• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期≤2cm 宫颈癌(LESSER)简单型与 B2 型子宫切除术的概念验证随机Ⅱ期非劣效性试验。

Proof-of-concept randomized phase II non-inferiority trial of simple versus type B2 hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer ≤2 cm (LESSER).

机构信息

Surgery/Oncology, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil.

Gynecology, Hospital de Cancer de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Apr 3;33(4):498-503. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004092.

DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2022-004092
PMID:36696980
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the non-inferiority and safety of simple hysterectomy in early stage (<2 cm) cervical cancer.

METHODS

This proof-of-concept randomized phase II non-inferiority trial was performed between May 2015 and April 2018 in three oncological centers in Northeast Brazil. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stages IA2-IB1 cervical cancer and tumors ≤2 cm were treated with either simple or modified radical hysterectomy (Querleu-Morrow type B2). Intention-to-treat analysis was carried out. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival and secondary endpoints were overall survival, operative outcomes, adjuvant therapy, and patient's health-related quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients underwent either simple hysterectomy (n=20) or modified radical hysterectomy (n=20). All patients except three underwent open procedures (n=37/40, 92.5%). At a median follow-up of 52.1 months (IQR 43.9-60.1), 3-year disease-free survival was 95% (95% CI 68% to 99%) after simple hysterectomy and 100% (95% CI 100% to 100%) after modified radical hysterectomy (log-rank p=0.30). The corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 90% (95% CI 64% to 97%) and 91% (95% CI 50% to 98%), respectively (log-rank p=0.46). The operative time was shorter after simple hysterectomy than after modified radical hysterectomy (150 min (IQR 137.5-180) vs 199.5 min (IQR 140-230); p=0.003), with a trend towards a longer time for vesical catheterization removal (1 day (IQR 1-1) vs 1 day (IQR 1-2); p=0.043). There was no post-operative mortality and the rates of post-operative complications were not statistically different between arms (15% and 25%; p=0.69). QoL questionnaires were received from only 17 patients (42.5%), with no major differences observed over time between the surgical arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple hysterectomy is safe and potentially non-inferior to the radical surgery in patients with early-stage cervical cancer ≤2 cm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02613286.

摘要

目的

评估早期(<2cm)宫颈癌单纯子宫切除术的非劣效性和安全性。

方法

这是一项概念验证性、随机、二期非劣效性临床试验,于 2015 年 5 月至 2018 年 4 月在巴西东北部的三个肿瘤中心进行。纳入国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)2009 分期的 IA2-IB1 期宫颈癌和肿瘤直径≤2cm 的患者,分别行单纯性或改良根治性子宫切除术(Querleu-Morrow 型 B2)。采用意向治疗分析。主要终点为 3 年无病生存率,次要终点为总生存率、手术结局、辅助治疗和患者健康相关生活质量(QoL)。

结果

共 40 例患者接受了单纯性子宫切除术(n=20)或改良根治性子宫切除术(n=20)。除 3 例患者外,所有患者均接受了开放性手术(n=37/40,92.5%)。中位随访 52.1 个月(IQR 43.9-60.1)时,单纯性子宫切除术 3 年无病生存率为 95%(95%CI 68%-99%),改良根治性子宫切除术为 100%(95%CI 100%-100%)(对数秩检验,p=0.30)。相应的 5 年总生存率分别为 90%(95%CI 64%-97%)和 91%(95%CI 50%-98%)(对数秩检验,p=0.46)。单纯性子宫切除术的手术时间短于改良根治性子宫切除术(150min(IQR 137.5-180)vs 199.5min(IQR 140-230);p=0.003),且膀胱导管拔出时间有延长趋势(1d(IQR 1-1)vs 1d(IQR 1-2);p=0.043)。无术后死亡,手术组术后并发症发生率无统计学差异(15%和 25%;p=0.69)。仅收到 17 名患者(42.5%)的 QoL 问卷,在手术臂之间未观察到随时间的显著差异。

结论

对于肿瘤直径≤2cm 的早期宫颈癌患者,单纯性子宫切除术安全且可能不劣于根治性手术。

试验注册号

NCT02613286。

相似文献

1
Proof-of-concept randomized phase II non-inferiority trial of simple versus type B2 hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer ≤2 cm (LESSER).早期≤2cm 宫颈癌(LESSER)简单型与 B2 型子宫切除术的概念验证随机Ⅱ期非劣效性试验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Apr 3;33(4):498-503. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004092.
2
Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.接受开腹与微创根治性子宫切除术(LACC)的宫颈癌患者的生活质量:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、3 期、非劣效性试验的次要结局。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):851-860. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30081-4.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.比较肿瘤大小≤2cm 的宫颈癌患者行腹腔镜与开腹广泛子宫切除术的疗效。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 May;30(5):564-571. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000994. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
Survival associated with extent of radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a subanalysis of the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative study.根治性子宫切除术范围与早期宫颈癌生存相关:监测宫颈癌(SCCAN)合作研究的亚分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):428.e1-428.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.030. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
5
Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.改良根治性腹腔镜子宫切除术与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌近期临床疗效的单中心前瞻性随机对照研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun 3;21(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03044-3.
6
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术联合经阴道阴道残端关闭术——一项多中心分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):845-850. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388.
7
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.2018 年 FIGO 分期中微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的结局比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
8
A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.一项比较腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IB1、IB2 和 IIA1 期)疗效的多中心非劣效性随机对照研究:LAUNCH 2 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 8;23(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06245-5.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.比较肿瘤直径 3cm 或更大的 FIGO 分期 IB 和 IIA 期宫颈癌行腹腔镜与开腹广泛子宫切除术的疗效。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Feb;24(2):280-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000052.
10
The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IB2期宫颈癌患者行根治性子宫切除术后的最佳肿瘤大小上限。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jul;30(7):975-980. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001271. Epub 2020 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Updates on Surgical Management of Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌患者手术治疗的最新进展
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;17(13):2259. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132259.
2
Simple Hysterectomy as a Viable Alternative to Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.单纯子宫切除术作为早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的可行替代方案:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 24. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17520-5.
3
Long-Term Survival in Patients With Low-Risk Cervical Cancer After Simple, Modified, or Radical Hysterectomy.
低风险宫颈癌患者行单纯、改良或根治性子宫切除术后的长期生存情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510717. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10717.
4
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Women with Low-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Narrative Review.磁共振成像在低风险早期宫颈癌女性管理中的应用:一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 12;15(8):985. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15080985.
5
The potential for de-escalation radical surgery in women with stage IB2 cervical cancer (FIGO 2018): a multi-institutional experience of 63,926 cases over a 14-year period in China.IB2期宫颈癌(国际妇产科联盟2018年分期)患者行降阶梯根治性手术的可能性:中国14年间63926例多机构经验。
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02917-6.
6
Advances in cervical cancer: current insights and future directions.宫颈癌的进展:当前见解与未来方向
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2025 Feb;45(2):77-109. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12629. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of simple hysterectomy compared to radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: analysis from the GCIG/CCTG CX.5/SHAPE trial.早期宫颈癌单纯子宫切除术与根治性子宫切除术的成本效果分析:GCIG/CCTG CX.5/SHAPE 试验分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Nov;35(6):e117. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e117. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
8
Survival After Simple Compared With Radical Hysterectomy for Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌患者单纯子宫切除术与根治性子宫切除术后的生存率比较
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan 1;145(1):99-107. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005743. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
9
Assessing minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low risk cervical cancer: set up for the LASH trial.评估低危宫颈癌的微创单纯子宫切除术:LASH 试验的设定。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Nov 4;34(11):1805-1808. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005941.
10
Controversies and Advances in the Personalized Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer.宫颈癌个体化手术治疗的争议与进展
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 6;14(6):606. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060606.