National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani", Via Portuense, 292-00149, Rome, Italy.
National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani", Via Portuense, 292-00149, Rome, Italy.
Anaerobe. 2021 Aug;70:102380. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102380. Epub 2021 May 7.
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) represents a challenging issue, with an evolving epidemiology. Main objectives of our study were: to assess the frequency of diarrhea of overall etiology, including CDI, as a cause of hospital admission or occurring during hospital stay;- to determine the rate of underdiagnosis of community-acquired (CA-), health care associated (HCA)- and hospital onset (HO-) CDI, and explore factors associated with its clinical suspicion by physicians.
A prospective cohort study included all hospitalized patients with diarrhea at two acute-care hospitals. C. difficile (CD) tests were performed on every stool samples, irrespective of the treating physician request. Factors associated with the likelihood of CD test request by physicians were assessed.
We enrolled 871 (6%) patients with diarrhea. CD test performed on all diarrheic stool samples was positive in 228 cases (26%); 37, 106, 85 cases of CA- (14%), HCA- (42%) and HO- diarrhea (24%), respectively. Treating physicians did not request CD test in 207 (24%) diarrhea cases. The rate of CDI underdiagnosis was 11% (24/228); it was higher in CA-CDI (27%, 10/37). Logistic regression analysis identified age >65 years (RR 1.1; 95 CI 1.06-1.2) and hospitalizations in the previous 3 months (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3) as independent factors associated with the likelihood of requesting the CD test by the physician. These risk factors differed by epidemiological classification of diarrhea and by hospital.
Our study confirmed the relevance of CDI underdiagnosis and provided new insights in the factors underlying the lack of CDI clinical suspicion.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是一个具有挑战性的问题,其流行病学在不断发展。本研究的主要目的是:评估包括 CDI 在内的各种病因引起的腹泻作为住院或住院期间发生的病因的频率;- 确定社区获得性(CA-)、医疗保健相关性(HCA-)和医院获得性(HO-)CDI 的漏诊率,并探讨与医生对其临床怀疑相关的因素。
一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了两家急性护理医院所有腹泻住院患者。对每个粪便样本均进行艰难梭菌(CD)检测,无论主治医生是否要求。评估了医生要求进行 CD 检测的可能性相关因素。
我们共纳入 871 例(6%)腹泻患者。对所有腹泻粪便样本进行 CD 检测,阳性 228 例(26%);37、106、85 例分别为 CA-(14%)、HCA-(42%)和 HO-腹泻(24%)。207 例(24%)腹泻患者的主治医生未要求进行 CD 检测。CDI 漏诊率为 11%(24/228);CA-CDI 漏诊率更高(27%,10/37)。Logistic 回归分析发现年龄>65 岁(RR 1.1;95%CI 1.06-1.2)和过去 3 个月内住院(RR 1.2;95%CI 1.1-1.3)是与医生要求进行 CD 检测的可能性相关的独立因素。这些危险因素因腹泻的流行病学分类和医院而异。
本研究证实了 CDI 漏诊的相关性,并为缺乏 CDI 临床怀疑的原因提供了新的见解。