Amasya Üniversitesi Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği, 05200 Amasya, Türkiye.
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023;34(1):196-206. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.902. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the clinical results of patients who underwent medical and surgical treatment for osteosarcoma, to determine the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates, and to examine the effects of prognostic factors on these rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and January 2020, a total of 64 patients (38 males, 26 females; mean age: 20.9±11.5 years; range, 6 to 70 years) who received medical and surgical treatment for osteosarcoma were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, follow-up period, tumor location and size, tumor stage and necrosis rate, metastatic disease, surgical treatments, postoperative complications, local recurrence, and metastasis were recorded. The relationship of these factors with the survival was examined. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 51.6 (range, 3 to 156) months. The most common tumor localization was in the distal femur with 42 (65.6%) patients and the most common histopathological subtypes were conventional osteosarcoma in 50 (78.1%) patients. The OS rates were 91.6% at one year, 65.9% at five years, and 51.6% at 10 years. With the exception of two patients who died during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, all patients underwent surgical treatment. The addition of chemotherapy + radiotherapy in the treatment did not provide any benefits in terms of survival and recurrence compared to the group that was not added, and the five-year OS rate was 79.3% compared to 20.7%, respectively. The overall 10-year survival rates were 83.9% and 37.2% in the group with a good response (≥90%) and poor response (<90%) to treatment (p=0.012). The mean survival time of three patients who presented with pathological fractures was shorter than the others (p>0.05). Surgical margin was ≤2 mm in 27 (42.2%) patients, >2 mm in 30 (46.9%) patients, and surgical margin was positive in five (7.8%) patients. The mean OS in the group with a surgical margin closure of >2 mm was 10.8±1.9 years and was longer than the other groups (p=0.047). CONCLUSION: Metastasis at the time of diagnosis, <90% tumor necrosis, a tumor size of ≥10 cm, and metastasis development were significantly associated with poor survival and were found to be independent prognostic factors. The OS rate in the patient group with Stage III-IV response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy given the cisplatin + doxorubicin protocol was found to be better than those given the European and American Osteosarcoma Studies (EURAMOS) protocol. More research is needed to determine the most optimal chemotherapy protocols in this patient population. In addition, a multidisciplinary approach in treatment is of utmost importance to improve oncological outcomes.
目的:本研究旨在探讨接受骨肉瘤内科和外科治疗的患者的临床结果,确定总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS),并研究预后因素对这些生存率的影响。
方法:2005 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间,回顾性分析了 64 名(38 名男性,26 名女性;平均年龄:20.9±11.5 岁;范围 6 至 70 岁)接受骨肉瘤内科和外科治疗的患者。记录了人口统计学特征、随访期、肿瘤部位和大小、肿瘤分期和坏死率、转移性疾病、手术治疗、术后并发症、局部复发和转移。检查了这些因素与生存之间的关系。
结果:中位随访时间为 51.6(范围 3 至 156)个月。最常见的肿瘤定位在股骨远端,有 42 例(65.6%),最常见的组织病理学亚型为常规骨肉瘤,有 50 例(78.1%)。1 年的 OS 率为 91.6%,5 年的 OS 率为 65.9%,10 年的 OS 率为 51.6%。除了两名在新辅助化疗期间死亡的患者外,所有患者均接受了手术治疗。与未加用组相比,加用化疗+放疗治疗在生存和复发方面没有任何益处,5 年 OS 率分别为 79.3%和 20.7%。治疗反应良好(≥90%)和不良(<90%)的两组患者的 10 年总生存率分别为 83.9%和 37.2%(p=0.012)。出现病理骨折的 3 例患者的平均生存时间短于其他患者(p>0.05)。27 例(42.2%)患者的手术切缘≤2mm,30 例(46.9%)患者的手术切缘>2mm,5 例(7.8%)患者的手术切缘阳性。手术切缘>2mm 组的平均 OS 为 10.8±1.9 年,长于其他组(p=0.047)。
结论:诊断时转移、肿瘤坏死率<90%、肿瘤大小≥10cm 和转移发展与不良生存显著相关,是独立的预后因素。接受顺铂+多柔比星新辅助化疗方案的 III-IV 期反应患者的 OS 率优于接受欧美骨肉瘤研究(EURAMOS)方案的患者。需要进一步研究确定该患者人群中最有效的化疗方案。此外,治疗中多学科方法的应用对于改善肿瘤学结果至关重要。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017-3
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2024
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024-11
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022-2-22
Sarcoma. 2021-12-6
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020-12
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020