Bakhireva Ludmila N, Nebeker Camille, Ossorio Pilar, Angal Jyoti, Thomason Moriah E, Croff Julie M
College of Pharmacy Substance Use Research and Education (SURE) Center, University of New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC 09 5360, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Advers Resil Sci. 2020 Dec;1(4):285-294. doi: 10.1007/s42844-020-00020-8. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
This manuscript is the result of an interdisciplinary team approach to examine the ethical and cultural considerations of biospecimen collection among American Indian and Alaskan Native (AIAN) communities for the planned Healthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) study. We begin by reviewing a brief history of the treatment of AIAN communities by the US government and within research studies. Based in part on this history, we highlight the overlapping and intersecting vulnerabilities of AIAN communities, including historical trauma, poverty, lack of healthcare access, and environmental hazards. After consideration of ethical and legal implications, we introduce our recommendations for biospecimen collection/biobanking with AIAN communities in the context of population-representative, multi-site, national studies. We recommend the following key considerations: (1) authentic partnership development; (2) beneficence to the community; (3) culturally respectful research design; (4) meaningful consent to support enrollment and retention; (5) culturally appropriate data management. Adherence to a culturally aware approach for inclusion of underrepresented communities assures external validity in the national studies and increases likelihood of bidirectional value exchange.
本手稿是一个跨学科团队合作的成果,旨在探讨在美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)社区中为计划开展的“健康大脑与儿童发育”(HBCD)研究进行生物样本采集时的伦理和文化考量。我们首先回顾美国政府以及研究中对AIAN社区的治疗简史。部分基于这段历史,我们强调了AIAN社区重叠且相互交织的脆弱性,包括历史创伤、贫困、缺乏医疗保健机会以及环境危害。在考虑伦理和法律影响之后,我们针对在具有人口代表性的多地点全国性研究背景下与AIAN社区进行生物样本采集/生物样本库建设提出建议。我们建议考虑以下关键因素:(1)建立真正的伙伴关系;(2)对社区有益;(3)设计尊重文化的研究;(4)获得有意义的同意以支持招募和留存;(5)进行符合文化习惯的数据管理。坚持采用具有文化意识的方法纳入代表性不足的社区,可确保全国性研究的外部有效性,并增加双向价值交换的可能性。