Kim Min-Gul, Im Yong-Jin, Lee Jong-Hwan, Kim Eun-Young, Yeom Sang Woo, Kim Jong Seung
Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 11;9:1076356. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1076356. eCollection 2022.
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are acid suppressants that are frequently prescribed in many countries to reduce heartburn. A potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB; tegoprazan) was launched relatively recently that also inhibits gastric acid secretion. This study aimed to compare the hepatotoxicity of the six existing PPIs with P-CAB.
This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2019 and December 2020 and included data from the total population of 50 million inhabitants in Korea. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed using 10 variables, and the differences in hepatotoxicity between P-CAB and the six PPIs were compared in a similar distribution. The primary endpoint was hepatotoxicity which included toxic liver disease, hepatitis, hepatic failure, liver transplantation, and other liver diseases.
The risk ratios (RR) of tegoprazan vs. the six PPIs (dexlansoprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) were all significant [RR: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.69-0.72), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.83), 0.61 (95% CI: 0.59-0.63), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.13-1.20), 0.61 (95% CI: 0.59-0.62), and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.75), respectively]. The risk ratio of tegoprazan vs. the six existing PPIs was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.72-0.75). The hazard ratios (HRs) of hepatotoxicity of the six PPIs to tegoprazan showed significantly higher values apart from omeprazole (HR: dexlansoprazole, 1.13; esomeprazole, 1.04; lansoprazole, 1.25; omeprazole, 0.77; pantoprazole, 1.26; rabeprazole, 1.15, respectively, and the six existing PPIs, 1.10).
Using a large-scale data cohort analysis consisting of 50 million Koreans, tegoprazan did not induce higher hepatotoxicity compared with the six conventional PPIs.
质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是一种抑酸剂,在许多国家经常被用于减轻烧心症状。一种钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB;替戈拉赞)是最近才上市的,它也能抑制胃酸分泌。本研究旨在比较六种现有的质子泵抑制剂与P-CAB的肝毒性。
这项回顾性队列研究在2019年1月至2020年12月期间进行,纳入了韩国5000万居民的总人口数据。使用10个变量进行倾向评分(PS)匹配,并在相似分布中比较P-CAB与六种质子泵抑制剂之间的肝毒性差异。主要终点是肝毒性,包括中毒性肝病、肝炎、肝衰竭、肝移植和其他肝病。
替戈拉赞与六种质子泵抑制剂(右兰索拉唑、埃索美拉唑、兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑、泮托拉唑和雷贝拉唑)的风险比(RR)均具有显著性[RR分别为:0.70(95%CI:0.69-0.72)、0.81(95%CI:0.79-0.83)、0.61(95%CI:0.59-0.63)、1.17(95%CI:1.13-1.20)、0.61(95%CI:0.59-0.62)和0.73(95%CI:0.71-0.75)]。替戈拉赞与六种现有质子泵抑制剂的风险比为0.73(95%CI:0.72-0.75)。除奥美拉唑外,六种质子泵抑制剂对替戈拉赞的肝毒性风险比(HR)显示出显著更高的值(HR分别为:右兰索拉唑1.13;埃索美拉唑1.04;兰索拉唑1.25;奥美拉唑0.77;泮托拉唑1.26;雷贝拉唑1.15,六种现有质子泵抑制剂为1.10)。
通过对5000万韩国人的大规模数据队列分析,与六种传统质子泵抑制剂相比,替戈拉赞不会引起更高的肝毒性。