• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HEAR评分:一项仅使用既往病史和心电图数据评估极低风险胸痛患者的提议。

HEAR SCORE: A Proposal to Use Only Anamnestic and EKG Data to Evaluate Patients with Very Low Risk Chest Pain.

作者信息

Mosso Maria Lucia, Montemerani Sara

机构信息

S.C. Medicina e Chirurgia d'Accettazione ed Urgenza (MeCAU) - Pronto Soccorso, Dipartimento Emergenza Urgenza. Ospedale S. Andrea, Vercelli, Italia.

UOC Medicina d'Urgenza e Pronto Soccorso, Dipartimento Emergenza Urgenza. Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo, Italia.

出版信息

Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 19;15:29-36. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S391929. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S391929
PMID:36700006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9869912/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Chest pain in a common symptom in patients attending Emergency Department worldwide and can be related to an extensive variety of disorders, so it represents a diagnostic and logistic challenge for Emergency physicians. The aim of this study is to identify a subgroup of patients with a low pre-test probability of major adverse cardiac events, for which there is no need of troponin testing, to avoid potential harm from false-positive testing and long length stay in ED.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients that attended ED of Siena complaining chest pain from January 2019 to August 2021. We used a modified HEART score, only evaluating history, EKG, age and risk factors. A 0-1 HEAR score was considered at very low risk for adverse cardiac events. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and incidence of adverse cardiac events were calculated. The accuracy of HEAR score was evaluated with ROC curve. The correlation of adverse cardiac events with HEAR score 0-1 was evaluated with Fisher test.

RESULTS

In this study, we included 2046 patients, of which 279 were classified at very low risk. The incidence of adverse cardiac events in this population was 0.36%. Sensibility was 97.5%, sensitivity 61%, PPV 36.8%, NPV 99.1%. The AUC for global accuracy of HEAR score was 0.945. Chi-square's P value for the association between adverse cardiac events and HEAR score 0-1 was <0.001.

CONCLUSION

The draft presented in this study answers to the necessity to make a personalized path for patients attending ED with chest pain. The choice to avoid troponin testing may appear risky, but data from this study and from other similar show that a careful evaluation of clinical data and EKG allows to correctly discriminate which patients will not have adverse cardiac events, reducing the length of stay in ED.

摘要

目的

胸痛是全球急诊科患者的常见症状,可能与多种疾病相关,因此对急诊科医生来说是一项诊断和后勤方面的挑战。本研究的目的是确定一组主要不良心脏事件预检概率较低的患者,这些患者无需进行肌钙蛋白检测,以避免假阳性检测带来的潜在危害以及在急诊科的长时间停留。

患者与方法

我们回顾性分析了2019年1月至2021年8月在锡耶纳急诊科因胸痛就诊的患者数据。我们使用了改良的HEART评分,仅评估病史、心电图、年龄和危险因素。HEAR评分为0 - 1被认为不良心脏事件风险极低。计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和不良心脏事件的发生率。用ROC曲线评估HEAR评分的准确性。用Fisher检验评估不良心脏事件与HEAR评分为0 - 1的相关性。

结果

本研究纳入2046例患者,其中279例被分类为极低风险。该人群中不良心脏事件的发生率为0.36%。敏感性为97.5%,特异性为61%,阳性预测值为36.8%,阴性预测值为99.1%。HEAR评分总体准确性的AUC为0.945。不良心脏事件与HEAR评分为0 - 1之间关联的卡方P值<0.001。

结论

本研究中提出的方案满足了为因胸痛就诊于急诊科的患者制定个性化路径的必要性。避免肌钙蛋白检测的选择可能看似有风险,但本研究及其他类似研究的数据表明,对临床数据和心电图进行仔细评估能够正确区分哪些患者不会发生不良心脏事件,从而缩短在急诊科的停留时间。

相似文献

1
HEAR SCORE: A Proposal to Use Only Anamnestic and EKG Data to Evaluate Patients with Very Low Risk Chest Pain.HEAR评分:一项仅使用既往病史和心电图数据评估极低风险胸痛患者的提议。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 19;15:29-36. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S391929. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of HEAR score to rule-out major adverse cardiac events without troponin test in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.运用 HEAR 评分系统,在急诊科胸痛就诊患者中,无需进行肌钙蛋白检测即可排除主要不良心脏事件。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 1;28(4):292-298. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000791.
3
The feasibility of HEAR score in comparison to Modified HEART score as a risk stratification tool for chest pain patients presented to Emergency Department Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia.马来亚大学医院急诊就诊胸痛患者的 HEAR 评分与改良 HEART 评分作为风险分层工具的比较的可行性。
Med J Malaysia. 2023 Mar;78(2):171-176.
4
The performance of HEAR score for identification of low-risk chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于识别低风险胸痛的HEAR评分的性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 1;29(3):173-187. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000921. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Efficacy of HEAR and HEART score to rule out major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: study protocol of the eCARE stepped-wedge randomised control trial.HEAR 和 HEART 评分对急诊科胸痛患者排除主要不良心脏事件的疗效:eCARE 逐步随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):e066953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066953.
6
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
Validation study of the modified HEART and HEAR scores in patients with chest pain who visit the emergency department.改良HEART和HEAR评分在胸痛急诊患者中的验证研究。
Acute Med Surg. 2020 Nov 7;7(1):e591. doi: 10.1002/ams2.591. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
8
Comparison of HEAR and HEART Scores for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.主要不良心血管事件的HEAR评分与HEART评分比较
Cureus. 2023 Oct 9;15(10):e46721. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46721. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
HEART Score Risk Stratification of Low-Risk Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急诊低危胸痛患者 HEART 评分风险分层:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):187-203. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
Identification of very low-risk acute chest pain patients without troponin testing.不进行肌钙蛋白检测识别极低危急性胸痛患者。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Nov;37(11):690-695. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209698. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of computerized self-reported medical history taking and HEAR score for safe early rule-out of cardiac events in acute chest pain patients: the CLEOS-CPDS prospective cohort study.计算机化自我报告病史采集及HEAR评分在急性胸痛患者心脏事件安全早期排除中的应用:CLEOS-CPDS前瞻性队列研究
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Nov 12;6(1):104-114. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae087. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Assessment and Application of the Hear Score in Remote Emergency Medicine Outposts in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Hear评分在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那远程急救医学前哨站的评估与应用
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 19;60(4):657. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040657.

本文引用的文献

1
External validation of a low HEAR score to identify emergency department chest pain patients at very low risk of major adverse cardiac events without troponin testing.低HEAR评分用于识别无需肌钙蛋白检测、发生重大不良心脏事件风险极低的急诊科胸痛患者的外部验证。
CJEM. 2022 Jan;24(1):68-74. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00159-y. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
2
Identifying Patients with Low Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome Without Troponin Testing: Validation of the HEAR Score.不进行肌钙蛋白检测识别低风险急性冠状动脉综合征患者:HEAR 评分的验证。
Am J Med. 2021 Apr;134(4):499-506.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.09.021. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
National trends in chest pain visits in US emergency departments (2006-2016).
美国急诊科胸痛就诊的全国趋势(2006-2016 年)。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Nov;37(11):696-699. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210306. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
4
Identification of very low-risk acute chest pain patients without troponin testing.不进行肌钙蛋白检测识别极低危急性胸痛患者。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Nov;37(11):690-695. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209698. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
Early identification of patients with chest pain at very low risk of acute myocardial infarction using clinical information and ECG only.仅使用临床信息和心电图对急性心肌梗死风险极低的胸痛患者进行早期识别。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;74(8):e13526. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13526. Epub 2020 May 22.
6
Diagnosis and risk stratification of chest pain patients in the emergency department: focus on acute coronary syndromes. A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association.急诊科胸痛患者的诊断和风险分层:重点关注急性冠状动脉综合征。急性心血管护理协会的立场文件。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Feb;9(1):76-89. doi: 10.1177/2048872619885346. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
Emergency Department Volume and Outcomes for Patients After Chest Pain Assessment.胸痛评估后患者的急诊科就诊量及治疗结果
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Nov;11(11):e004683. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004683.
8
Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.急诊科胸痛:HEART 评分的价值。
Neth Heart J. 2008 Jun;16(6):191-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03086144.