Mullins Ewen, Bresson Jean-Louis, Dalmay Tamas, Dewhurst Ian Crawford, Epstein Michelle M, Firbank Leslie George, Guerche Philippe, Hejatko Jan, Moreno Francisco Javier, Naegeli Hanspeter, Nogue Fabien, Rostoks Nils, Sánchez Serrano Jose Juan, Savoini Giovanni, Veromann Eve, Veronesi Fabio, Ardizzone Michele, Camargo Ana M, De Sanctis Giacomo, Federici Silvia, Fernandez Dumont Antonio, Gennaro Andrea, Gomez Ruiz Jose Angel, Goumperis Tilemachos, Kagkli Dafni Maria, Lenzi Paolo, Lewandowska Aleksandra, Neri Franco Maria, Papadopoulou Nikoletta, Raffaello Tommaso
EFSA J. 2024 Jan 17;22(1):e8490. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8490. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Genetically modified maize DP915635 was developed to confer tolerance to glufosinate herbicide and resistance to corn rootworm pests. These properties were achieved by introducing the and expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DP915635 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment, except for the levels of crude protein in forage, which does not raise nutritional and safety concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the IPD079Ea, PAT and PMI proteins expressed in maize DP915635. The GMO Panel finds no evidence that the genetic modification impacts the overall safety of maize DP915635. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DP915635 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP915635 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and non-GM maize varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize DP915635 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP915635. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP915635 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
转基因玉米DP915635经培育后具有草铵膦除草剂耐受性和抗玉米根虫害虫的特性。这些特性是通过导入[具体表达盒名称缺失]表达盒实现的。分子特征数据和生物信息学分析未发现需要进行食品/饲料安全性评估的问题。除了饲草中粗蛋白水平外,在玉米DP915635与其传统对照品种之间测试的农艺/表型和成分特征的所有已识别差异均无需进一步评估,而粗蛋白水平也未引发营养和安全方面的担忧。转基因生物小组未发现与玉米DP915635中表达的IPD079Ea、PAT和PMI蛋白的毒性和致敏性有关的安全问题。转基因生物小组没有发现证据表明基因改造会影响玉米DP915635的整体安全性。在此申请的背景下,食用来自玉米DP915635的食品和饲料对人和动物不构成营养方面的担忧。转基因生物小组得出结论,玉米DP915635与传统对照品种以及测试的非转基因玉米品种一样安全,无需对食品/饲料进行上市后监测。如果有活力的玉米DP915635籽粒意外释放到环境中,这不会引发环境安全问题。上市后环境监测计划和报告间隔符合玉米DP915635的预期用途。转基因生物小组得出结论,就对人类和动物健康以及环境的潜在影响而言,玉米DP915635与其传统对照品种以及测试的非转基因玉米品种一样安全。