Energy and Power Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Aceleron Limited, Bromsgrove, UK.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 25;13(1):1374. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28377-7.
As the world transitions to net zero, energy storage is becoming increasingly important for applications such as electric vehicles, mini-grids, and utility-scale grid stability. The growing demand for storage will constrain raw battery materials, reduce the availability of new batteries, and increase the rate of battery retirement. As retired batteries are difficult to recycle into components, to avoid huge amounts of battery waste, reuse and repurposing options are needed. In this research, we explore the feasibility of using second-life batteries (which have been retired from their first intended life) and solar photovoltaics to provide affordable energy access to primary schools in Kenya. Based on interviews with 12 East African schools, realistic system sizes were determined with varying solar photovoltaic sizes (5-10 kW in 2.5 kW increments) and lithium-ion battery capacities (5-20 kWh in 5 kWh increments). Each combination was simulated under four scenarios as a sensitivity analysis of battery transportation costs (i.e., whether they are sourced locally or imported). A techno-economic analysis is undertaken to compare new and second-life batteries in the resulting 48 system scenarios in terms of cost and performance. We find that second-life batteries decrease the levelized cost of electricity by 5.6-35.3% in 97.2% of scenarios compared to similar systems with new batteries, and by 41.9-64.5% compared to the cost of the same energy service provided by the utility grid. The systems with the smallest levelized cost of electricity (i.e., 0.11 USD/kWh) use either 7.5 kW or 10 kW of solar with 20 kWh of storage. Across all cases, the payback period is decreased by 8.2-42.9% using second-life batteries compared to new batteries; the system with the smallest payback period (i.e., 2.9 years) uses 5 kW solar and 5 kWh storage. These results show second-life batteries to be viable and cost-competitive compared to new batteries for school electrification in Kenya, providing the same benefits while reducing waste.
随着世界向净零排放过渡,能源存储对于电动汽车、微电网和电网稳定性等应用变得越来越重要。对存储的需求不断增长将限制原始电池材料的供应,减少新电池的可用性,并增加电池退役的速度。由于退役电池难以回收成组件,为了避免大量电池浪费,需要考虑再利用和重新利用的选择。在这项研究中,我们探讨了使用二次电池(已从其最初预期的使用寿命中退役)和太阳能光伏为肯尼亚的小学提供负担得起的能源的可行性。通过对 12 所东非学校的访谈,根据不同的太阳能光伏大小(5-10kW,每次增加 2.5kW)和锂离子电池容量(5-20kWh,每次增加 5kWh)确定了实际的系统规模。每种组合在四种情景下进行了模拟,作为电池运输成本的敏感性分析(即,它们是在当地采购还是进口)。进行了技术经济分析,以比较新电池和二次电池在 48 个系统情景中的成本和性能。我们发现,与使用新电池的类似系统相比,二次电池在 97.2%的情况下将平准化电力成本降低了 5.6-35.3%,与公用事业电网提供相同能源服务的成本相比降低了 41.9-64.5%。平准化电力成本最低的系统(即 0.11 美元/千瓦时)使用 7.5kW 或 10kW 的太阳能和 20kWh 的存储。在所有情况下,与使用新电池相比,使用二次电池将使投资回收期缩短 8.2-42.9%;投资回收期最短的系统(即 2.9 年)使用 5kW 太阳能和 5kWh 存储。这些结果表明,与新电池相比,二次电池对于肯尼亚的学校电气化是可行且具有成本竞争力的,在提供相同效益的同时减少了浪费。