Improving the quality of Peer Review and accelerating the peer review process.
作者信息
Jawaid Shaukat Ali
出版信息
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jan-Feb;39(1):1-3. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.1.7236.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Improving the quality of Peer Review and accelerating the peer review process.提高同行评审质量并加快同行评审流程。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jan-Feb;39(1):1-3. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.1.7236.
2
Effects of Experimental Interventions to Improve the Biomedical Peer-Review Process: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.实验干预措施对改善生物医学同行评审过程的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e019903. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019903. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.从作者和审稿人的角度改进同行评审过程。
Br Dent J. 2016 Feb 26;220(4):167-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.131.
4
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals.生物医学期刊中最佳同行评审员与同行评审质量
Croat Med J. 2012 Aug;53(4):386-9. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386.
5
Evaluating, Improving, and Appreciating Peer Review at .评估、改进并重视同行评审于……（此处原英文内容不完整，缺少具体地点等信息）
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2021 Mar 1;14(1):1-3. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Advancing kinesiology through improved peer review.通过改进同行评审推动运动机能学发展。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014 Jun;85(2):127-35. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2014.898117.
7
Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing.同行评审与期刊影响因子：当代医学出版的两大支柱。
Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):5-12.
8
Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.科学出版物中的同行评审：益处、批判及生存指南。
EJIFCC. 2014 Oct 24;25(3):227-43. eCollection 2014 Oct.
9
Improving the Quality of Radiation Treatment for Patients in Ontario: Increasing Peer Review Activities on a Jurisdictional Level Using a Change Management Approach.提高安大略省患者的放射治疗质量：采用变革管理方法在辖区层面增加同行评审活动。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jan;12(1):81-2, e61-70. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006882.
10
Clinical peer review in the United States: history, legal development and subsequent abuse.美国的临床同行评审：历史、法律发展及后续滥用情况
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 7;20(21):6357-63. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6357.
引用本文的文献
1
Fishing reviewing: A threat to research integrity and credibility.钓鱼式评审：对研究诚信和可信度的一种威胁。
World J Methodol. 2025 Sep 20;15(3):98795. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i3.98795.
本文引用的文献
1
Peer Review: How much weightage should the editor give to reviewer's opinion?同行评审：编辑应给予审稿人意见多大的权重？
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Sep-Oct;34(5):1051-1053. doi: 10.12669/pjms.345.16322.
2
Authors- the most dangerous pressure group.作者——最危险的压力团体。
Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Nov-Dec;30(6):1177-9. doi: 10.12669/pjms.306.6465.
3
Are the Editors faced with e-problems performing their duties and responsibilities satisfactorily?编辑们在应对电子问题时，是否能满意地履行职责？
Pak J Med Sci. 2013 Sep;29(5):1087-92. doi: 10.12669/pjms.295.4179.
4
Problems faced by editors of peer reviewed medical journals.同行评审医学期刊编辑面临的问题。
Saudi Med J. 2004 Jan;25(1 Suppl):S21-5.
Zotero 插件