• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Policy learning and change during crisis: COVID-19 policy responses across six states.危机期间的政策学习与变革:六个州对新冠疫情的政策应对措施
Rev Policy Res. 2023 Jan;40(1):10-35. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12511. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
2
Protective Policy Index (PPI) global dataset of origins and stringency of COVID 19 mitigation policies.全球 COVID-19 缓解政策起源和严格程度的保护政策指数(PPI)数据集。
Sci Data. 2022 Jun 16;9(1):319. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01437-9.
3
Strengthening Health Systems To Face Pandemics: Subnational Policy Responses To COVID-19 In Latin America.加强卫生系统以应对大流行病:拉丁美洲对 COVID-19 的国家以下政策应对。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Mar;41(3):454-462. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00981.
4
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
5
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
6
A partisan pandemic: state government public health policies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil.党派主导的大流行:巴西州政府抗击 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005223.
7
Consolidated state political party control and the enactment of obesity-related policies in the United States.美国政党合并与肥胖相关政策的制定。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Drivers of COVID-19 policy stringency in 175 countries and territories: COVID-19 cases and deaths, gross domestic products per capita, and health expenditures.175 个国家和地区 COVID-19 政策严格程度的驱动因素:COVID-19 病例和死亡人数、人均国内生产总值和卫生支出。
J Glob Health. 2022 Dec 17;12:05049. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05049.
9
Application of the Policy Regime Framework to understand COVID-19 policy response in the Southeast U.S.: How RAPID research can provide lessons learned after a public health crisis.应用政策制度框架理解美国东南部对新冠疫情的政策应对:快速研究如何能在公共卫生危机后提供经验教训。
Front Sociol. 2022 Dec 12;7:959553. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.959553. eCollection 2022.
10
From multiple streams to a torrent: A case study of food policymaking and innovations in New York during the COVID-19 emergency.从多股溪流到洪流:新冠疫情紧急状态下纽约食品政策制定与创新的案例研究
Cities. 2023 May;136:104222. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104222. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
How can health systems sustain lessons drawn from emergency contexts? Evidence from Colombia.卫生系统如何才能延续从紧急情况中吸取的经验教训?来自哥伦比亚的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 31;20(7):e0322486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322486. eCollection 2025.
2
Preparing for the next pandemic: Reflections and recommendations from Florida.为下一次大流行做准备:来自佛罗里达的思考与建议。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0314570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314570. eCollection 2024.
3
Revealing the boon and bane of South Africa's disaster management legislation during COVID-19.揭示新冠疫情期间南非灾害管理立法的利弊
Jamba. 2024 Oct 31;16(1):1689. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1689. eCollection 2024.
4
The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing hospitalisation and mortality: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Iran.COVID-19 疫苗接种在预防住院和死亡方面的有效性:伊朗全国性的横断面研究。
J Glob Health. 2024 Sep 27;14:05026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.05026.
5
Impact of Easing COVID-19 Restrictions on Fear of COVID-19 and Social Support Among Chinese Students: A Longitudinal Analysis.放宽新冠疫情限制措施对中国学生新冠恐惧及社会支持的影响:一项纵向分析
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Nov 20;16:4685-4696. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S434765. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The health-economy trade-off during the Covid-19 pandemic: Communication matters.在新冠疫情期间的健康与经济权衡:沟通至关重要。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 13;16(9):e0256103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256103. eCollection 2021.
2
Phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Boston highlights the impact of superspreading events.波士顿地区 SARS-CoV-2 的系统进化分析强调了超级传播事件的影响。
Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529). doi: 10.1126/science.abe3261. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
Political partisanship influences behavioral responses to governors' recommendations for COVID-19 prevention in the United States.政治党派偏见影响美国民众对州长新冠防疫建议的行为反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24144-24153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007835117. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
States Divided: The Implications of American Federalism for COVID-19.各州分化:美国联邦制对新冠疫情的影响
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Jul-Aug;80(4):595-602. doi: 10.1111/puar.13243. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Governing Under Pressure: German Policy Making During the Coronavirus Crisis.压力下的治理:新冠疫情危机期间的德国政策制定
Polit Q. 2020 Jul-Sep;91(3):542-552. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12865. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Western Washington State COVID-19 Experience: Keys to Flattening the Curve and Effective Health System Response.华盛顿州西部的 COVID-19 疫情经验:控制曲线和有效卫生系统响应的关键。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Sep;231(3):316-324.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

危机期间的政策学习与变革:六个州对新冠疫情的政策应对措施

Policy learning and change during crisis: COVID-19 policy responses across six states.

作者信息

Crow Deserai A, DeLeo Rob A, Albright Elizabeth A, Taylor Kristin, Birkland Tom, Zhang Manli, Koebele Elizabeth, Jeschke Nathan, Shanahan Elizabeth A, Cage Caleb

机构信息

School of Public Affairs University of Colorado Denver Denver Colorado USA.

Department of Political Science Bentley University Waltham Massachusetts USA.

出版信息

Rev Policy Res. 2023 Jan;40(1):10-35. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12511. Epub 2022 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1111/ropr.12511
PMID:36714158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9874426/
Abstract

Whereas policy change is often characterized as a gradual and incremental process, effective crisis response necessitates that organizations adapt to evolving problems in near real time. Nowhere is this dynamic more evident than in the case of COVID-19, which forced subnational governments to constantly adjust and recalibrate public health and disease mitigation measures in the face of changing patterns of viral transmission and the emergence of new information. This study assesses (a) the extent to which subnational policies changed over the course of the pandemic; (b) whether these changes are emblematic of policy learning; and (c) the drivers of these changes, namely changing political and public health conditions. Using a novel dataset analyzing each policy's content, including its timing of enactment, substantive focus, stringency, and similar variables, results indicate the pandemic response varied significantly across states. The states examined were responsive to both changing public health and political conditions. This study identifies patterns of , which denotes learning in anticipation of an emerging hazard. In doing so, the study provides important insights into the dynamics of policy learning and change during disaster.

摘要

虽然政策变化通常被描述为一个渐进的过程,但有效的危机应对要求组织几乎实时地适应不断演变的问题。这种动态在新冠疫情期间最为明显,疫情迫使地方政府面对病毒传播模式的变化和新信息的出现,不断调整和重新校准公共卫生及疾病缓解措施。本研究评估:(a)在疫情期间地方政策的变化程度;(b)这些变化是否是政策学习的体现;(c)这些变化的驱动因素,即不断变化的政治和公共卫生状况。通过使用一个新颖的数据集来分析每项政策的内容,包括其颁布时间、实质重点、严格程度及类似变量,结果表明各州的疫情应对措施差异显著。所考察的各州对不断变化的公共卫生和政治状况都做出了回应。本研究识别出了“预期性学习”模式,即针对新出现的危害进行学习。在此过程中,该研究为灾难期间政策学习和变化的动态提供了重要见解。