Pearlman Shapiro Marit, Dethier Divya, Kahili-Heede Melissa, Kaneshiro Bliss
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, and the Health Sciences Library, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):23-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005016. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
To summarize the effectiveness and safety outcomes of medication abortion performed without prior pelvic examination or ultrasonogram ("no-test medication abortion").
We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane (including ClinicalTrials.gov), CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, and CAB Direct databases to identify relevant studies published before April 2022 using a peer-reviewed search strategy including terms such as "medication abortion" and "ultrasonography." We contacted experts in the field for unpublished data and ongoing studies.
We reviewed 2,423 studies using Colandr. We included studies if they presented clinical outcomes of medication abortion performed with mifepristone and misoprostol and without prior pelvic examination or ultrasonogram. We excluded studies with duplicate data. We abstracted successful abortion rates overall, as well as rates by gestational age through 63 days, 70 days and past 84 days. We abstracted complication rates, including the need for surgical evacuation, additional medications, blood transfusion, and ectopic pregnancy.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: We included 21 studies with a total of 10,693 patients with outcome data reported. The overall efficacy of no-test medication abortion was 96.4%; 93.8% (95% CI 92.8-94.6%) through 63 days of gestation and 95.2% (95% CI 94.7-95.7%) through 70 days of gestation. The overall rate of surgical evacuation was 4.4% (95% CI 4.0-4.9), need for additional misoprostol 2.2% (95% CI 1.8-2.6), blood transfusion 0.5% (95% CI 0.3-0.6), and ectopic pregnancy 0.06% (95% CI 0.02-0.15).
Medication abortion performed without prior pelvic examination or ultrasonogram is a safe and effective option for pregnancy termination.
PROSPERO, CRD42021240739.
总结在未进行盆腔检查或超声检查的情况下进行药物流产(“无检查药物流产”)的有效性和安全性结果。
我们检索了MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane(包括ClinicalTrials.gov)、CINAHL、全球医学索引和CAB Direct数据库,以使用包括“药物流产”和“超声检查”等术语的同行评审搜索策略来识别2022年4月之前发表的相关研究。我们联系了该领域的专家以获取未发表的数据和正在进行的研究。
我们使用Colandr对2423项研究进行了审查。如果研究呈现了使用米非司酮和米索前列醇进行药物流产且未进行盆腔检查或超声检查的临床结果,我们就纳入该研究。我们排除了有重复数据的研究。我们提取了总体成功流产率,以及妊娠63天、70天和超过84天的按孕周划分的流产率。我们提取了并发症发生率,包括手术清宫的需求、额外使用药物、输血和异位妊娠的发生率。
制表、整合与结果:我们纳入了21项研究,共有10693名患者报告了结局数据。无检查药物流产的总体有效率为96.4%;妊娠63天时为93.8%(95%置信区间92.8 - 94.6%),妊娠70天时为95.2%(95%置信区间94.7 - 95.7%)。手术清宫的总体发生率为4.4%(95%置信区间4.0 - 4.9),需要额外使用米索前列醇的发生率为2.2%(95%置信区间1.8 - 2.6),输血发生率为0.5%(95%置信区间0.3 - 0.6),异位妊娠发生率为0.06%(95%置信区间0.02 - 0.15)。
在未进行盆腔检查或超声检查的情况下进行药物流产是终止妊娠的一种安全有效的选择。
PROSPERO,CRD42021240739