, activities, motivations, experiences, skills and challenges of patient partners working across multiple health system settings in Canada.

DESIGN

Online cross-sectional survey of self-identified patient partners.

SETTING

Patient partners in multiple jurisdictions and health system organisations.

PARTICIPANTS

603 patient partners who had drawn on their experiences with the health system as a patient, family member or informal caregiver to try to improve it in some way, through their involvement in the activities of a group, organisation or government.

RESULTS

Survey respondents predominantly identified as female (76.6%), white (84%) and university educated (70.2%) but were a heterogeneous group in the scope (activities and organisations), intensity (number of hours) and longevity (number of years) of their role. Primary motivations for becoming a patient partner were the desire to improve the health system based on either a negative (36.2%) or positive (23.3%) experience. Respondents reported feeling enthusiastic (83.6%), valued (76.9%) and needed (63.3%) always or most of the time; just under half felt they had always or often been adequately compensated in their role. Knowledge of the health system and the organisation they partner with are key skills needed. Two-thirds faced barriers in their role with over half identifying power imbalances. Less than half were able to see how their input was reflected in decisions or changes always or most of the time, and 40.3% had thought about quitting.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey is the first of its kind to examine at a population level, the characteristics, experiences and dynamics of a large sample of self-identified patient partners. Patient partners in this sample are a sociodemographically homogenous group, yet heterogeneous in the scope, intensity and longevity of roles. Our findings provide key insights at a critical time, to inform the future of patient partnership in health systems.

摘要

目的

考察加拿大多个卫生系统环境中从事工作的患者伙伴的社会人口学特征、活动、动机、经验、技能和挑战。

设计

自我认定的患者伙伴在线横断面调查。

设置

多个司法管辖区和卫生系统组织中的患者伙伴。

参与者

603 名患者伙伴,他们通过参与团体、组织或政府的活动,利用自己作为患者、家庭成员或非正式照顾者的经验,试图以某种方式改善卫生系统,从而在某种程度上使卫生系统受益。

结果

调查受访者主要为女性(76.6%)、白人(84%)和受过大学教育(70.2%),但在其角色的范围(活动和组织)、强度(小时数)和持续时间(年数)方面,他们是一个多样化的群体。成为患者伙伴的主要动机是基于负面(36.2%)或正面(23.3%)经验来改善卫生系统的愿望。受访者报告说,他们总是或大多数时候感到热情(83.6%)、有价值(76.9%)和需要(63.3%);近一半的人认为他们在角色中总是或经常得到充分补偿。了解卫生系统和他们合作的组织是他们所需的关键技能。三分之二的人在他们的角色中面临障碍,超过一半的人认为存在权力失衡。不到一半的人能够总是或大多数时候看到他们的投入如何反映在决策或变革中,40.3%的人曾考虑过辞职。

结论

这项调查是首例从人群水平上考察大量自我认定的患者伙伴的特征、经验和动态的调查。该样本中的患者伙伴在社会人口学上是同质的,但在角色的范围、强度和持续时间上是异质的。我们的研究结果在关键时刻提供了关键的见解,为未来的卫生系统中的患者伙伴关系提供了信息。

相似文献

1
Understanding patient partnership in health systems: lessons from the Canadian patient partner survey.
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 7;12(9):e061465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061465.
6
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
7
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Patient advocate perspectives on involvement in HTA: an international snapshot.
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 10;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0052-9. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing patient-led research and establishing a national IBD patient partner network in Canada: a call to action.
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 20;8(4):117-119. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwaf014. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Patient engagement strategies in digital health interventions for cancer survivors: A scoping review.
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 30;4(5):e0000871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000871. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Barriers and Facilitators of Patient Engagement Activities to Improve Patient Safety in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi-Based Expert Survey.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Dec 19;17:3217-3226. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S489522. eCollection 2024.
5
Patient Partner Perspectives: The Experience of Participating in a Co-Designed Virtual Reality Project.
J Patient Exp. 2024 Dec 12;11:23743735241302932. doi: 10.1177/23743735241302932. eCollection 2024.
8
Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Pediatric Populations: A Narrative Review.
Children (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;11(10):1266. doi: 10.3390/children11101266.
9
Recruiting for Engagement in Health Policy.
Healthc Policy. 2024 Sep;20(SP):36-47. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27415.

本文引用的文献

3
Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs).
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):148-158. doi: 10.1111/hex.12983. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement.
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):709-720. doi: 10.1111/hex.12942. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
6
Rethinking engagement.
BJPsych Bull. 2019 Feb;43(1):4-7. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2018.55. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
7
Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Councils in Health Care and Research: a Systematic Review.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1292-1303. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4565-9. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
8
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z.
9
Dilemmas of Representation: Patient Engagement in Health Professions Education.
Acad Med. 2018 Jun;93(6):869-873. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001971.
10
Let the patient revolution begin.
BMJ. 2013 May 14;346:f2614. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2614.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验