Lyu Tu, Guo Yulin, Geng Qixiang
School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1101543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1101543. eCollection 2022.
It is essential to avoid opportunistic behaviors of food supply chain members to guarantee food safety and sustainable supply. This research adopted the perspective of supply chain membership governance to discuss the critical mechanisms of opportunistic behavior avoidance and performance improvement in the food supply chain. Two information-sharing mechanisms (information sharing with customers and information sharing with suppliers) were used as mediating variables to explore the mechanisms of how social control, information sharing, and opportunistic behavior worked on supply chain performance. Furthermore, an online questionnaire survey was conducted to collect 210 data samples from the food manufacturing industry in China, and the structural equation model method was applied to test the research hypotheses. According to the empirical research findings, social control can directly reduce opportunistic behaviors of supply chain members and reduce such behaviors indirectly the mediating factor of information sharing; social control affects the supply chain performance the mediating factors of information sharing and opportunistic behavior, instead of directly improving supply chain performance. Two information sharing mechanisms vary in their mechanism of influence. Information sharing with customers reduces opportunistic behaviors, but does not directly improve supply chain performance. Information sharing with suppliers enhances supply chain performance and reduces opportunistic behaviors. This research offers theoretical and practical suggestions for performance improvement and opportunistic behavior avoidance to promote food supply chain management.
为保证食品安全和可持续供应,避免食品供应链成员的机会主义行为至关重要。本研究从供应链成员治理的角度探讨了食品供应链中避免机会主义行为和提高绩效的关键机制。采用两种信息共享机制(与客户信息共享和与供应商信息共享)作为中介变量,探究社会控制、信息共享和机会主义行为对供应链绩效的作用机制。此外,通过在线问卷调查从中国食品制造业收集了210个数据样本,并运用结构方程模型方法对研究假设进行检验。实证研究结果表明,社会控制可以直接减少供应链成员的机会主义行为,并通过信息共享这一中介因素间接减少此类行为;社会控制通过信息共享和机会主义行为这些中介因素影响供应链绩效,而非直接提高供应链绩效。两种信息共享机制的影响机制有所不同。与客户信息共享可减少机会主义行为,但不能直接提高供应链绩效。与供应商信息共享可提高供应链绩效并减少机会主义行为。本研究为促进食品供应链管理的绩效提升和避免机会主义行为提供了理论和实践建议。