• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同方法根管预备后根管内残留碎屑及玷污层的评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究

Evaluation of Residual Debris and Smear layer After Root Canal Preparation by Three Different Methods: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.

作者信息

Zargar Nazanin, Naseri Mandana, Gholizadeh Zeynab, Mehrabinia Pegah

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran.

Dentist, Private Practice, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2022 Summer;17(3):138-145. doi: 10.22037/iej.v17i3.36525.

DOI:10.22037/iej.v17i3.36525
PMID:36704081
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9869003/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the amount of debris and smear layer remaining followed chemomechanical preparation using three systems: ProTaper Universal, reciprocating SafeSider, and hand K-Flexofiles with scanning electron microscope (SEM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-five mandibular molars with mesiobuccal canal curvature (25 to 40) were extracted and divided into one control group (=5), and three experimental groups (=20) according to the preparation method; K-Flexofile, ProTaper Universal and SafeSider instruments. All canals were irrigated with 3 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution and 3 mL of 17% EDTA. Subsequently, the canals were irrigated with 5 ml of normal saline. Then the teeth were examined under the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn-Q Bonferroni, and Friedman tests were used for statistical analysis of results.

RESULTS

To assess the accumulation of debris, statistically significant differences were observed only in the coronal area among ProTaper Universal, SafeSider, K-Flexofile, and the control group. (=0.029). To evaluate the residual smear layer amount, statistically significant differences were observed only in the coronal and middle areas, following the preparation of the canals using ProTaper Universal, SafeSider, and hand K-Flexofiles and control groups (=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the present study, we can declare that the canals were utterly cleaned of debris and smear layer in none of the groups. Manual Flexofile and ProTaper Universal groups result in cleaner canal walls than reciprocal SafeSider, in the coronal and middle thirds.

摘要

引言

本研究使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究了使用三种系统进行化学机械预备后残留的碎屑和玷污层的量:ProTaper Universal、往复式SafeSider和手动K-Flex锉。

材料与方法

拔除65颗近中颊根管弯曲度为25至40的下颌磨牙,并根据预备方法分为1个对照组(n = 5)和3个试验组(n = 20);K-Flex锉、ProTaper Universal和SafeSider器械。所有根管均用3 ml 5.25%次氯酸钠溶液和3 ml 17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗。随后,用5 ml生理盐水冲洗根管。然后在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下检查牙齿。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、Dunn-Q Bonferroni检验和Friedman检验对结果进行统计学分析。

结果

为评估碎屑的堆积情况,仅在ProTaper Universal、SafeSider、K-Flex锉和对照组的冠部区域观察到统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.029)。为评估残留玷污层的量,在使用ProTaper Universal、SafeSider和手动K-Flex锉预备根管后,仅在冠部和中部区域观察到与对照组相比有统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.019)。

结论

基于本研究,我们可以宣称,在所有组中,根管均未完全清除碎屑和玷污层。在冠部和中三分之一区域,手动Flex锉组和ProTaper Universal组的根管壁比往复式SafeSider组更清洁。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba04/9869003/26a553d3b811/IEJ-17-138-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba04/9869003/f5ae77c00da8/IEJ-17-138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba04/9869003/5a9364989414/IEJ-17-138-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba04/9869003/26a553d3b811/IEJ-17-138-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba04/9869003/f5ae77c00da8/IEJ-17-138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba04/9869003/5a9364989414/IEJ-17-138-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba04/9869003/26a553d3b811/IEJ-17-138-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Residual Debris and Smear layer After Root Canal Preparation by Three Different Methods: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.三种不同方法根管预备后根管内残留碎屑及玷污层的评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Iran Endod J. 2022 Summer;17(3):138-145. doi: 10.22037/iej.v17i3.36525.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.使用扫描电子显微镜对手动与旋转ProTaper技术联合制备的根管壁上的玷污层和碎屑进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):574-81.
3
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.使用ProTaper和Hero Shaper器械联合次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗后残留碎屑和玷污层的扫描电子显微镜评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):e63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.032. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
4
Smear Layer Evaluation on Root Canal Preparation with Manual and Rotary Techniques using EDTA as an Irrigant: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.使用乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)作为冲洗剂,采用手动和旋转技术进行根管预备时的玷污层评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Feb;5(1):66-78. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
5
Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.与旋转式GT和手动K-Flex锉相比,旋转式ProTaper的清洁效果和成形能力
Am J Dent. 2006 Dec;19(6):353-8.
6
A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.使用AET器械和K型锉后残留碎屑及玷污层的扫描电子显微镜研究
Stomatologija. 2006;8(3):70-5.
7
Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study.根管预备的锥度和直径对根管清洁度的影响:扫描电镜研究。
Int Endod J. 2019 Mar;52(3):343-351. doi: 10.1111/iej.13002. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
8
Evaluation of Root Canal Cleaning and Shaping Efficacy of Three Engine-driven Instruments: SafeSider, ProTaper Universal and Lightspeed LSX.三种机用器械(SafeSider、ProTaper Universal和Lightspeed LSX)根管清理和预备效果的评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Nov 1;16(11):910-4. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1780.
9
Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.旋转镍钛K3器械与不锈钢手动K-Flex锉的效率比较。第2部分。拔除牙齿严重弯曲根管的清洁效果和成形能力。
Int Endod J. 2003 Mar;36(3):208-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00644.x.
10
Evaluation of surface preparation and maintenance of canal curvature following instrumentation with hand 'K' file and three different Ni-Ti rotary systems: A radiographic and SEM study.使用手动“K”锉和三种不同镍钛旋转系统进行根管预备后根管弯曲度的表面预备及维持情况评估:一项影像学和扫描电子显微镜研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2010 Apr;1(2):88-93. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.68599.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning Ability of Gentlefile Rotary System Compared with Three Alternative Brands.Gentlefile旋转系统与三个替代品牌的清洁能力比较。
Iran Endod J. 2024;19(4):270-277. doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i4.45012.

本文引用的文献

1
Smear Layer Removal from the Apical Third Using the Er,Cr:YSGG Photon-induced Photoacoustic Streaming.使用铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光光子诱导光声流去除根尖三分之一处的玷污层。
Iran Endod J. 2021 Fall;16(4):238-243. doi: 10.22037/iej.v16i4.34544.
2
Comparison of Mechanical and Structural Properties of Nickel-titanium Alloy with Titanium-molybdenum Alloy and Titanium-niobium Alloy as Potential Metals for Endodontic Files.镍钛合金与钛钼合金及钛铌合金作为根管锉潜在金属材料的力学性能和结构性能比较
Iran Endod J. 2021;16(1):49-55. doi: 10.22037/iej.v16i1.24048.
3
Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal.
微计算机断层扫描评估玷污层和累积硬组织碎屑的清除情况。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 May-Jun;23(3):249-253. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_293_20. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
4
Comparison of cleaning effectiveness of single rotary file OneShape and reciprocating F2 Protaper with Protaper Universal sequence: A SEM analysis.单支旋转锉OneShape与往复式F2 Protaper配合Protaper通用序列的清洁效果比较:扫描电子显微镜分析
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):337-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
5
The effect of 17% EDTA and QMiX ultrasonic activation on smear layer removal and sealer penetration: ex vivo study.17%EDTA 和 QMiX 超声激活对玷污层去除和密封剂渗透的影响:离体研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 25;10(1):10311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67303-z.
6
The effects of various irrigation protocols on root canal wall adaptation and apical microleakage in primary teeth.不同冲洗方案对乳牙髓腔壁适应性和根尖微渗漏的影响。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2020 Jul;78(5):321-326. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1709890. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
7
Comparative Analysis of Dentinal Crack Formation Following Root Canal Instrumentation with Hand K-Flex Files, ProTaper Next, and Self-adjusting Files.使用手动 K-Flex 锉、ProTaper Next 和自调式锉进行根管预备后牙本质裂纹形成的比较分析
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):935-939.
8
A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education.在临床前牙科教育中使用Protaper通用型和Protaper Next旋转锉进行根管预备的比较研究。
PeerJ. 2019 Aug 19;7:e7419. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7419. eCollection 2019.
9
effect of XP-Endo finisher on the amount of residual debris and smear layer on the root canal walls.XP根管锉对根管壁上残余碎屑和玷污层数量的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 May-Jun;16(3):179-184.
10
The effect of final irrigation with MTAD, QMix, and EDTA on smear layer removal and mineral content of root canal dentin.MTAD、QMix和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)进行根管最终冲洗对玷污层去除及根管牙本质矿物质含量的影响
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Jun;82(6):923-930. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23239. Epub 2019 Feb 20.