Suppr超能文献

美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处中,国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)定义的低危、中危-高危前列腺癌患者盆腔淋巴结清扫率的差异。

Differences in rates of pelvic lymph node dissection in National Comprehensive Cancer Network favorable, unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer across United States SEER registries.

作者信息

Flammia Rocco Simone, Hoeh Benedikt, Chierigo Francesco, Hohenhorst Lukas, Sorce Gabriele, Tian Zhen, Leonardo Costantino, Graefen Markus, Terrone Carlo, Saad Fred, Shariat Shahrokh F, Briganti Alberto, Montorsi Francesco, Chun Felix K H, Gallucci Michele, Karakiewicz Pierre I

机构信息

Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Urol. 2022 Dec;16(4):191-196. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000132. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in NCCN high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. We tested for PLND nonadherence (no-PLND) rates within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (2010-2015).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all radical prostatectomy patients who fulfilled the NCCN PLND guideline criteria (n = 23,495). Nonadherence rates to PLND were tabulated and further stratified according to NCCN risk subgroups, race/ethnicity, geographic distribution, and year of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Overall, the no-PLND rate was 26%; it was 41%, 25%, and 11% in the NCCN intermediate favorable, intermediate unfavorable, and high-risk prostate cancer patients, respectively ( < 0.001). Over time, the no-PLND rates declined in the overall cohort and within each NCCN risk subgroup. Georgia exhibited the highest no-PLND rate (49%), whereas New Jersey exhibited the lowest (15%). Finally, no-PLND race/ethnicity differences were recorded only in the NCCN intermediate unfavorable subgroup, where Asians exhibited the lowest no-PLND rate (20%) versus African Americans (27%) versus Whites (26%) versus Hispanic-Latinos (25%).

CONCLUSIONS

The lowest no-PLND rates were recorded in the NCCN high-risk patients followed by NCCN intermediate unfavorable and favorable risk in that order. Our findings suggest that unexpectedly elevated differences in no-PLND rates warrant further examination. In all the NCCN risk subgroups, the no-PLND rates decreased over time.

摘要

背景

美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南推荐对NCCN高危和中危前列腺癌患者进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)。我们在监测、流行病学和最终结果(2010 - 2015年)中检测了PLND未依从率(未行PLND)。

材料与方法

我们确定了所有符合NCCN PLND指南标准的根治性前列腺切除术患者(n = 23495)。将PLND的未依从率制成表格,并根据NCCN风险亚组、种族/族裔、地理分布和诊断年份进一步分层。

结果

总体而言,未行PLND率为26%;在NCCN中危有利、中危不利和高危前列腺癌患者中,该率分别为41%、25%和11%(<0.001)。随着时间的推移,整个队列以及每个NCCN风险亚组中的未行PLND率均下降。佐治亚州的未行PLND率最高(49%),而新泽西州最低(15%)。最后,仅在NCCN中危不利亚组中记录到未行PLND的种族/族裔差异,其中亚洲人的未行PLND率最低(20%),非裔美国人(27%)、白人(26%)和西班牙裔/拉丁裔(25%)。

结论

NCCN高危患者的未行PLND率最低,其次依次为NCCN中危不利和中危有利风险患者。我们的研究结果表明,未行PLND率出人意料地升高的差异值得进一步研究。在所有NCCN风险亚组中,未行PLND率随时间下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66cb/9875209/290975f6a761/curr-urol-16-191-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验