Suppr超能文献

根据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2017-140)对转基因玉米MON 87419进行食品和饲料用途评估。

Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87419 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2017-140).

作者信息

Mullins Ewen, Bresson Jean-Louis, Dalmay Tamas, Dewhurst Ian Crawford, Epstein Michelle M, Firbank Leslie George, Guerche Philippe, Hejatko Jan, Moreno Francisco Javier, Naegeli Hanspeter, Nogué Fabien, Rostoks Nils, Serrano Jose Juan Sánchez, Savoini Giovanni, Veromann Eve, Veronesi Fabio, Ardizzone Michele, De Sanctis Giacomo, Federici Silvia, Fernandez Dumont Antonio, Gennaro Andrea, Gómez Ruiz José Ángel, Goumperis Tilemachos, Lanzoni Anna, Lenzi Paolo, Lewandowska Aleksandra, Camargo Ana Martin, Neri Franco Maria, Papadopoulou Nikoletta, Paraskevopoulos Konstantinos, Raffaello Tommaso

出版信息

EFSA J. 2023 Jan 20;21(1):e07730. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7730. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Genetically modified maize MON 87419 was developed to confer tolerance to dicamba- and glufosinate-based herbicides. These properties were achieved by introducing the and expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize MON 87419 and its conventional counterpart needed further assessment, except for the levels of arginine and protein in grains which did not raise safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the dicamba mono-oxygenase (DMO) and phosphinothricin -acetyltransferase (PAT) proteins as expressed in maize MON 87419. The GMO Panel finds no evidence that the genetic modification impacts the overall safety of maize MON 87419. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize MON 87419 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize MON 87419 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and non-GM maize varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize MON 87419 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize MON 87419. The GMO Panel concludes that maize MON 87419 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

摘要

转基因玉米MON 87419旨在获得对麦草畏和草铵膦类除草剂的耐受性。通过导入[具体基因]和[具体基因]表达盒实现了这些特性。分子特征数据和生物信息学分析未发现需要进行食品/饲料安全性评估的问题。除了籽粒中精氨酸和蛋白质水平未引发安全性和营养问题外,在玉米MON 87419与其常规对照品种之间测试的农艺/表型及成分特征的所有已识别差异均无需进一步评估。转基因生物小组未发现与玉米MON 87419中表达的麦草畏单加氧酶(DMO)和草丁膦乙酰转移酶(PAT)蛋白的毒性和致敏性相关的安全问题。转基因生物小组没有发现证据表明基因改造会影响玉米MON 87419的整体安全性。在本申请范围内,食用来自玉米MON 87419的食品和饲料对人类和动物不构成营养问题。转基因生物小组得出结论,玉米MON 87419与常规对照品种以及所测试的非转基因玉米品种一样安全,无需对食品/饲料进行上市后监测。如果有活力的玉米MON 87419籽粒意外释放到环境中,这不会引发环境安全问题。上市后环境监测计划和报告间隔符合玉米MON 87419的预期用途。转基因生物小组得出结论,就对人类和动物健康以及环境的潜在影响而言,玉米MON 87419与其常规对照品种以及所测试的非转基因玉米品种一样安全。

相似文献

8
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 94804 (application GMFF-2022-10651).
EFSA J. 2024 Apr 26;22(4):e8714. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8714. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 95275 (application GMFF-2022-5890).
EFSA J. 2024 Aug 1;22(8):e8886. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8886. eCollection 2024 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 (application GMFF-2023-14732).
EFSA J. 2025 May 12;23(5):e9381. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9381. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Risk assessment of homologous variants of biotech trait proteins using a bridging approach.
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):336-351. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2420412. Epub 2024 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

3
Abundance and Stability as Common Properties of Allergens.
Front Allergy. 2021 Oct 28;2:769728. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2021.769728. eCollection 2021.
4
Update of environmental risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations of EFSA (2016) on EU teosinte.
EFSA J. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):e07228. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7228. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Statement on protein digestibility tests in allergenicity and protein safety assessment of genetically modified plants.
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 12;19(1):e06350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6350. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Adaptive introgression from maize has facilitated the establishment of teosinte as a noxious weed in Europe.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25618-25627. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006633117. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Are Physicochemical Properties Shaping the Allergenic Potency of Plant Allergens?
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 Feb;62(1):37-63. doi: 10.1007/s12016-020-08810-9.
10
Guidance on allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants.
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 22;15(6):e04862. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4862. eCollection 2017 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验