Suppr超能文献

数据驱动服务策略在平台竞争中的作用:系统性能视角。

The role of data-driven services strategy in platform competition: A system performance perspective.

机构信息

College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Zhejiang College, Jinhua, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0272547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272547. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

In the era of big data, data-driven services (DDS) have become critical competitive strategies for digital platform-based enterprises. This paper considers two operational modes of e-commerce platforms, which are self-operated and third-party modes, respectively, and they each lead a platform system. The Hotelling model is adopted to describe the competitive market of both platforms. We characterize their system performance functions. The optimization models are built using game theory to discuss the DDS and price decisions. We obtain the implementation conditions of DDS strategies for both platforms and the dominant situations of their respective DDS levels. We find that a platform adopting the price reduction strategy can improve the performance of its platform system while reducing the competitor's system performance. From the system performance perspective, continuous improvement of the DDS level may appear "harming others may not benefit oneself"; that is, continuously improving the DDS level leads to a decrease in the competitor's system performance but not necessarily an increase in its system performance. Further, consumer welfare within both platform systems shows the law of "as one falls then another rises". As the big data industry matures, self-operated platforms would demonstrate the advantages of service level, profit, and system performance. In contrast, third-party platforms would have an advantage in consumer welfare. These conclusions have important implications for e-commerce platforms developing data-driven operations-based strategies.

摘要

在大数据时代,数据驱动的服务(DDS)已成为数字平台企业的关键竞争策略。本文考虑了电子商务平台的两种运营模式,即自营和第三方模式,它们分别领导一个平台系统。采用 Hotelling 模型来描述两个平台的竞争市场。我们刻画了它们的系统绩效函数。使用博弈论构建优化模型来讨论 DDS 和价格决策。我们得到了两个平台的 DDS 策略的实施条件以及各自 DDS 水平的主导情况。我们发现,采用降价策略的平台可以提高其平台系统的绩效,同时降低竞争对手的系统绩效。从系统绩效的角度来看,持续提高 DDS 水平可能会出现“损人不利己”的情况,即持续提高 DDS 水平会导致竞争对手的系统绩效下降,但不一定会提高自己的系统绩效。此外,两个平台系统内的消费者福利都呈现出“此消彼长”的规律。随着大数据产业的成熟,自营平台将在服务水平、利润和系统绩效方面表现出优势。相比之下,第三方平台在消费者福利方面具有优势。这些结论对于电子商务平台制定基于数据驱动的运营策略具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b6/9879479/2dbf278e48a8/pone.0272547.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验