Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre: A Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Urology Department, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz, Iran.
Scand J Surg. 2023 Jun;112(2):105-116. doi: 10.1177/14574969221145774. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
PURPOSE: Management of nephrolithiasis is unique in pregnancy and requires multidisciplinary care. To identify the effectiveness or safety of temporary drainage or definitive treatment methods to manage urolithiasis in pregnancy. METHODS: The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies was conducted in August 2021. Studies published in any language on any date were considered for inclusion. RESULTS: Of a total of 3349 publications, 36 studies were included in our qualitative evaluation and 32 studies in the quantitative synthesis. The commonly reported method was stent insertion ( = 29 studies), pneumatic ( = 12), laser ( = 9) lithotripsy, and stone removal using any devices (basket, grasper, or forceps) ( = 11). In seven studies, the authors reported the outcomes of conservative management, and the results showed that the stone-free rate is 54%, and symptom relief occurred in 62% of women. Seven eligible studies reported that 79.9% of urolithiasis were expulsed through stent insertion, while this rate was 94.6% among percutaneous nephrostomy use in two included studies, 88.5% for pneumatic lithotripsy ( = 7 studies), and 76.4% for laser lithotripsy ( = 4 studies), or 95.4% for stone removal method. In addition, adverse events were reported in less than 10% of pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that stent, pneumatic or laser lithotripsy, and ureteroscopic stone removal were the commonest used methods in the included studies. They can be effective and safe treatment approaches without major maternal or neonatal complications, and could be introduced as an effective and safe therapeutic method for urolithiasis during pregnancy. However, most of the included studies had moderate quality according to critical appraisal checklists. Further prospective studies are needed to reach a conclusion.
目的:肾结石的治疗在妊娠期间具有独特性,需要多学科的护理。本研究旨在确定临时引流或明确治疗方法在管理妊娠期间尿石症的有效性或安全性。
方法:该研究于 2021 年 8 月进行了搜索策略,旨在寻找已发表和未发表的研究。纳入了所有语言、所有日期发表的研究。
结果:在总共 3349 篇文献中,有 36 项研究纳入了我们的定性评估,32 项研究纳入了定量综合分析。报告最多的方法是支架置入术(=29 项研究)、气压弹道碎石术(=12 项)、激光碎石术(=9 项)以及使用任何设备(篮子、抓钳或镊子)取石(=11 项)。在 7 项研究中,作者报告了保守治疗的结果,结果显示无石率为 54%,62%的女性症状缓解。7 项符合条件的研究报告称,79.9%的尿石症通过支架置入术排出,而在 2 项纳入研究中经皮肾造瘘术的排出率为 94.6%,气压弹道碎石术为 88.5%(=7 项研究),激光碎石术为 76.4%(=4 项研究),或取石方法为 95.4%。此外,不到 10%的孕妇出现不良事件。
结论:结果表明,支架置入术、气压弹道碎石术或激光碎石术以及输尿管镜取石术是纳入研究中最常用的方法。这些方法对母婴均安全有效,且无严重并发症,可作为妊娠期间尿石症的有效治疗方法。然而,根据批判性评价检查表,纳入的大多数研究质量为中等。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来得出结论。
Scand J Surg. 2023-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-2
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-5-16