Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Bioessays. 2019 Jul;41(7):e1900047. doi: 10.1002/bies.201900047.
Sympatric speciation illustrates how natural and sexual selection may create new species in isolation without geographic barriers. However, recent genomic reanalyses of classic examples of sympatric speciation reveal complex histories of secondary gene flow from outgroups into the radiation. In contrast, the rich theoretical literature on this process distinguishes among a diverse range of models based on simple genetic histories and different types of reproductive isolating barriers. Thus, there is a need to revisit how to connect theoretical models of sympatric speciation and their predictions to empirical case studies in the face of widespread gene flow. Here, theoretical differences among different types of sympatric speciation and speciation-with-gene-flow models are reviewed and summarized, and genomic analyses are proposed for distinguishing which models apply to case studies based on the timing and function of adaptive introgression. Investigating whether secondary gene flow contributed to reproductive isolation is necessary to test whether predictions of theory are ultimately borne out in nature.
同域物种形成说明了自然选择和性选择如何在没有地理屏障的情况下,在隔离状态下创造新物种。然而,最近对同域物种形成的经典案例进行的基因组重新分析显示,从外部群体到辐射内部存在复杂的二次基因流历史。相比之下,关于这一过程的丰富理论文献根据简单的遗传历史和不同类型的生殖隔离障碍,对各种模型进行了区分。因此,在面对广泛的基因流动时,有必要重新审视如何将同域物种形成的理论模型及其预测与实证案例研究联系起来。在这里,综述并总结了不同类型的同域物种形成和带有基因流动的物种形成模型之间的理论差异,并提出了基因组分析方法,以根据适应性基因渐渗的时间和功能来区分适用的模型。研究二次基因流是否有助于生殖隔离对于检验理论预测是否最终在自然界中得到验证是必要的。