Suppr超能文献

优先考虑干预领域以预防心血管疾病:使用全球疾病负担和本地数据进行的国家级案例研究。

Prioritization of intervention domains to prevent cardiovascular disease: a country-level case study using global burden of disease and local data.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Popul Health Metr. 2023 Jan 26;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12963-023-00301-1.

Abstract

AIM

We aimed to combine Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study data and local data to identify the highest priority intervention domains for preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the case study country of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ).

METHODS

Risk factor data for CVD in NZ were extracted from the GBD using the "GBD Results Tool." We prioritized risk factor domains based on consideration of the size of the health burden (disability-adjusted life years [DALYs]) and then by the domain-specific interventions that delivered the highest health gains and cost-savings.

RESULTS

Based on the size of the CVD health burden in DALYs, the five top prioritized risk factor domains were: high systolic blood pressure (84,800 DALYs; 5400 deaths in 2019), then dietary risk factors, then high LDL cholesterol, then high BMI and then tobacco (30,400 DALYs; 1400 deaths). But if policy-makers aimed to maximize health gain and cost-savings from specific interventions that have been studied, then they would favor the dietary risk domain (e.g., a combined fruit and vegetable subsidy plus a sugar tax produced estimated lifetime savings of 894,000 health-adjusted life years and health system cost-savings of US$11.0 billion; both 3% discount rate). Other potential considerations for prioritization included the potential for total health gain that includes non-CVD health loss and potential for achieving relatively greater per capita health gain for Māori (Indigenous) to reduce health inequities.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to show how CVD risk factor domains could be systematically prioritized using a mix of GBD and country-level data. Addressing high systolic blood pressure would be the top ranked domain if policy-makers focused just on the size of the health loss. But if policy-makers wished to maximize health gain and cost-savings using evaluated interventions, dietary interventions would be prioritized, e.g., food taxes and subsidies.

摘要

目的

我们旨在结合全球疾病负担(GBD)研究数据和本地数据,确定在新西兰(NZ)案例研究国家预防心血管疾病(CVD)的最高优先干预领域。

方法

使用“GBD 结果工具”从 GBD 中提取新西兰 CVD 的风险因素数据。我们根据健康负担(残疾调整生命年[DALYs])的大小对风险因素领域进行优先级排序,然后根据特定领域的干预措施提供的最高健康收益和成本节约来进行排序。

结果

根据 CVD 健康负担的 DALY 大小,五个优先考虑的风险因素领域是:高血压收缩压(84800DALY;2019 年 5400 例死亡),其次是饮食风险因素,然后是 LDL 胆固醇升高,然后是 BMI 升高,最后是烟草(30400DALY;1400 例死亡)。但是,如果政策制定者旨在从已研究的特定干预措施中获得最大的健康收益和成本节约,那么他们会倾向于选择饮食风险领域(例如,水果和蔬菜补贴加上糖税的综合措施预计会产生 894000 个健康调整生命年的终生节省和 110 亿美元的卫生系统成本节约;两者的 3%贴现率)。其他可能的优先考虑因素包括包括非 CVD 健康损失的总健康收益潜力以及实现毛利人(土著)人均健康收益相对较大的潜力,以减少健康不平等。

结论

我们能够展示如何使用 GBD 和国家层面的数据系统地对 CVD 风险因素领域进行优先级排序。如果政策制定者仅关注健康损失的大小,那么解决高血压收缩压问题将是排名最高的领域。但是,如果政策制定者希望通过评估干预措施来最大化健康收益和成本节约,那么饮食干预措施将是优先考虑的,例如食品税和补贴。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b4/9878816/dad2a04e155b/12963_2023_301_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验