Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Helsinki, and HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Linko Q-Solutions, FIN-00950 Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Chim Acta. 2023 Feb 1;540:117233. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117233. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
The biological (CV), preanalytical (CV), and analytical variation (CV) are inherent to clinical laboratory testing and consequently, interpretation of clinical test results.
The sum of the CV, CV, and CV, called diagnostic variation (CV), was used to derive clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications (CAAPS) for clinical chemistry measurands. The reference change concept was applied to clinically significant differences (CD) between two measurements, with the formula CD = z*√2* CV. CD for six measurands were sought from international guidelines. The CAAPS were calculated by subtracting variances of CV and CV from CV. Modified formulae were applied to consider statistical power (1-β) and repeated measurements.
The obtained CAAPS were 44.9% for urine albumin, 0.6% for plasma sodium, 22.9% for plasma pancreatic amylase, and 8.0% for plasma creatinine (z = 3, α = 2.5%, 1-β = 85%). For blood HbA and plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, replicate measurements were necessary to reach CAAPS for patient monitoring. The derived CAAPS were compared with analytical performance specifications, APS, based on biological variation.
The CAAPS models pose a new tool for assessing APS in a clinical laboratory. Their usability depends on the relevance of CD limits, required statistical power and the feasibility of repeated measurements.
生物学(CV)、分析前(CV)和分析(CV)变异是临床实验室检测固有的,因此也是临床检验结果解释所固有的。
将 CV、CV 和 CV 的总和称为诊断变异(CV),用于得出临床化学测定物可接受的分析性能规格(CAAPS)。参考变化概念应用于两次测量之间的临床显著差异(CD),公式为 CD = z*√2*CV。从国际指南中寻求了六个测定物的 CD。通过从 CV 中减去 CV 和 CV 的方差来计算 CAAPS。应用修正公式考虑统计功效(1-β)和重复测量。
得到的 CAAPS 分别为:尿白蛋白 44.9%,血浆钠 0.6%,血浆胰淀粉酶 22.9%,血浆肌酐 8.0%(z = 3,α = 2.5%,1-β = 85%)。对于血液 HbA 和血浆低密度脂蛋白胆固醇,需要重复测量才能达到患者监测的 CAAPS。将得出的 CAAPS 与基于生物学变异的分析性能规格(APS)进行了比较。
CAAPS 模型为评估临床实验室中的 APS 提供了一种新工具。其可用性取决于 CD 限值的相关性、所需的统计功效和重复测量的可行性。