Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Research & Innovation Center, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan 48121, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 2;54(11):6878-6887. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05883. Epub 2020 May 11.
Energy storage can reduce peak power consumption from the electricity grid and therefore the cost for fast-charging electric vehicles (EVs). It can also enable EV charging in areas where grid limitations would otherwise preclude it. To address both the need for a fast-charging infrastructure as well as management of end-of-life EV batteries, second-life battery (SLB)-based energy storage is proposed for EV fast-charging systems. The electricity grid-based fast-charging configuration was compared to lithium-ion SLB-based configurations in terms of economic cost and life cycle environmental impact in five U.S. cities. Compared to using new batteries, SLB reduced the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) by 12-41% and the global warming potential (GWP) by 7-77%. Photovoltaics along with SLB reduced the use of grid electricity and provided higher GWP and cumulative energy demand (CED) reduction compared to only using SLB. The LCOE of the SLB-based configurations was sensitive to SLB cost, lifetime, efficiency, and discount rate, whereas the GWP and CED were affected by SLB lifetime, efficiency, and the required enclosure materials. Solar insolation and electricity pricing structures were key in determining the configuration, which was economically and environmentally suitable for a location.
储能可以减少电网的峰值电力消耗,从而降低快速充电电动汽车(EV)的成本。它还可以使电网受限的地区能够进行电动汽车充电。为了解决快速充电基础设施的需求以及管理电动汽车电池的使用寿命问题,提出了基于二次电池(SLB)的储能用于电动汽车快速充电系统。在五个美国城市中,基于电网的快速充电配置与锂离子 SLB 配置在经济成本和生命周期环境影响方面进行了比较。与使用新电池相比,SLB 将平准化电力成本(LCOE)降低了 12-41%,全球变暖潜势(GWP)降低了 7-77%。与仅使用 SLB 相比,光伏与 SLB 结合使用可以减少对电网电力的使用,并提供更高的 GWP 和累计能源需求(CED)降低。SLB 配置的 LCOE 对 SLB 成本、寿命、效率和折扣率敏感,而 GWP 和 CED 则受 SLB 寿命、效率和所需外壳材料的影响。太阳能辐照度和电价结构是确定配置的关键因素,该配置在经济和环境方面适合特定地点。