Leipzig University, Germany.
BetterUp.
Cognition. 2023 May;234:105369. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105369. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
Humans frequently benefit others strategically to elicit future cooperation. While such forms of calculated reciprocity are powerful in eliciting cooperative behaviors even among self-interested agents, they depend on advanced cognitive and behavioral capacities such as prospection (representing and planning for future events) and extended delay of gratification. In fact, it has been proposed that these constraints help explain why calculated reciprocity exists in humans and is rare or even absent in other animals. The current study investigated the cognitive foundation of calculated reciprocity by examining its ontogenetic emergence in relation to key aspects of children's cognitive development. Three-to-five-year-old children from the US (N = 72, mostly White, from mixed socioeconomic backgrounds) first completed a cognitive test battery assessing the cognitive capacities hypothesized to be foundational for calculated reciprocity. In a second session, children participated in a calculated reciprocity task in which they could decide how many resources to share with a partner who later had the opportunity to reciprocate (reciprocity condition) and with a partner who could not reciprocate (control condition). Results indicated a steep developmental emergence of calculated reciprocity between 3 and 5 years of age. Further analyses showed that measures of delay of gratification and prospection were important predictors of children's rate of calculated reciprocity, even when controlling for age and after including a measure of verbal ability. By contrast, theory of mind abilities were unrelated to children's reciprocal behavior. This is the first systematic investigation of essential cognitive capacities for calculated reciprocity. We discuss prospection and delay of gratification as two domain-general capacities that are utilized for calculated reciprocity and which could explain developmental as well as species-differences in cooperation.
人类经常会出于策略考虑而帮助他人,以换取未来的合作。虽然这种形式的算计互惠在引发合作行为方面非常有效,即使在自私自利的代理人中也是如此,但它依赖于高级认知和行为能力,如前瞻性(代表和规划未来事件)和延迟满足。事实上,有人提出,这些限制有助于解释为什么算计互惠存在于人类中,而在其他动物中却很少甚至不存在。本研究通过考察其与儿童认知发展关键方面的关系,探讨了算计互惠的认知基础。来自美国的 3 至 5 岁儿童(N=72,主要是白人,来自混合社会经济背景)首先完成了一个认知测试组,评估了被认为是算计互惠基础的认知能力。在第二阶段,孩子们参与了一个算计互惠任务,他们可以决定与一个有机会回报的伙伴(互惠条件)和一个不能回报的伙伴(控制条件)分享多少资源。结果表明,3 至 5 岁之间算计互惠的发展急剧出现。进一步的分析表明,延迟满足和前瞻性的衡量标准是儿童算计互惠率的重要预测指标,即使在控制年龄并包括言语能力衡量标准之后也是如此。相比之下,心理理论能力与儿童的互惠行为无关。这是对算计互惠的基本认知能力的首次系统调查。我们讨论了前瞻性和延迟满足作为用于算计互惠的两个一般领域的能力,这可以解释合作方面的发展和物种差异。