• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期疾病患者实验室检测的差异:英国初级医疗中的一项纵向队列研究

Variation in laboratory testing for patients with long-term conditions: a longitudinal cohort study in UK primary care.

作者信息

Jones Timothy, Patel Rita, Elwenspoek Martha M C, Watson Jessica C, Mann Ed, Alsop Katharine, Whiting Penny F

机构信息

The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2023 Mar 21;7(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0139. Print 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0139
PMID:36693759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10354328/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of laboratory testing has increased in the UK over the past few decades, with considerable geographical variation.

AIM

To evaluate what laboratory tests are used to monitor people with hypertension, type 2 (T2) diabetes, or chronic kidney disease (CKD) and assess variation in test use in UK primary care.

DESIGN & SETTING: Longitudinal cohort study of people registered with UK general practices between June 2013 and May 2018 and previously diagnosed with hypertension, T2 diabetes, or CKD.

METHOD

Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) primary care data linked to ethnic group and deprivation was used to examine testing rates over time, by GP practice, age, sex, ethnic group, and socioeconomic deprivation, with age-sex standardisation.

RESULTS

Nearly 1 million patients were included, and more than 27 million tests. The most ordered tests were for renal function (1463 per 1000 person-years), liver function (1063 per 1000 person-years), and full blood count (FBC; 996 per 1000 person-years). There was evidence of undertesting (compared with current guidelines) for HbA1c and albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) or microalbumin, and potential overtesting of lipids, FBC, liver function, and thyroid function. Some GP practices had up to 27 times higher testing rates than others (HbA1c testing among patients with CKD).

CONCLUSION

Testing rates are no longer increasing, but they are not always within the guidelines for monitoring long-term conditions (LTCs). There was considerable variation by GP practice, indicating uncertainty over the most appropriate testing frequencies for different conditions. Standardising the monitoring of LTCs based on the latest evidence would provide greater consistency of access to monitoring tests.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年中,英国实验室检测的使用有所增加,且存在显著的地域差异。

目的

评估用于监测高血压、2型(T2)糖尿病或慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的实验室检测项目,并评估英国初级医疗中检测项目使用情况的差异。

设计与设置

对2013年6月至2018年5月期间在英国全科诊所注册且先前被诊断患有高血压、T2糖尿病或CKD的患者进行纵向队列研究。

方法

利用与种族和贫困程度相关联的临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)初级医疗数据,按全科医生诊所、年龄、性别、种族和社会经济贫困程度,对随时间变化的检测率进行年龄 - 性别标准化检查。

结果

纳入了近100万名患者,进行了超过2700万次检测。最常开具的检测项目是肾功能(每1000人年1463次)、肝功能(每1000人年1063次)和全血细胞计数(FBC;每1000人年996次)。有证据表明糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和白蛋白:肌酐比值(ACR)或微量白蛋白检测不足(与现行指南相比),而血脂、FBC、肝功能和甲状腺功能检测可能存在过度。一些全科医生诊所的检测率比其他诊所高出多达27倍(CKD患者中的HbA1c检测)。

结论

检测率不再上升,但并不总是在长期疾病(LTCs)监测指南范围内。全科医生诊所之间存在相当大的差异,表明对于不同病症最合适的检测频率存在不确定性。根据最新证据对LTCs监测进行标准化将使监测检测的获取更加一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/10354328/d4eed66433fb/bjgpopen-7-0139-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/10354328/4bb811f41d74/bjgpopen-7-0139-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/10354328/78116e13250d/bjgpopen-7-0139-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/10354328/d4eed66433fb/bjgpopen-7-0139-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/10354328/4bb811f41d74/bjgpopen-7-0139-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/10354328/78116e13250d/bjgpopen-7-0139-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/10354328/d4eed66433fb/bjgpopen-7-0139-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Variation in laboratory testing for patients with long-term conditions: a longitudinal cohort study in UK primary care.长期疾病患者实验室检测的差异:英国初级医疗中的一项纵向队列研究
BJGP Open. 2023 Mar 21;7(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0139. Print 2023 Mar.
2
3
Occurrence of fertility problems presenting to primary care: population-level estimates of clinical burden and socioeconomic inequalities across the UK.初级保健中出现的生育问题:英国临床负担和社会经济不平等的人群水平估计。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;28(4):960-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des451. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
4
Electronically delivered interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections in primary care: cluster RCT using electronic health records and cohort study.电子干预措施减少初级保健中呼吸道感染抗生素处方:使用电子健康记录的群组 RCT 和队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(11):1-70. doi: 10.3310/hta23110.
5
Long term condition morbidity in English general practice: a cross-sectional study using three composite morbidity measures.英国全科医疗中的长期病症发病率:一项使用三种综合发病率指标的横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Nov 29;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0563-3.
6
Quality of Chronic Kidney Disease Management in Canadian Primary Care.加拿大初级保健中慢性肾脏病管理的质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910704. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10704.
7
Trends in the full blood count blood test and colorectal cancer detection: a longitudinal, case-control study of UK primary care patient data.全血细胞计数血液检测趋势与结直肠癌检测:一项对英国初级医疗患者数据的纵向病例对照研究。
NIHR Open Res. 2022 Oct 18;2:32. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13266.2. eCollection 2022.
8
Disparities in glycaemic control, monitoring, and treatment of type 2 diabetes in England: A retrospective cohort analysis.英格兰 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制、监测和治疗的差异:一项回顾性队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 7;16(10):e1002942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002942. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Using electronic medical record data to assess chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease testing, recognition and management as documented in Australian general practice: a cross-sectional analysis.利用电子病历数据评估澳大利亚全科医疗中慢性肾脏病、2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病的检测、识别和管理情况:一项横断面分析。
Fam Med Community Health. 2022 Feb;10(1). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001006.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and predictors of sub-optimal laboratory monitoring of selected higher risk medicines in Irish general practice: a 5-year retrospective cohort study of community-dwelling older adults.爱尔兰全科医疗中特定高风险药物实验室监测未达最佳标准的患病率及预测因素:一项针对社区居住老年人的5年回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e086446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086446.
2
The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2023: an editorial.《英国全科医学杂志·开放版》2023年十大最受关注研究文章:一篇社论
BJGP Open. 2024 Apr 25;8(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0042. Print 2024 Apr.
3
Liver function tests in patients with hypertension in primary care: a prospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
GP's perspectives on laboratory test use for monitoring long-term conditions: an audit of current testing practice.全科医生对用于监测长期疾病的实验室检测的看法:当前检测实践的审计。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 5;21(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01331-6.
2
Your results may vary: the imprecision of medical measurements.您的结果可能会有所不同:医学测量的不精确性。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 20;368:m149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m149.
3
Are guidelines for monitoring chronic disease in primary care evidence based?基层医疗中慢性病监测指南是否基于证据?
基层医疗中高血压患者的肝功能检查:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BJGP Open. 2024 Apr 25;8(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0082. Print 2024 Apr.
BMJ. 2019 Jun 13;365:l2319. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2319.
4
Optimising laboratory monitoring of chronic conditions in primary care: a quality improvement framework.优化基层医疗中慢性病的实验室监测:一个质量改进框架。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Mar 29;8(1):e000349. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000349. eCollection 2019.
5
Temporal trends in use of tests in UK primary care, 2000-15: retrospective analysis of 250 million tests.英国初级保健中检测的使用趋势,2000-15 年:2.5 亿次检测的回顾性分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4666. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4666.
6
What do tests do for doctors? A qualitative study of blood testing in UK primary care.检查对医生有什么作用?英国初级医疗中血液检查的定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2017 Nov 16;34(6):735-739. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx051.
7
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.使用常规收集的健康数据进行研究的报告(RECORD)声明
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 6;12(10):e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. eCollection 2015 Oct.
8
Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv098. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
9
Temporal growth and geographic variation in the use of laboratory tests by NHS general practices: using routine data to identify research priorities.NHS 全科医生实验室检测的时间增长和地域差异:利用常规数据确定研究重点。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Apr;63(609):e256-66. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X665224.
10
Monitoring cholesterol levels: measurement error or true change?监测胆固醇水平:测量误差还是真实变化?
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 6;148(9):656-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-9-200805060-00005.