• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解患者的动机:一个共同设计的项目,旨在了解患者参与背后的因素。

Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement.

作者信息

McCarron Tamara L, Noseworthy Thomas, Moffat Karen, Wilkinson Gloria, Zelinsky Sandra, White Deborah, Hassay Derek, Lorenzetti Diane L, Marlett Nancy J

机构信息

The Department Community Health Sciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):709-720. doi: 10.1111/hex.12942. Epub 2019 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12942
PMID:31379094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6737762/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large-scale transformation depends on effective engagement of diverse stakeholders. With the evolution of the role of the 'patient partner' in health-care decision making, understanding the motivations of these individuals is essential to the success of engagement initiatives. This study reports on motivational factors associated with patient engagement in health care.

METHODS

Patient co-investigators and a researcher co-designed and conducted this study. A survey was administered to patients and family members. Key informant interviews and previous research informed the development of the survey tool. The survey data were analysed using exploratory factor analysis to identify the underlying dimensions in the data. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine reliability.

RESULTS

A total of 1449 individuals participated in the survey. Of these, 543 completed and 427 partially completed the survey (67% complete rate). The mean age of the respondents was 54 years. The majority of participants were female, well-educated, retired, married and lived in an urban centre. Seven motivational factors explained 65% of the total variance. Analysis of internal consistency revealed acceptable reliability for all items. The seven motivations were as follows: Self-fulfillment, Improving Healthcare, Compensation, Influence, Learning New Things, Conditional and Perks.

CONCLUSION

The results of this research describe a sample of patient and family members currently engaged with health systems. We identified seven motivational factors underlying their engagement. A deeper knowledge of volunteer motivations will not only create meaningful engagement opportunities for patients, but also enable health organizations to gain from the experience of these individuals, thereby enhancing quality and sustainability of patient engagement programmes.

摘要

背景

大规模变革取决于不同利益相关者的有效参与。随着“患者伙伴”在医疗保健决策中角色的演变,了解这些人的动机对于参与计划的成功至关重要。本研究报告了与患者参与医疗保健相关的动机因素。

方法

患者共同研究者和一名研究人员共同设计并开展了这项研究。对患者和家庭成员进行了一项调查。关键 informant 访谈和先前的研究为调查工具的开发提供了信息。使用探索性因素分析对调查数据进行分析,以确定数据中的潜在维度。使用 Cronbach's alpha 来确定可靠性。

结果

共有 1449 人参与了调查。其中,543 人完成了调查,427 人部分完成了调查(完成率为 67%)。受访者的平均年龄为 54 岁。大多数参与者为女性,受过良好教育,已退休,已婚且居住在城市中心。七个动机因素解释了总方差的 65%。内部一致性分析显示所有项目的可靠性均可接受。这七个动机如下:自我实现、改善医疗保健、补偿、影响、学习新事物、条件和福利。

结论

本研究结果描述了当前参与卫生系统的患者和家庭成员样本。我们确定了他们参与背后的七个动机因素。更深入地了解志愿者动机不仅将为患者创造有意义的参与机会,还将使卫生组织从这些人的经验中受益,从而提高患者参与计划的质量和可持续性。

相似文献

1
Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement.了解患者的动机:一个共同设计的项目,旨在了解患者参与背后的因素。
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):709-720. doi: 10.1111/hex.12942. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
2
A co-designed framework to support and sustain patient and family engagement in health-care decision making.支持和维持患者和家属参与医疗决策的共同设计框架。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):825-836. doi: 10.1111/hex.13054. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
3
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
4
Motivation for patient engagement in patient safety: a multi-perspective, explorative survey.患者参与患者安全的动机:多视角、探索性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1052. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11495-x.
5
Bringing Value-Based Perspectives to Care: Including Patient and Family Members in Decision-Making Processes.将价值为基础的观点引入医疗照护:让患者及其家属参与决策过程。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Nov 1;6(11):661-668. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.27.
6
What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?患者及其家属作为研究团队的合作伙伴,什么样的参与才算有意义?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):158-167. doi: 10.1177/1355819618762960. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
7
Determining the motivations of family members to undertake cardiopulmonary resuscitation training through grounded theory.运用扎根理论确定家庭成员进行心肺复苏培训的动机。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Apr;75(4):834-849. doi: 10.1111/jan.13923. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Patient family advisors' perspectives on engagement in health-care quality improvement initiatives: Power and partnership.患者家属顾问对参与医疗质量改进计划的看法:权力与合作。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):379-386. doi: 10.1111/hex.12633. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Supporting the evaluation of public and patient engagement in health system organizations: Results from an implementation research study.支持对卫生系统组织中公众和患者参与的评估:实施研究的结果。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1132-1143. doi: 10.1111/hex.12949. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
10
Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review.理解患者在卫生系统决策中的参与:一项共同设计的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 18;8(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0994-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Iterative Situated Engagement Perspective: Meaning-Making Challenges Across Cancer Screening Phases.迭代情境参与视角:癌症筛查各阶段的意义构建挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 16;17(12):2007. doi: 10.3390/cancers17122007.
2
Vibrotactile Stimulation in Lower Extremity Amputation Patients Using a Noninvasive Vibration Device: A Pilot Study.使用非侵入性振动装置对下肢截肢患者进行振动触觉刺激:一项初步研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 May 19;13(5):e6788. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006788. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Supporting the continuous development and use of a patient partnership framework in European rare disease networks (ERNs): a scoping review of frameworks in the scientific literature.支持欧洲罕见病网络(ERNs)中患者伙伴关系框架的持续发展与应用:对科学文献中框架的范围综述
J Community Genet. 2025 Feb;16(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00763-2. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
4
Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.确定患者合作伙伴在研究团队中的角色:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00664-1.
5
Patient Partner Perspectives: The Experience of Participating in a Co-Designed Virtual Reality Project.患者合作伙伴视角:参与共同设计的虚拟现实项目的体验
J Patient Exp. 2024 Dec 12;11:23743735241302932. doi: 10.1177/23743735241302932. eCollection 2024.
6
Bridging the Gap: Understanding Patient and Clinician Preferences When Designing Preoperative Education Programs.弥合差距:在设计术前教育项目时了解患者和临床医生的偏好
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14259. doi: 10.1111/jep.14259.
7
Patient and Public Involvement Work With Parents of Children With Life-Limiting Conditions and Bereaved Parents: A Rapid Systematic Review.与患有危及生命疾病儿童的父母及丧亲父母开展患者及公众参与工作:一项快速系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70120. doi: 10.1111/hex.70120.
8
Am I attached? A patient-partnered approach to creating infographics about attachment to primary care in Ontario, Canada.我是否有归属感?一种由患者参与的方法,用于制作关于加拿大安大略省对初级医疗保健归属感的信息图表。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Nov 4;10(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00652-5.
9
Patient motivation: A concept analysis.患者动机:一项概念分析。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Oct 14;10(5):490-497. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3529. eCollection 2024.
10
Motivation for patient engagement in patient safety: a multi-perspective, explorative survey.患者参与患者安全的动机:多视角、探索性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1052. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11495-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review.理解患者在卫生系统决策中的参与:一项共同设计的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 18;8(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0994-8.
2
Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.面向患者、医疗保健提供者、决策者和研究人员的健康患者导向研究能力(PORCH):系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0762-1.
3
What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?患者及其家属作为研究团队的合作伙伴,什么样的参与才算有意义?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):158-167. doi: 10.1177/1355819618762960. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
4
Patient and family engagement in Alberta Health Services: Improving care delivery and research outcomes.艾伯塔省医疗服务中的患者及家庭参与:改善医疗服务提供与研究成果
Healthc Manage Forum. 2018 Mar;31(2):57-61. doi: 10.1177/0840470417747003.
5
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.
6
An integrative formal model of motivation and decision making: The MGPM*.动机与决策的综合形式模型:MGPM*。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Sep;101(9):1240-65. doi: 10.1037/apl0000121. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
7
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.从象征主义到赋权:推动患者及公众参与医疗保健改善
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
8
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
9
Impact on the individual: what do patients and carers gain, lose and expect from being involved in research?对个人的影响:患者和护理人员参与研究能获得什么、失去什么以及期望得到什么?
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):28-35. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101424. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
10
A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare.患者参与医疗保健的可靠和有效工具的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Feb;25(2):110-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004357. Epub 2015 Sep 28.