Benedetti Daniel J, Hammack-Aviran Catherine M, Diehl Carolyn, Beskow Laura M
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jan 9;10:1049661. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1049661. eCollection 2022.
To describe United States (US) pediatric oncologists' experiences with treatment refusal or abandonment, exploring types and frequency of decision-making conflicts, and their impact.
We conducted exploratory qualitative interviews of pediatric oncologists ( = 30) with experience caring for a pediatric patient who refused or abandoned curative treatment. Interviewees were recruited using convenience and nominated expert sampling, soliciting experiences from diverse geographic locations and institution sizes across the US. We analyzed transcripts using applied thematic analysis to identify and refine meaningful domains.
Many oncologists reported multiple experiences with refusal and abandonment. Most anticipated case frequency would increase due to misinformation, particularly on the internet. Interviewees described cases of treatment refusal and abandonment, but also a wider variety of cases than previously described in existing publications, including cases involving: non-adherence; negotiations for different treatments; negotiations for complementary and alternative medicine; delayed treatment initiation; and refusal of a component of recommended therapy. Cases often involved multiple stages or types of conflicts. Recurring patient/family behaviors emerged: clear opposition to treatment from the outset; hesitancy about treatment despite initiating therapy; and psychosocial circumstances becoming an obstacle to treatment completion. Oncologists revealed substantial professional and personal repercussions of these cases.
Oncologist interviews highlight a broad range of conflicts, yielding a taxonomy of treatment refusal, non-adherence and abandonment (TRNA) that accounts for the heterogeneity of situations described. Cases' complexity and interrelatedness points to a functional model of TRNA that includes families' behaviors. This preliminary taxonomy and model warrant further research and examination to refine the model and generate strategies to prevent and mitigate TRNA.
描述美国儿科肿瘤学家在面对治疗拒绝或放弃方面的经历,探讨决策冲突的类型和频率及其影响。
我们对30名有照顾拒绝或放弃根治性治疗的儿科患者经验的儿科肿瘤学家进行了探索性定性访谈。通过便利抽样和提名专家抽样的方式招募受访者,收集美国各地不同地理位置和机构规模的经验。我们使用应用主题分析法分析访谈记录,以识别和完善有意义的领域。
许多肿瘤学家报告了多次面对拒绝和放弃的经历。大多数人预计由于错误信息,尤其是互联网上的错误信息,此类病例的频率将会增加。受访者描述了治疗拒绝和放弃的案例,但也包括比现有出版物中先前描述的更多样化的案例,包括涉及以下方面的案例:不依从;关于不同治疗方法的协商;关于补充和替代医学的协商;延迟开始治疗;以及拒绝推荐治疗的某个组成部分。案例通常涉及多个阶段或类型的冲突。反复出现的患者/家庭行为包括:从一开始就明确反对治疗;尽管开始了治疗但仍对治疗犹豫不决;以及社会心理状况成为完成治疗的障碍。肿瘤学家揭示了这些案例对专业和个人产生的重大影响。
肿瘤学家访谈突出了广泛的冲突,产生了一种治疗拒绝、不依从和放弃(TRNA)的分类法,该分类法解释了所描述情况的异质性。案例的复杂性和相互关联性指向了一个包括家庭行为在内的TRNA功能模型。这种初步的分类法和模型值得进一步研究和审视,以完善该模型并制定预防和减轻TRNA的策略。