Hatami Nima, Shahravan Arash, Rouzpeykar Marzieh, Nekouei Amir Hossein, Sharifi Maryam
Endodontology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Kerman Dental School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Iran Endod J. 2022 Summer;17(3):121-125. doi: 10.22037/iej.v17i3.37827.
The levels of evidence (LOE) of dental education texts is critical from the educational point of view. The present study aimed to evaluate the levels of evidence of references used in three clinical chapters in the textbook .
MATERIAL & METHOD: The references of three clinical chapters in the text book were assessed in five of its editions. The levels of evidence were ranked according to study type and the Oxford scale from 0 to 5. The chi-square test was used to compare the level of evidence between different editions of the "Retreatment," "Trauma," and "Surgery" chapters.
A total of 3656 references were reviewed and analyzed from the "Trauma" (928 references), "Re-treatment" (1906 references), and "Surgery" (822 references) chapters in the 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, and 2016 editions. The percentage of the LOE 0 (no evidence) was high (>60%) in all three chapters in all editions (<0.001). The levels of evidence had the same distribution in all editions (=0.871). The LOE of the "Re-treatment" (=0.044) and "Surgery" (<0.001) chapters changed in some editions.
The majority of references in the three clinical chapters of the book are low-level evidence. Encouragement policies for researchers to conduct studies with high LOE are necessary.
从教育角度来看,牙科教育文本的证据水平至关重要。本研究旨在评估教科书中三个临床章节所引用参考文献的证据水平。
对该教科书三个临床章节的参考文献在其五个版本中进行了评估。根据研究类型和牛津量表将证据水平从0到5进行排名。采用卡方检验比较“再治疗”“创伤”和“手术”章节不同版本之间的证据水平。
对1998年、2002年、2006年、2011年和2016年版本中“创伤”(928条参考文献)、“再治疗”(1906条参考文献)和“手术”(822条参考文献)章节的总共3656条参考文献进行了审查和分析。在所有版本的所有三个章节中,证据水平为0(无证据)的百分比都很高(>60%)(<0.001)。所有版本中证据水平的分布相同(=0.871)。“再治疗”(=0.044)和“手术”(<0.001)章节的证据水平在某些版本中发生了变化。
该书中三个临床章节的大多数参考文献证据水平较低。有必要出台鼓励政策促使研究人员开展具有高证据水平的研究。