Suppr超能文献

作为向欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)通报的有意添加到食品或饲料中的合格安全推定(QPS)推荐微生物制剂清单的更新:截至2022年9月向EFSA通报的分类单元的适用性。

Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 17: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2022.

作者信息

Koutsoumanis Konstantinos, Allende Ana, Alvarez-Ordóñez Avelino, Bolton Declan, Bover-Cid Sara, Chemaly Marianne, De Cesare Alessandra, Hilbert Friederike, Lindqvist Roland, Nauta Maarten, Peixe Luísa, Ru Giuseppe, Simmons Marion, Skandamis Panagiotis, Suffredini Elisabetta, Cocconcelli Pier Sandro, Escámez Pablo Salvador Fernández, Maradona Miguel Prieto, Querol Amparo, Sijtsma Lolke, Suarez Juan Evaristo, Sundh Ingvar, Vlak Just, Barizzone Fulvio, Correia Sandra, Herman Lieve

出版信息

EFSA J. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):e07746. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7746. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach was developed to provide a regularly updated generic pre-evaluation of the safety of microorganisms, intended for use in the food or feed chains, to support the work of EFSA's Scientific Panels. The QPS approach is based on an assessment of published data for each agent, with respect to its taxonomic identity, the body of relevant knowledge and safety concerns. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible, confirmed at the species/strain or product level and reflected by 'qualifications'. In the period covered by this Statement, new information was found leading to the withdrawal of the qualification 'absence of aminoglycoside production ability' for The qualification for was changed to 'absence of bacitracin production ability'. For the other TUs, no new information was found that would change the status of previously recommended QPS TUs. Of 52 microorganisms notified to EFSA between April and September 2022 (inclusive), 48 were not evaluated because: 7 were filamentous fungi, 3 were , 2 were , 1 was spp., and 35 were taxonomic units (TUs) that already have a QPS status. The other four TUs notified within this period, and one notified previously as a different species, which was recently reclassified, were evaluated for the first time for a possible QPS status: spp. could not be assessed because it was not identified to the species level; is recommended for QPS status with the qualification 'absence of toxigenic activity'. is not recommended for QPS status. is proposed for QPS status with the qualification 'for production purposes only'. (new species) is included in the QPS list.

摘要

合格安全推定(QPS)方法旨在对用于食品或饲料链的微生物安全性进行定期更新的通用预评估,以支持欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)各科学小组的工作。QPS方法基于对每种微生物已发表数据的评估,涉及分类身份、相关知识体系和安全问题。针对一个分类单元(TU)确定的安全问题,尽可能在物种/菌株或产品层面得到确认,并通过“限定条件”体现出来。在本声明所涵盖的期间,发现了新信息,导致撤销了对“无氨基糖苷生产能力”的限定条件;对的限定条件改为“无杆菌肽生产能力”。对于其他分类单元,未发现会改变先前推荐的QPS分类单元状态的新信息。在2022年4月至9月(含)期间通知EFSA的52种微生物中,48种未进行评估,原因如下:7种为丝状真菌,3种为,2种为,1种为spp.,35种为已具有QPS状态的分类单元(TU)。在此期间通知的其他四个分类单元,以及之前作为不同物种通知、最近重新分类的一个分类单元,首次被评估是否可能具有QPS状态:spp. 因未鉴定到物种水平而无法评估;推荐给予QPS状态,限定条件为“无产毒活性”;不推荐给予QPS状态;提议给予QPS状态,限定条件为“仅用于生产目的”;(新物种)被列入QPS名单。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Oral mitis group streptococci: A silent majority in our oral cavity.口腔轻链球菌:我们口腔中沉默的大多数。
Microbiol Immunol. 2022 Dec;66(12):539-551. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.13028. Epub 2022 Oct 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验