Pauluhn Juergen, Whalan John E
Covestro Deutschland AG, Global Phosgene Steering Group, 51365, Leverkusen, Germany; Bayer HealthCare, Wuppertal, Germany.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20460, USA.
Toxicology. 2021 Oct;462:152929. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152929. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
Contemporary approaches to human health risk assessment for respiratory tract irritants are variable and controversial. This manuscript provides an in-depth analysis and assessment of the applicability of the classical respiratory depression 50 % (RD) assay with focus on the Log-linear extrapolation of the non-sensory irritant threshold (RD or RD) relative to the contemporary Point of Departure (POD) U.S.-EPA benchmark approach. Three prototypic volatile chemically reactive irritants are used to exemplify the pros and cons of this alternative approach. These irritants differ in physicochemical properties affecting water-solubility and lipophilicity. Depending on these variables, a vapor may preferentially be retained in the extrathoracic region (ET), the tracheobronchial region (TB), and the pulmonary region (PU); although a smooth transition between these regions occurs at increasingly high concentrations. Each region has its specific nociceptors sensing irritants and regional-specific response to injury. The alternative approach using rats identified the chemical-specific critical region of respiratory tract injury. Statistically derived PODs on ET-TB related sensory irritation provide important information for ET-TB irritants but not for PU irritants. The POD of ET-TB irritants from acute and repeated studies decreased substantially. In summary, statistically derived PODs improve the risk assessment of respiratory tract irritants; however, those from repeated exposures should be given preference to those from acute exposures.
当代对呼吸道刺激物进行人体健康风险评估的方法各不相同且存在争议。本手稿对经典的呼吸抑制50%(RD)试验的适用性进行了深入分析和评估,重点关注相对于当代出发值(POD)美国环境保护局基准方法的非感官刺激阈值(RD或RD)的对数线性外推。使用三种典型的挥发性化学反应性刺激物来举例说明这种替代方法的优缺点。这些刺激物在影响水溶性和亲脂性的物理化学性质方面存在差异。根据这些变量,蒸汽可能优先保留在胸外区域(ET)、气管支气管区域(TB)和肺部区域(PU);尽管在浓度越来越高时,这些区域之间会发生平滑过渡。每个区域都有其特定的伤害感受器来感知刺激物以及对损伤的区域特异性反应。使用大鼠的替代方法确定了呼吸道损伤的化学特异性关键区域。从统计学上得出的关于ET-TB相关感觉刺激的POD为ET-TB刺激物提供了重要信息,但对PU刺激物则不然。急性和重复研究中ET-TB刺激物的POD大幅下降。总之,从统计学上得出的POD改进了呼吸道刺激物的风险评估;然而,重复暴露得出的POD应优先于急性暴露得出的POD。