Suppr超能文献

初始培训后结肠镜检查质量的改善:一项强化短期培训的横断面研究。

Colonoscopy quality improvement after initial training: A cross-sectional study of intensive short-term training.

作者信息

Schult Anna Lisa, Hoff Geir, Holme Øyvind, Botteri Edoardo, Seip Birgitte, Ranheim Randel Kristin, Darre-Næss Ole, Owen Tanja, Nilsen Jens Aksel, Nguyen Dung Hong, Johansen Kristin, de Lange Thomas

机构信息

Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2023 Jan 26;11(1):E117-E127. doi: 10.1055/a-1994-6084. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

High-quality is crucial for the effectiveness of colonoscopy and can be achieved by high-quality training and verified with assessment of key performance indicators (KPIs) for colonoscopy such as cecum intubation rate (CIR), adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adequate polyp resection. Typically, trainees achieve adequate CIR after 275 procedures, but little is known about learning curves for KPIs after initial training. This cross-sectional study includes work-up colonoscopies after a positive screening test with fecal occult blood testing (FIT) or sigmoidoscopy, performed by either trainees after 300 training colonoscopies or by consultants. Outcome measures were KPIs. We assessed inter-endoscopist variation in trainees and learning curves for trainees as a group. We also compared KPIs for trainees and consultants as a group.  Data from 6,655 colonoscopies performed by 21 trainees and 921 colonoscopies performed by 17 consultants were included. Most trainees achieved target standards for main KPIs. With time, trainees shortened cecum intubation time and withdrawal time without decreasing their ADR, reduced the proportion of painful colonoscopies, and increased the adequate polyp resection rate (all  < 0.01). Compared to consultants, trainees had higher CIR (97.7 % vs. 96.3 %,  = 0.02), ADR after positive FIT (57.6 % vs. 50.3 %,  < 0.01), and proximal ADR after sigmoidoscopy screening (41.1 % vs. 29.8 %;  < 0.01), higher adequate polyp resection rate (94.9 % vs. 93.1 %,  = 0.01) and fewer serious adverse events (0.65 % vs. 1.41 %,  = 0.02). Trainees performed high-quality colonoscopies and achieved international target standards. Several KPIs continuously improved after initial training. Trainees outperformed consultants on several KPIs.

摘要

高质量对于结肠镜检查的有效性至关重要,可通过高质量培训来实现,并通过评估结肠镜检查的关键绩效指标(KPI)进行验证,如盲肠插管率(CIR)、腺瘤检出率(ADR)和息肉充分切除率。通常,受训者在完成275例操作后可实现足够的CIR,但对于初始培训后KPI的学习曲线了解甚少。这项横断面研究包括在粪便潜血试验(FIT)或乙状结肠镜检查筛查呈阳性后进行的检查性结肠镜检查,由完成300例培训结肠镜检查后的受训者或顾问进行。结果指标为KPI。我们评估了受训者之间的内镜医师间差异以及作为一个群体的受训者的学习曲线。我们还比较了作为一个群体的受训者和顾问的KPI。纳入了21名受训者进行的6655例结肠镜检查数据和17名顾问进行的921例结肠镜检查数据。大多数受训者达到了主要KPI的目标标准。随着时间的推移,受训者缩短了盲肠插管时间和退镜时间,同时不降低ADR,减少了结肠镜检查疼痛的比例,并提高了息肉充分切除率(均P<0.01)。与顾问相比,受训者的CIR更高(97.7%对96.3%,P=0.02),FIT阳性后的ADR更高(57.6%对50.3%,P<0.01),乙状结肠镜检查筛查后的近端ADR更高(41.1%对29.8%;P<0.01),息肉充分切除率更高(94.9%对93.1%,P=0.01),严重不良事件更少(0.65%对1.41%,P=0.02)。受训者进行了高质量的结肠镜检查并达到了国际目标标准。初始培训后,几个KPI持续改善。在几个KPI方面,受训者的表现优于顾问。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5d7/9879657/ad5b5ef5f4f9/10-1055-a-1994-6084-i2789ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验