Singh Ranju, Kumar Jyotika, Jain Aruna, Puri Manju
Anaesthesiology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, IND.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Dec 23;14(12):e32858. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32858. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Intravenous hydralazine and labetalol are recommended as first-line anti-hypertensives for controlling severe hypertension in pregnancy. Our study aimed at identifying the most effective drug with minimum side effects for preoperative management of severe hypertension in parturients scheduled for Caesarean delivery (CD). We also studied the effect of these drugs on patients already on oral labetalol in the antenatal period.
A prospective observational study was done on 162 hypertensive parturients scheduled to undergo emergency CD who received hydralazine or labetalol in the preoperative period. Demographic data, booking status, hemodynamic data, time taken to reach adequate control of blood pressure (BP), drug efficacy, the incidence of persistent hypertension, adverse effects associated with the drugs, and maternal and fetal outcomes were noted.
The time taken for the control of BP was similar with both drugs (p-value = 0.425). The mean number of doses required to achieve target BP was significantly less with hydralazine compared to labetalol (p-value = 0.009). Patients on tablet labetalol in the antenatal period were poorly controlled when put on the same drug intravenously but had better control with hydralazine (p-value = 0.005). The incidence of persistent hypertension was lower in patients treated with hydralazine compared with labetalol (p-value = 0.008).
Both drugs took a similar time for BP control. However, hydralazine was more efficacious, produced adequate control of BP in a higher number of patients, and had a lower incidence of persistent hypertension.
静脉注射肼屈嗪和拉贝洛尔被推荐作为控制妊娠期重度高血压的一线抗高血压药物。我们的研究旨在确定用于计划行剖宫产术(CD)的产妇术前重度高血压管理的最有效且副作用最小的药物。我们还研究了这些药物对产前已服用口服拉贝洛尔的患者的影响。
对162例计划行急诊剖宫产术的高血压产妇进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,这些产妇在术前接受了肼屈嗪或拉贝洛尔治疗。记录人口统计学数据、预约状态、血流动力学数据、达到血压(BP)充分控制所需时间、药物疗效、持续性高血压的发生率、与药物相关的不良反应以及母婴结局。
两种药物控制血压所需时间相似(p值 = 0.425)。与拉贝洛尔相比,肼屈嗪达到目标血压所需的平均剂量显著更少(p值 = 0.009)。产前服用拉贝洛尔片的患者静脉使用同一药物时血压控制不佳,但使用肼屈嗪时控制效果更好(p值 = 0.005)。与拉贝洛尔相比,使用肼屈嗪治疗的患者持续性高血压的发生率更低(p值 = 0.008)。
两种药物控制血压所需时间相似。然而,肼屈嗪更有效,能使更多患者的血压得到充分控制,且持续性高血压的发生率更低。