• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过重构夜间临床工作流程来减少住院患者夜间的中断并改善其睡眠。

Reducing Nighttime Interruptions and Improving Sleep for Hospitalized Patients by Restructuring Nighttime Clinical Workflow.

机构信息

Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(9):2091-2097. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-08005-2. Epub 2023 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-022-08005-2
PMID:36697927
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10361944/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nighttime sleep disruptions negatively impact the experience of hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of adopting a sleep-promoting nighttime clinical workflow for hospitalized patients on nocturnal disruptions and sleep.

DESIGN

Survey-based pre- and post-intervention cross-sectional study using convenience samples.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalized veterans on a 23-bed general medical ward at a tertiary Veterans Administration Hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

Baseline sleep surveys (N=149) identified two major sources of interruptions: blood pressure checks at 4 am for telemetry patients and subcutaneous (SQ) heparin injections between 4:30 and 6 am for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Clinical workflow was restructured to eliminate these disruptions: moving 4 am blood pressure checks to 6 am and providing daily SQ enoxaparin at 9 am as an alternative to Q 8-h SQ heparin, which had prompted an injection between 4:30 and 6 am. The impact of these changes was assessed in a second round of surveys (N=99).

MAIN MEASURES

Frequency and sources for nighttime sleep disruptions; percentage of patients reporting longer time to fall asleep, more interruptions, and worse sleep quality (vs. home) before and after restructuring nighttime clinical workflow.

KEY RESULTS

After restructuring nighttime clinical workflow, medication administration as a source of nighttime disruption decreased from 40% (59/149) to 4% (4/99) (p<0.001). Blood pressure checks as a source of disruption decreased from 56% (84/149) to 42% (42/99) (p=0.033). Fewer patients reported taking longer to fall asleep in the hospital vs. home (39% pre-intervention vs. 25% post-intervention, p=0.021). Similarly, fewer patients experienced waking up more frequently in the hospital vs. home (46% pre-intervention vs. 32% post-intervention, p=0.036). Fewer patients reported sleeping worse in the hospital (44% pre-intervention vs. 39% post-intervention), though this trend was not statistically significant (p=0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Nighttime disruptions in hospitalized patients frequently interfere with sleep. Restructuring of the clinical workflow significantly reduced disruptions and improved sleep.

摘要

背景

夜间睡眠中断会对住院患者的体验产生负面影响。

目的

确定为住院患者采用促进睡眠的夜间临床工作流程对夜间中断和睡眠的影响。

设计

使用便利样本进行基于调查的干预前后横断面研究。

参与者

退伍军人事务部退伍军人事务部的一家三级退伍军人事务医院的 23 张普通医疗病房住院患者。

干预措施

基线睡眠调查(N=149)确定了两个主要的中断源:遥测患者的凌晨 4 点血压检查和静脉血栓栓塞预防的凌晨 4:30 至 6 点之间的皮下(SQ)肝素注射。临床工作流程进行了重组,以消除这些干扰:将凌晨 4 点的血压检查推迟到早上 6 点,并提供每天早上 9 点的 SQ 依诺肝素,作为 Q 8-h SQ 肝素的替代方案,后者在凌晨 4:30 至 6 点之间引发了注射。第二轮调查(N=99)评估了这些变化的影响。

主要措施

夜间睡眠中断的频率和来源;报告入睡时间更长、中断更多和睡眠质量更差(与在家相比)的患者百分比,在重组夜间临床工作流程前后。

主要结果

重组夜间临床工作流程后,作为夜间中断源的药物管理从 40%(59/149)降至 4%(4/99)(p<0.001)。作为中断源的血压检查从 56%(84/149)降至 42%(42/99)(p=0.033)。与在家相比,报告在医院入睡时间更长的患者人数减少(39% 干预前 vs. 25% 干预后,p=0.021)。同样,与在家相比,在医院更频繁醒来的患者人数减少(46% 干预前 vs. 32% 干预后,p=0.036)。与在家相比,更多的患者报告在医院睡眠质量更差(44% 干预前 vs. 39% 干预后),但这一趋势没有统计学意义(p=0.54)。

结论

住院患者夜间的中断经常干扰睡眠。临床工作流程的重组显著减少了中断并改善了睡眠。

相似文献

1
Reducing Nighttime Interruptions and Improving Sleep for Hospitalized Patients by Restructuring Nighttime Clinical Workflow.通过重构夜间临床工作流程来减少住院患者夜间的中断并改善其睡眠。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(9):2091-2097. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-08005-2. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
2
Objective Sleep Characteristics and Factors Associated With Sleep Duration and Waking During Pediatric Hospitalization.目的 儿科住院患者的睡眠特征及与睡眠时间和清醒相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e213924. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3924.
3
Piloting I-SLEEP: a patient-centered education and empowerment intervention to improve patients' in-hospital sleep.试行I-SLEEP:一项以患者为中心的教育与赋权干预措施,旨在改善患者的住院睡眠。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Aug 19;7(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00895-z.
4
Effectiveness of an Analytics-Based Intervention for Reducing Sleep Interruption in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于分析的干预措施对减少住院患者睡眠中断的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):172-177. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7387.
5
Randomized, controlled trial of a nonpharmacological intervention to improve abnormal sleep/wake patterns in nursing home residents.一项非药物干预改善养老院居民异常睡眠/觉醒模式的随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 May;53(5):803-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53251.x.
6
Improving Hospitalized Children's Sleep by Reducing Excessive Overnight Blood Pressure Monitoring.通过减少夜间过度血压监测来改善住院儿童的睡眠。
Pediatrics. 2020 Sep;146(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2217.
7
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nighttime room entries and sleep disruptions for pediatric patients.COVID-19 大流行对儿科患者夜间入房和睡眠中断的影响。
Sleep Med. 2021 Aug;84:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.05.020. Epub 2021 May 28.
8
Characterizing pediatric inpatient sleep duration and disruptions.描述儿科住院患者的睡眠时长和睡眠中断情况。
Sleep Med. 2019 May;57:87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.01.030. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
9
Effectiveness of SIESTA on Objective and Subjective Metrics of Nighttime Hospital Sleep Disruptors.SIESTA 对夜间医院睡眠干扰的客观和主观指标的有效性。
J Hosp Med. 2019 Jan;14(1):38-41. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3091.
10
Optimizing Oral Medication Schedules for Inpatient Sleep: A Quality Improvement Intervention.优化住院患者睡眠的口服用药时间安排:一项质量改进干预措施。
Hosp Pediatr. 2021 Apr;11(4):327-333. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-002261. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Nudging towards Sleep-Friendly Health Care: A Multifaceted Approach on Reducing Unnecessary Overnight Interventions.推动睡眠友好型医疗保健:减少不必要夜间干预的多方面方法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):1025-1039. doi: 10.1055/a-2404-2344. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Things We Do For No Reason™: Routine Overnight Vital Sign Checks.我们无缘无故做的事™:常规夜间生命体征检查。
J Hosp Med. 2020 May;15(5):272-274. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3442. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Effectiveness of SIESTA on Objective and Subjective Metrics of Nighttime Hospital Sleep Disruptors.SIESTA 对夜间医院睡眠干扰的客观和主观指标的有效性。
J Hosp Med. 2019 Jan;14(1):38-41. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3091.
3
Sleep in Hospitalized Older Adults.住院老年人的睡眠
Sleep Med Clin. 2018 Mar;13(1):127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
4
Insomnia in United States military veterans: An integrated theoretical model.美国退伍军人的失眠症:一个综合理论模型。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
5
Awakenings? Patient and Hospital Staff Perceptions of Nighttime Disruptions and Their Effect on Patient Sleep.《觉醒?患者与医院工作人员对夜间干扰及其对患者睡眠影响的看法》
J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 Feb 15;13(2):301-306. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6468.
6
Improving inpatient environments to support patient sleep.改善住院环境以促进患者睡眠。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Oct;28(5):540-553. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw079. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
7
Pilot study aiming to support sleep quality and duration during hospitalizations.旨在改善住院期间睡眠质量和时长的试点研究。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Jul;11(7):467-72. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2578. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房促进睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 6;2015(10):CD008808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008808.pub2.
9
A prospective study of nighttime vital sign monitoring frequency and risk of clinical deterioration.一项关于夜间生命体征监测频率与临床病情恶化风险的前瞻性研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Sep 9;173(16):1554-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7791.
10
Objective sleep duration and quality in hospitalized older adults: associations with blood pressure and mood.住院老年人的客观睡眠时间和质量:与血压及情绪的关联
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2185-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03644.x.