• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

思维类型共存作为持续注意任务中的一种注意状态。

Coexistence of thought types as an attentional state during a sustained attention task.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Keio University, 2-15-45 Mita, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 108-8345, Japan.

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Kojimachi Business Center Building, 5-3-1, Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0083, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 28;13(1):1581. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28690-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-28690-1
PMID:36709372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9884194/
Abstract

Some studies have asked participants about attentional state on a scale from on-task to off-task, which set the middle option as attention focused on both, including the possibility of the coexistence of thoughts. In addition, studies using multidimensional probes explicitly assumed coexistence within spontaneous thoughts and task-focus dimensions. Although several studies have assumed the coexistence of some thought dimensions, none has explored whether these are different types of thoughts (task-focus, mind-wandering, task-related, external stimuli-related). To examine whether this coexistence of thought types occurred, we used thought probes to determine the degree of immersion in each. The participants responded to probes presented at random during a sustained attention task. The results revealed a mixture of thought types in many self-reports. In addition, the state of attentional allocation behind self-reports was estimated using the hidden Markov model. We observed the following attentional states: task-focused, task-unrelated, task-related, external stimuli-focused, and task-focused-but also focused on other thoughts. These results suggest that individuals can simultaneously allocate attention to thought types and discriminate between reporting. In some cases, probe options should also be considered for this coexistence. We also examined the relationship between self-reports and behavioral indexes, and discussed the necessity of separately measuring the degree of immersion for each thought type.

摘要

一些研究在关注状态量表上询问参与者,从专注到不专注,其中间选项是同时关注两者,包括可能同时存在的想法。此外,使用多维探针的研究明确假设自发思维和任务焦点维度内的共存。尽管有几项研究假设了某些思维维度的共存,但没有一项研究探讨这些思维类型是否不同(任务焦点、走神、与任务相关、与外部刺激相关)。为了检查这些思维类型是否共存,我们使用思维探针来确定每种思维的沉浸程度。参与者在持续注意力任务中随机回答探针。结果表明,许多自我报告中存在多种思维类型的混合。此外,还使用隐马尔可夫模型估计了自我报告背后的注意力分配状态。我们观察到以下注意力状态:任务聚焦、任务不相关、任务相关、外部刺激聚焦和任务聚焦但也关注其他想法。这些结果表明,个体可以同时分配注意力到思维类型并进行报告区分。在某些情况下,也应该考虑探针选项来考虑这种共存。我们还检查了自我报告与行为指标之间的关系,并讨论了分别测量每种思维类型的沉浸程度的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2360/9884194/b21a324f1469/41598_2023_28690_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2360/9884194/466bd49745c6/41598_2023_28690_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2360/9884194/1acf8bc24a67/41598_2023_28690_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2360/9884194/f57c9392d20e/41598_2023_28690_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2360/9884194/b21a324f1469/41598_2023_28690_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2360/9884194/466bd49745c6/41598_2023_28690_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2360/9884194/1acf8bc24a67/41598_2023_28690_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2360/9884194/f57c9392d20e/41598_2023_28690_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2360/9884194/b21a324f1469/41598_2023_28690_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Coexistence of thought types as an attentional state during a sustained attention task.思维类型共存作为持续注意任务中的一种注意状态。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 28;13(1):1581. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28690-1.
2
Experience sampling of the degree of mind wandering distinguishes hidden attentional states.体验抽样法可区分出注意的隐性状态。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104380. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104380. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Influence of content and intensity of thought on behavioral and pupil changes during active mind-wandering, off-focus, and on-task states.主动走神、注意力分散和专注任务状态下思维内容和强度对行为及瞳孔变化的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):1125-1135. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01865-7.
4
Integration and segregation across large-scale intrinsic brain networks as a marker of sustained attention and task-unrelated thought.大规模内在大脑网络的整合与分离作为持续注意力和与任务无关思维的标志物。
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 1;229:117610. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117610. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands.思维漫游探测作为思维漫游的来源,取决于注意力控制的需求。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Aug;103:103355. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103355. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
6
The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it?思维探针对表现的影响:如果让你思考,你的思维会更漫游吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):367-373. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1529-3.
7
Examining the effects of probe frequency, response options, and framing within the thought-probe method.探讨思维探测法中探测频率、反应选项和框架的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):398-408. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01212-6.
8
Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways.心流,我该如何用探针来测量你?让我数一数有多少种方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Apr;50(2):642-661. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9.
9
Dissociating the freely-moving thought dimension of mind-wandering from the intentionality and task-unrelated thought dimensions.将游离思维的自由移动维度与意向性和任务无关的思维维度区分开来。
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2599-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01419-9. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
Predicting task-general mind-wandering with EEG.利用脑电图预测一般任务中的走神。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):1059-1073. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00707-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relative Accuracy of Different Methods for Measuring Mind Wandering Subtypes: A Systematic Review.测量思维游荡亚型的不同方法的相对准确性:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70764.
2
Extending homeostasis to thought dynamics for a comprehensive explanation of mind-wandering.将内稳态扩展至思维动态,以全面解释走神现象。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;15(1):8677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92561-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of social isolation and changes in work patterns on ongoing thought during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom.在英国第一次 COVID-19 封锁期间,社会隔离和工作模式变化对持续思考的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 5;118(40). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102565118.
2
Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.检验探测性思维漫游报告的竞争测量方法的构念效度。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2372-2411. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01557-x. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
3
Experience sampling of the degree of mind wandering distinguishes hidden attentional states.
体验抽样法可区分出注意的隐性状态。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104380. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104380. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
4
Quantifying streams of thought during cognitive task performance using sequence analysis.使用序列分析量化认知任务执行过程中的思维流。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2417-2437. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01416-1.
5
A multi-faceted approach to understanding individual differences in mind-wandering.一种理解走神个体差异的多方面方法。
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104078. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104078. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
6
Influence of content and intensity of thought on behavioral and pupil changes during active mind-wandering, off-focus, and on-task states.主动走神、注意力分散和专注任务状态下思维内容和强度对行为及瞳孔变化的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):1125-1135. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01865-7.
7
Modeling distracted performance.建模注意力分散的表现。
Cogn Psychol. 2019 Aug;112:48-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
Examining the effects of probe frequency, response options, and framing within the thought-probe method.探讨思维探测法中探测频率、反应选项和框架的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):398-408. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01212-6.
9
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
10
How pervasive is mind wandering, really?思维漫游到底有多普遍?
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Nov;66:74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 6.