Edward Jean, Bowling William, Chitwood Holly, Vanderpool Robin
Assistant Professor, College of Nursing; Nurse Scientist, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2022 May;13(5):156-164.
Cancer care delivery approaches to address financial toxicity among cancer patients are not well-established, especially in rural communities.
To identify healthcare staff perspectives of financial toxicity experienced by cancer patients and to examine staff- and systems-level cancer care delivery approaches for addressing financial toxicity, with a focus on rural cancer survivors in Kentucky.
We conducted key informant interviews using a semistructured interview guide with cancer center staff who provided financial navigation and/or assistance to oncology patients and their caregivers at 15 cancer centers in Kentucky.
Findings from this study revealed several key factors related to the availability and accessibility of cancer care delivery approaches at patient, staff, and system levels for reducing financial toxicity and improving access to care for rural and urban cancer survivors. Participants perceived high financial toxicity among cancer patients, especially in rural regions, related to the high cost of cancer care, as well the patients' limited ability to engage in cost-of-care conversations, low cost-related health literacy, and challenges in navigating cancer care. The availability of trained financial navigators/counselors dedicated solely to assisting the cancer patient population was limited, as was the use of standardized and proactive screening methods for financial toxicity. While in-house and external financial assistance programs were frequently tapped into, there were limitations in the navigators' ability to provide cost estimates based on insurance coverage and in assisting patients with applying for health insurance. Gaps in cancer care delivery approaches to reduce financial toxicity of patients included enhanced transportation options, additional financial navigation staff, early assessment of patient financial barriers and concerns, increased cost transparency, and enhanced cost-of-care conversations between patients and clinicians.
Establishing sustainable oncology-designated financial navigation roles is imperative to expanding patient support and improving health and financial outcomes of cancer patients. Future research is needed to gather evidence that informs programs targeted at mitigating financial toxicity of cancer patients in rural communities.
应对癌症患者经济毒性的癌症护理提供方法尚未完全确立,尤其是在农村社区。
确定医护人员对癌症患者所经历经济毒性的看法,并研究在工作人员和系统层面应对经济毒性的癌症护理提供方法,重点关注肯塔基州的农村癌症幸存者。
我们使用半结构化访谈指南对肯塔基州15家癌症中心的癌症中心工作人员进行了关键信息人访谈,这些工作人员为肿瘤患者及其护理人员提供财务指导和/或援助。
本研究的结果揭示了在患者、工作人员和系统层面,与癌症护理提供方法的可用性和可及性相关的几个关键因素,这些因素有助于降低经济毒性,并改善农村和城市癌症幸存者获得护理的机会。参与者认为癌症患者,尤其是农村地区的患者,经济毒性很高,这与癌症护理的高成本、患者参与护理费用讨论的能力有限、与成本相关的健康素养较低以及在癌症护理导航方面面临的挑战有关。专门致力于协助癌症患者群体的训练有素的财务导航员/顾问的可用性有限,用于经济毒性的标准化和主动筛查方法的使用也有限。虽然经常利用内部和外部财务援助计划,但导航员根据保险范围提供成本估算以及协助患者申请医疗保险的能力存在局限性。减少患者经济毒性的癌症护理提供方法方面的差距包括增加交通选择、增加财务导航工作人员、对患者财务障碍和担忧进行早期评估、提高成本透明度以及加强患者与临床医生之间关于护理费用的讨论。
建立可持续的肿瘤学指定财务导航角色对于扩大患者支持以及改善癌症患者的健康和财务结果至关重要。未来需要开展研究以收集证据,为旨在减轻农村社区癌症患者经济毒性的项目提供参考。