Suppr超能文献

用于尿失禁的数字治疗设备:6个月和12个月的纵向分析

Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Longitudinal Analysis at 6 and 12 Months.

作者信息

Weinstein Milena M, Dunivan Gena C, Guaderrama Noelani M, Richter Holly E

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; the Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine, California; and the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):199-206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005036. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of an 8-week regimen of pelvic floor muscle training guided by a motion-based digital therapeutic device compared with a standard home program in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI).

METHODS

The primary virtual trial was conducted from October 2020 to March 2021; 363 women with SUI or stress-predominant MUI were randomized to complete pelvic floor muscle training using the device (intervention group) or a standard home pelvic floor muscle training program (control group) for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes included change in UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory, Short Form) score and SUI episodes on a 3-day bladder diary. The PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) was also assessed, with "much better" and "very much better" responses considered as improvement. In this planned secondary analysis, symptom and adherence data were collected in follow-up at 6 and 12 months. A modified intention-to-treat analysis was performed using Student's t tests and χ2 tests as appropriate.

RESULTS

Of 299 participants analyzed at 8 weeks, 286 (95.7%) returned 6- and 12-month data (151 in the control group, 135 in the intervention group). Mean age was 51.9±12.8 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 31.8±7.4; 84.6% of participants were parous, and 54.9% were postmenopausal. Mean change in UDI-6 score from baseline to 6 and 12 months was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group (20.2±20.9 vs 14.8±19.5, P=.03 and 22.7±23.3 vs 15.9±20.3, P=.01, respectively). Participants in the intervention group had more than twice the odds of reporting improvement on the PGI-I compared with participants in the control group (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.49-4.00).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic floor muscle training guided by a motion-based digital therapeutic device yielded significantly greater urinary incontinence symptom improvement compared with a standard home pelvic floor muscle training program at 6 and 12 months, although continued improvement waned over time. This technology may facilitate pelvic floor muscle training access and adherence for women with SUI and stress-predominant MUI and represents an effective modality for scaling first-line care.

FUNDING SOURCE

Renovia Inc.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04508153.

摘要

目的

评估基于运动的数字治疗设备指导的8周盆底肌训练方案与标准家庭方案相比,在治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)和以压力性为主的混合性尿失禁(MUI)方面的长期疗效。

方法

主要虚拟试验于2020年10月至2021年3月进行;363例SUI或压力性为主的MUI女性被随机分配,使用该设备完成盆底肌训练(干预组)或标准家庭盆底肌训练方案(对照组),为期8周。主要结局包括UDI-6(简明泌尿生殖系统困扰量表)评分的变化以及3天膀胱日记中的SUI发作次数。还评估了PGI-I(患者总体改善印象),将“好多了”和“非常好多了”的回答视为改善。在这项计划的二次分析中,在6个月和12个月的随访中收集症状和依从性数据。使用学生t检验和χ2检验进行适当的改良意向性分析。

结果

在8周时分析的299名参与者中,286名(95.7%)返回了6个月和12个月的数据(对照组151名,干预组135名)。平均年龄为51.9±12.8岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为31.8±7.4;84.6%的参与者为经产妇,54.9%为绝经后女性。从基线到6个月和12个月,干预组UDI-6评分的平均变化显著大于对照组(分别为20.2±20.9对vs 14.8±19.5,P = 0.03;以及22.7±23.3对vs 15.9±20.3,P = 0.01)。与对照组参与者相比,干预组参与者报告PGI-I改善的几率是对照组的两倍多(OR 2.45,95%CI 1.49 - 4.00)。

结论

与标准家庭盆底肌训练方案相比,基于运动的数字治疗设备指导的盆底肌训练在6个月和12个月时尿失禁症状改善显著更大,尽管随着时间的推移持续改善有所减弱。这项技术可能有助于SUI和以压力性为主的MUI女性获得盆底肌训练并提高依从性,是扩大一线护理的有效方式。

资金来源

Renovia公司。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04508153。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验