相似文献
1
Fishing reviewing: A threat to research integrity and credibility.
World J Methodol. 2025 Sep 20;15(3):98795. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i3.98795.
2
Ethical integrity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: challenges, pitfalls, and best practices in ophthalmology.
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 31;14(2):40-49. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1522. eCollection 2025 Summer.
3
Do peer reviewers comment on reporting items as instructed by the journal? A secondary analysis of two randomized trials.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May 8;183:111818. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111818.
4
Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice.
Microb Biotechnol. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70180. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70180.
5
Nursing Academic Reviewers' Perspectives on AI-Assisted Peer Review: Ethical Challenges and Acceptance.
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70100. doi: 10.1111/inr.70100.
6
Troubling Trends in Biomedical Research Publication: "Publish or Perish" Results in a Propensity for Ethical Violations.
Arthroscopy. 2025 Apr;41(4):859-862. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.12.017. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
7
Key Guidelines for Responding to Reviewers.
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 20;13:921. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.154614.1. eCollection 2024.
8
Navigating Neurotypical Norms in Academic Research: A Perspective from an Autistic Early Career Researcher.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):133-140. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0182. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Artificial intelligence as author: Can scientific reviewers recognize GPT-4o-generated manuscripts?
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 30;97:216-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.07.034.
本文引用的文献
1
Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading.
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec 4;38(47):e405. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e405.
2
Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Nov 9;13(11):2599-2614. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13110181.
3
The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT.
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):e19688. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Prejudice, Interests, Jealousy: Inappropriate Peer Reviewers May Be Exacerbating Inequality in Academic Publication in Health Research.
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Aug 21;38(33):e256. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e256.
5
The critical role of peer reviewers: Challenges and future steps.
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023 Feb;40(1):14-21. doi: 10.1177/14550725221092862. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
6
Improving the quality of Peer Review and accelerating the peer review process.
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jan-Feb;39(1):1-3. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.1.7236.
7
The art of peer review: Guidelines to become a credible and constructive peer reviewer.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;35(4):470-478. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
8
Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts.
Scientometrics. 2022;127(6):3413-3435. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04357-y. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
9
Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02821-6.
10
Peer reviews. A peer reviewer's view.
Postgrad Med J. 2020 Dec;96(1142):725-727. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138793. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Zotero 插件