Suppr超能文献

肺超声评估新型冠状病毒肺炎插管患者在实施肺复张手法及俯卧位通气时的通气变化:初步研究

Lung ultrasound to evaluate aeration changes in response to recruitment maneuver and prone positioning in intubated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: preliminary study.

作者信息

Cammarota Gianmaria, Bruni Andrea, Morettini Giulio, Vitali Leonardo, Brunelli Francesco, Tinarelli Filippo, Simonte Rachele, Rossi Elisa, Bellucci Matteo, De Girolamo Giacomo, Galzerano Antonio, Vetrugno Luigi, Maggiore Salvatore M, Bignami Elena, Azzolina Danila, Dow Olivia, Navalesi Paolo, De Robertis Edoardo

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Anestesia and Intensive Care Service 2, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Ultrasound J. 2023 Jan 25;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13089-023-00306-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This single-center preliminary prospective observational study used bedside ultrasound to assess the lung aeration modifications induced by recruitment maneuver and pronation in intubated patients with acute respiratory disease syndrome (ARDS) related to coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). All adult intubated COVID-19 patients suitable for pronation were screened. After enrollment, patients underwent 1 h in a volume-controlled mode in supine position (baseline) followed by a 35-cmHO-recruitment maneuver of 2 min (recruitment). Final step involved volume-controlled mode in prone position set as at baseline (pronation). At the end of the first two steps and 1 h after pronation, a lung ultrasound was performed, and global and regional lung ultrasound score (LUS) were analyzed. Data sets are presented as a median and 25th-75th percentile.

RESULTS

From January to May 2022, 20 patients were included and analyzed. Global LUS reduced from 26.5 (23.5-30.0) at baseline to 21.5 (18.0-23.3) and 23.0 (21.0-26.3) at recruitment (p < 0.001) and pronation (p = 0.004). In the anterior lung regions, the regional LUS were 1.8 (1.1-2.0) following recruitment and 2.0 (1.6-2.2) in the supine (p = 0.008) and 2.0 (1.8-2.3) in prone position (p = 0.023). Regional LUS diminished from 2.3 (2.0-2.5) in supine to 2.0 (1.8-2.0) with recruitment in the lateral lung zones (p = 0.036). Finally, in the posterior lung units, regional LUS improved from 2.5 (2.3-2.8) in supine to 2.3 (1.8-2.5) through recruitment (p = 0.003) and 1.8 (1.3-2.2) with pronation (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our investigation, recruitment maneuver and prone positioning demonstrated an enhancement in lung aeration when compared to supine position, as assessed by bedside lung ultrasound.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov , Number NCT05209477, prospectively registered and released on 01/26/2022.

摘要

背景

本单中心初步前瞻性观察性研究使用床旁超声评估了2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的插管患者中,肺复张手法和俯卧位所引起的肺通气改变。对所有适合俯卧位的成年COVID-19插管患者进行了筛查。入组后,患者先在仰卧位以容量控制模式接受1小时(基线),随后进行2分钟的35厘米水柱肺复张手法(肺复张)。最后一步是在俯卧位设置为与基线相同的容量控制模式(俯卧位)。在前两步结束时以及俯卧位1小时后,进行一次肺部超声检查,并分析整体和区域肺部超声评分(LUS)。数据集以中位数和第25至75百分位数表示。

结果

2022年1月至5月,纳入并分析了20例患者。整体LUS从基线时的26.5(23.5 - 30.0)降至肺复张时的21.5(18.0 - 23.3)和俯卧位时的23.0(21.0 - 26.3)(p < 0.001)和(p = 0.004)。在前肺区域,肺复张后区域LUS为1.8(1.1 - 2.0),仰卧位时为2.0(1.6 - 2.2)(p = 0.008),俯卧位时为2.0(1.8 - 2.3)(p = 0.023)。区域LUS在侧肺区域从仰卧位的2.3(2.0 - 2.5)降至肺复张时的2.0(1.8 - 2.0)(p = 0.036)。最后,在后肺单位,区域LUS通过肺复张从仰卧位的2.5(2.3 - 2.8)改善至2.3(1.8 - 2.5)(p = 0.003),俯卧位时为1.8(1.3 - 2.2)(p < 0.0001)。

结论

在我们的研究中,通过床旁肺部超声评估,与仰卧位相比,肺复张手法和俯卧位显示出肺通气的改善。

试验注册

www.CLINICALTRIALS.gov,编号NCT05209477,前瞻性注册并于2022年1月26日发布。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735e/9873848/d428626d4964/13089_2023_306_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

4
Lung ultrasonography for assessment of oxygenation response to prone position ventilation in ARDS.
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1546-1556. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4411-7. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
5
Pronation Reveals a Heterogeneous Response of Global and Regional Respiratory Mechanics in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Oct 2;5(10):e0983. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000983. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Prone positioning may increase lung overdistension in COVID-19-induced ARDS.
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 3;12(1):16528. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20881-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical care ultrasound: development, evolution, current and evolving clinical concepts in critical care medicine.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 6;12:1622604. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1622604. eCollection 2025.
3
5
ESICM-ESPNIC international expert consensus on quantitative lung ultrasound in intensive care.
Intensive Care Med. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y.
6
How we use critical care ultrasound in the management of ventilatory settings in ARDS patients.
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Apr;51(4):769-772. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07851-y. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
8
A Comprehensive Review of Prone Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit: Challenges and Solutions.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 30;16(3):e57247. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57247. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Setting positive end-expiratory pressure: lung and diaphragm ultrasound.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024 Feb 1;30(1):53-60. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001119. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

2
Lung ultrasound monitoring: impact on economics and outcomes.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Apr 1;36(2):234-239. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001231. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Feasibility of a New Lung Ultrasound Protocol to Determine the Extent of Lung Injury in COVID-19 Pneumonia.
Chest. 2023 Jan;163(1):176-184. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
4
Lung response to prone positioning in mechanically-ventilated patients with COVID-19.
Crit Care. 2022 May 7;26(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03996-0.
7
Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia.
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;48(1):56-66. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06562-4. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
9
Role of total lung stress on the progression of early COVID-19 pneumonia.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;47(10):1130-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06519-7. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验