Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Department of Neurology, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023 Aug;43(8):1317-1327. doi: 10.1177/0271678X231153728. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) can be derived from spontaneous oscillations in arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF). Transcranial Doppler (TCD) measures CBF-velocity and is commonly used to assess dCA. Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is a promising optical technique for non-invasive CBF monitoring, so here we aimed to validate DCS as a tool for quantifying dCA. In 33 healthy adults and 17 acute ischemic stroke patients, resting-state hemodynamic were monitored simultaneously with high-speed (20 Hz) DCS and TCD. dCA parameters were calcaulated by a transfer function analysis using a Fourier decomposition of ABP and CBF (or CBF-velocity). Strong correlation was found between DCS and TCD measured gain (magnitude of regulation) in healthy volunteers (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) and stroke patients (r = 0.76, p = 0.003). DCS-gain retained strong test-retest reliability in both groups (ICC 0.87 and 0.82, respectively). DCS and TCD-derived phase (latency of regulation) did not significantly correlate in healthy volunteers (r = 0.12, p = 0.50) but moderately correlated in stroke patients (r = 0.65, p = 0.006). DCS-derived phase was reproducible in both groups (ICC 0.88 and 0.90, respectively). High-frequency DCS is a promising non-invasive bedside technique that can be leveraged to quantify dCA from resting-state data, but the discrepancy between TCD and DCS-derived phase requires further investigation.
动态脑自动调节(dCA)可以从动脉血压(ABP)和脑血流(CBF)的自发波动中得出。经颅多普勒(TCD)测量 CBF 速度,常用于评估 dCA。扩散相关光谱(DCS)是一种有前途的非侵入性 CBF 监测光学技术,因此我们旨在验证 DCS 作为量化 dCA 的工具。在 33 名健康成年人和 17 名急性缺血性卒中患者中,使用高速(20 Hz)DCS 和 TCD 同时监测静息状态血流动力学。使用 ABP 和 CBF(或 CBF 速度)的傅立叶分解对传递函数分析计算 dCA 参数。在健康志愿者(r=0.73,p<0.001)和卒中患者(r=0.76,p=0.003)中,DCS 和 TCD 测量的增益(调节幅度)之间存在很强的相关性。DCS 增益在两组中均具有很强的测试-再测试可靠性(ICC 分别为 0.87 和 0.82)。在健康志愿者中,DCS 和 TCD 衍生的相位(调节的潜伏期)没有显著相关性(r=0.12,p=0.50),但在卒中患者中呈中度相关性(r=0.65,p=0.006)。DCS 衍生的相位在两组中均具有可重复性(ICC 分别为 0.88 和 0.90)。高频 DCS 是一种很有前途的非侵入性床边技术,可用于从静息状态数据中量化 dCA,但 TCD 和 DCS 衍生相位之间的差异需要进一步研究。