Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, NC, USA.
Public Health and Integrated Toxicology Division, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, NC, USA.
Inhal Toxicol. 2023 May-Jun;35(5-6):129-138. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2023.2169416. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
Inhalation of smoke from the burning of waste materials on military bases is associated with increased incidences of cardiopulmonary diseases. This study examined the respiratory and inflammatory effects of acute inhalation exposures in mice to smoke generated by military burn pit-related materials including plywood (PW), cardboard (CB), mixed plastics (PL), and a mixture of these three materials (MX) under smoldering (0.84 MCE) and flaming (0.97 MCE) burn conditions.
Mice were exposed nose-only for one hour on two consecutive days to whole or filtered smoke or clean air alone. Smoldering combustion emissions had greater concentrations of PM (∼40 mg/m) and VOCs (∼5-12 ppmv) than flaming emissions (∼4 mg/m and ∼1-2 ppmv, respectively); filtered emissions had equivalent levels of VOCs with negligible PM. Breathing parameters were assessed during exposure by head-out plethysmography.
All four smoldering burn pit emission types reduced breathing frequency (F) and minute volumes (MV) compared with baseline exposures to clean air, and HEPA filtration significantly reduced the effects of all smoldering materials except CB. Flaming emissions had significantly less suppression of F and MV compared with smoldering conditions. No acute effects on lung inflammatory cells, cytokines, lung injury markers, or hematology parameters were noted in smoke-exposed mice compared with air controls, likely due to reduced respiration and upper respiratory scrubbing to reduce the total deposited PM dose in this short-term exposure.
Our data suggest that material and combustion type influences respiratory responses to burn pit combustion emissions. Furthermore, PM filtration provides significant protective effects only for certain material types.
燃烧军事基地废物产生的烟雾吸入与心肺疾病发病率的增加有关。本研究在亚慢性( 0.84 MCE )和慢性( 0.97 MCE )燃烧条件下,检查了小鼠急性吸入暴露于军事燃烧坑相关材料(包括胶合板( PW )、硬纸板( CB )、混合塑料( PL )和这三种材料的混合物( MX ))产生的烟雾对呼吸和炎症的影响。
在连续两天内,小鼠仅通过鼻子暴露于全烟或过滤烟或清洁空气 1 小时。闷烧燃烧排放物的 PM (约 40mg/m )和 VOCs (约 5-12ppmv )浓度高于火焰燃烧排放物(分别约为 4mg/m 和约 1-2ppmv );过滤排放物具有等效水平的 VOCs ,且 PM 可忽略不计。通过头出式 plethysmography 在暴露期间评估呼吸参数。
与暴露于清洁空气的基线相比,所有四种闷烧燃烧坑排放类型均降低了呼吸频率( F )和分钟通气量( MV ),而高效微粒空气( HEPA )过滤显著降低了除 CB 以外的所有闷烧材料的影响。与闷烧条件相比,火焰燃烧排放物对 F 和 MV 的抑制作用明显较小。与空气对照组相比,暴露于烟雾的小鼠的肺炎症细胞、细胞因子、肺损伤标志物或血液学参数均无明显的急性影响,这可能是由于呼吸减少和上呼吸道冲洗,从而减少了这种短期暴露的总沉积 PM 剂量。
我们的数据表明,材料和燃烧类型会影响对燃烧坑燃烧排放物的呼吸反应。此外,PM 过滤仅对某些材料类型提供显著的保护作用。