• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠和人类多感官刺激的时间顺序判断

Temporal order judgment of multisensory stimuli in rat and human.

作者信息

Mafi Fatemeh, Tang Matthew F, Afarinesh Mohammad Reza, Ghasemian Sadegh, Sheibani Vahid, Arabzadeh Ehsan

机构信息

Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Cognitive Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jan 12;16:1070452. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1070452. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1070452
PMID:36710957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9879721/
Abstract

We do not fully understand the resolution at which temporal information is processed by different species. Here we employed a temporal order judgment (TOJ) task in rats and humans to test the temporal precision with which these species can detect the order of presentation of simple stimuli across two modalities of vision and audition. Both species reported the order of audiovisual stimuli when they were presented from a central location at a range of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA)s. While both species could reliably distinguish the temporal order of stimuli based on their sensory content (i.e., the modality label), rats outperformed humans at short SOAs (less than 100 ms) whereas humans outperformed rats at long SOAs (greater than 100 ms). Moreover, rats produced faster responses compared to humans. The reaction time data further revealed key differences in decision process across the two species: at longer SOAs, reaction times increased in rats but decreased in humans. Finally, drift-diffusion modeling allowed us to isolate the contribution of various parameters including evidence accumulation rates, lapse and bias to the sensory decision. Consistent with the psychophysical findings, the model revealed higher temporal sensitivity and a higher lapse rate in rats compared to humans. These findings suggest that these species applied different strategies for making perceptual decisions in the context of a multimodal TOJ task.

摘要

我们尚未完全理解不同物种处理时间信息的分辨率。在此,我们在大鼠和人类中采用了时间顺序判断(TOJ)任务,以测试这些物种在跨视觉和听觉两种模态检测简单刺激呈现顺序时的时间精度。当视听刺激从中央位置以一系列刺激起始异步(SOA)呈现时,两个物种都报告了刺激的顺序。虽然两个物种都可以根据其感官内容(即模态标签)可靠地区分刺激的时间顺序,但在短SOA(小于100毫秒)时大鼠的表现优于人类,而在长SOA(大于100毫秒)时人类的表现优于大鼠。此外,与人类相比,大鼠产生的反应更快。反应时间数据进一步揭示了两个物种在决策过程中的关键差异:在较长的SOA时,大鼠的反应时间增加,而人类的反应时间减少。最后,漂移扩散模型使我们能够分离出包括证据积累率、失误率和偏差在内的各种参数对感官决策的贡献。与心理物理学结果一致,该模型显示大鼠比人类具有更高的时间敏感性和更高的失误率。这些发现表明,在多模态TOJ任务的背景下,这些物种采用了不同的策略来做出感知决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977f/9879721/3ea01249518f/fnbeh-16-1070452-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977f/9879721/39235614686c/fnbeh-16-1070452-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977f/9879721/967172c71a38/fnbeh-16-1070452-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977f/9879721/3ea01249518f/fnbeh-16-1070452-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977f/9879721/39235614686c/fnbeh-16-1070452-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977f/9879721/967172c71a38/fnbeh-16-1070452-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977f/9879721/3ea01249518f/fnbeh-16-1070452-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Temporal order judgment of multisensory stimuli in rat and human.大鼠和人类多感官刺激的时间顺序判断
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jan 12;16:1070452. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1070452. eCollection 2022.
2
Audiovisual Temporal Processing and Synchrony Perception in the Rat.大鼠的视听时间处理与同步感知
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jan 10;10:246. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00246. eCollection 2016.
3
Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.跨模态对应是否调节模态特定的感知处理?使用定时判断任务的研究。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):273-284. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02812-3. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
4
Behavioral Plasticity of Audiovisual Perception: Rapid Recalibration of Temporal Sensitivity but Not Perceptual Binding Following Adult-Onset Hearing Loss.视听感知的行为可塑性:成人后天性听力损失后时间敏感性的快速重新校准而非知觉绑定
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;12:256. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00256. eCollection 2018.
5
Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance.影响人类绩效中多感觉整合的空间和时间刺激因素之间的相互作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 May;219(1):121-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3072-1. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
6
Measuring the sensitivity of tactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind participants using the adaptive psi method.使用自适应 psi 方法测量视力正常和失明参与者的触觉时间顺序判断的灵敏度。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Oct;83(7):2995-3007. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02301-5. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Task-irrelevant sounds influence both temporal order and apparent-motion judgments about tactile stimuli applied to crossed and uncrossed hands.与任务无关的声音会影响对施加于交叉手和非交叉手的触觉刺激的时间顺序判断和表观运动判断。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):773-783. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1476-5.
8
Lateralized temporal order judgement in dyslexia.诵读困难症的侧化时间顺序判断。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Dec;47(14):3244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.007. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
9
The effect of phasic alertness on temporal precision.阶段性警觉对时间精度的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jan;80(1):262-274. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1418-2.
10
Audiovisual integration in depth: multisensory binding and gain as a function of distance.深度上的视听整合:多感官绑定与增益随距离的变化
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jul;236(7):1939-1951. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5274-7. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Error modulates categorization of subsecond durations in multitasking contexts.错误调节多任务情境下亚秒级时长的分类。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1253-1271. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01945-w. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
2
Past and present experience shifts audiovisual temporal perception in rats.过去和现在的经历会改变大鼠的视听时间感知。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Oct 16;17:1287587. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1287587. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal integration is a robust feature of perceptual decisions.时间整合是知觉决策的一个强有力特征。
Elife. 2023 May 4;12:e84045. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84045.
2
Different Forms of Variability Could Explain a Difference Between Human and Rat Decision Making.不同形式的变异性可能解释人类与大鼠决策之间的差异。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 22;16:794681. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.794681. eCollection 2022.
3
Lapses in perceptual decisions reflect exploration.感知决策的失误反映了探索。
Elife. 2021 Jan 11;10:e55490. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55490.
4
Momentary lapses of attention in multisensory environment.多感官环境中的瞬间注意力不集中。
Cortex. 2020 Oct;131:195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
A flexible framework for simulating and fitting generalized drift-diffusion models.用于模拟和拟合广义漂移扩散模型的灵活框架。
Elife. 2020 Aug 4;9:e56938. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56938.
6
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0.报告动物研究:ARRIVE 指南 2.0 的解释和说明。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 14;18(7):e3000411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
The impact of learning on perceptual decisions and its implication for speed-accuracy tradeoffs.学习对知觉决策的影响及其对速度-准确性权衡的意义。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 2;11(1):2757. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16196-7.
8
Causality shifts the perceived temporal order of audiovisual events.因果关系改变了视听事件的感知时间顺序。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Sep;46(9):890-900. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000754. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
The Interaction Between Elapsed Time and Decision Accuracy Differs Between Humans and Rats.人类和大鼠在经过时间与决策准确性之间的相互作用存在差异。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Nov 19;13:1211. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01211. eCollection 2019.
10
Discrimination of temporal regularity in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).大鼠(Rattus norvegicus)和人类(Homo sapiens)时间规律的辨别。
J Comp Psychol. 2020 Feb;134(1):3-10. doi: 10.1037/com0000202. Epub 2019 Oct 7.