Barth Amy E, Thomas Cathy Newman, Kincaid Heather, Ankrum Ethan, Ruiz Brandon, Salazar Leslie
Department of Literacy, Buena Vista University.
Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Texas State University.
Int J Res Learn Disabil. 2022;5(2):18-35.
The primary aims of this mixed method study were to (a) examine the effectiveness of a brief inference intervention, (b) compare the types of knowledge-based inferencing errors less skilled middle grade readers make, and (c) evaluate if self-reported cognitive load relates to inferencing. Participants ( = 17) were randomly assigned to a graphic organizer-inference intervention (GO-Inference) ( = 9) or business as usual (BAU) condition ( = 8), and differences between groups were explored for each study purpose. Quantitative and qualitative results suggested that while less skilled readers in the GO-Inference condition made modest progress in forming knowledge-based inferences, they continued to struggle to distinguish relevant versus irrelevant information from text and/or retrieve knowledge necessary to form inferences. Students in the BAU condition were more likely to make errors such as providing irrelevant information or failing to respond. Additionally, students in the GO-Inference condition reported lower cognitive load during inference-making tasks.
(a)检验一种简短推理干预的有效性;(b)比较不太熟练的中年级读者所犯的基于知识的推理错误类型;(c)评估自我报告的认知负荷是否与推理相关。参与者(n = 17)被随机分配到图形组织者 - 推理干预组(GO - 推理组)(n = 9)或照常处理组(BAU组)(n = 8),并针对每个研究目的探讨了两组之间的差异。定量和定性结果表明,虽然处于GO - 推理条件下不太熟练的读者在形成基于知识的推理方面取得了一定进展,但他们在从文本中区分相关与不相关信息和/或检索形成推理所需的知识方面仍存在困难。BAU组的学生更有可能犯诸如提供不相关信息或不做回应等错误。此外,处于GO - 推理条件下的学生在推理任务中报告的认知负荷较低。