Van Pham Khoa, Kim Khuc Ngan
Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, Phu Nhuan District Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Iran Endod J. 2020 Winter;15(1):12-17. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i1.26720.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and two electronic apex locators (EALs) when measuring the actual length of root canals.
One hundred and eighty four root canals in 135 extracted anterior and posterior permanent teeth were studied. Root canal curvatures were analyzed on CBCT images, and root canals with curvatures less than 70 were chosen. Root canal length measurements were performed using CBCT, ProPex Pixi, E-Pex Pro, and the actual length (AL). The percentages of the measurements in the range of ±0.5 mm to the AL were compared using Fisher's Exact test. The ICC indices and Bland-Altman plots were used to display the agreement of three devices with the AL measurements. The statistical significance was set at <0.05.
The accuracies of E-Pex Pro and ProPex Pixi (87.5% and 82.6%, respectively) were better than that of CBCT (71.7%) (<0.05).
This study showed that although the accuracies of the two EALs were at high level, there was no device that had an agreement with the actual root canal length measurement.
本研究的目的是评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和两种电子根尖定位仪(EAL)在测量根管实际长度时的准确性。
对135颗拔除的恒牙的184个根管进行了研究。在CBCT图像上分析根管弯曲度,选择弯曲度小于70的根管。使用CBCT、ProPex Pixi、E-Pex Pro和实际长度(AL)进行根管长度测量。使用Fisher精确检验比较测量值在AL的±0.5mm范围内的百分比。使用组内相关系数(ICC)指标和Bland-Altman图来显示三种设备与AL测量值的一致性。统计学显著性设定为<0.05。
E-Pex Pro和ProPex Pixi的准确性(分别为87.5%和82.6%)优于CBCT(71.7%)(<0.05)。
本研究表明,尽管两种EAL的准确性处于较高水平,但没有一种设备与实际根管长度测量结果一致。