Centre for the Study of Decision-Making Uncertainty, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 7;12(9):e051352. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051352.
To examine the impact of the government communicating uncertainties relating to COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness on vaccination intention and trust after people are exposed to conflicting information.
Experimental design where participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups.
Online.
328 adults from a UK research panel.
Participants received either certain or uncertain communications from a government representative about COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, before receiving conflicting information about effectiveness.
Vaccination intention and trust in government.
Compared with those who received the uncertain announcement from the government, participants who received the certain announcement reported a greater loss of vaccination intention (d0.34, 95% CI (0.12 to 0.56), p=0.002) and trust (d0.34, 95% CI (0.12 to 0.56), p=0.002) after receiving conflicting information.
Communicating with certainty about COVID-19 vaccines reduces vaccination intention and trust if conflicting information arises, whereas communicating uncertainties can protect people from the negative impact of exposure to conflicting information. There are likely to be other factors affecting vaccine intentions, which we do not account for in this study.
Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/c73px/.
研究在人们接触到相互矛盾的信息后,政府就 COVID-19 疫苗有效性传达不确定性对疫苗接种意愿和信任的影响。
参与者被随机分配到两组的实验设计。
线上。
来自英国研究小组的 328 名成年人。
参与者在收到有关疫苗有效性的相互矛盾的信息之前,分别从政府代表那里收到了关于 COVID-19 疫苗有效性的确定性或不确定性信息。
疫苗接种意愿和对政府的信任。
与那些收到政府不确定公告的参与者相比,在收到相互矛盾的信息后,收到政府确定性公告的参与者报告称,疫苗接种意愿(d0.34,95%置信区间(0.12 至 0.56),p=0.002)和对政府的信任(d0.34,95%置信区间(0.12 至 0.56),p=0.002)明显下降。
如果出现相互矛盾的信息,对 COVID-19 疫苗进行确定性沟通会降低疫苗接种意愿和信任,而传达不确定性则可以保护人们免受接触相互矛盾信息的负面影响。在这项研究中,我们没有考虑到可能影响疫苗接种意愿的其他因素。
开放科学框架:https://osf.io/c73px/。