• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“剪推”法作为内镜下取出 PEG 型胃造瘘管的替代方法。

'Cut and push' as an alternative to endoscopic retrieval of PEG type gastrostomy tubes.

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Surgery and Urology, Southampton Children's Hospital, 18 Woodham Park Road, Woodham, Addlestone, Surrey, Southampton, KT153ST, UK.

University Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Jan 30;39(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05382-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00383-023-05382-5
PMID:36715765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9885393/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Percutaneous Endoscopically placed Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are frequently used in children. The traditional endoscopic method to remove/change the PEG device requires general anaesthesia in children. A minimally invasive alternative is the 'Cut and Push' method (C&P): avoiding the risks/wait times of general anaesthesia and reducing resource burden. Data regarding the safety/effectiveness of C&P in children are lacking with concerns raised about the possibility of gastrointestinal obstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cases of PEG removal / change to button in children (< 18 years) between December 2020 and January 2022. Cases were identified from a prospectively maintained database and all cases of C&P included. Parents/carers were asked if the child had suffered any complications following C&P and if flange was visualised in stools.

RESULTS

During the time period, 27 PEGs were either removed or changed to button via C&P. The average waiting time for C&P was 14.29 days, significantly shorter than the minimum 6-month waiting time for elective endoscopy. Our evaluation revealed no complications of C&P at median 70 days (range 25-301). In three cases the flange was visualised in the stool, at 2 days, 3 days and 5 weeks following C&P respectively.

DISCUSSION

These data support the available literature suggesting C&P is an effective means to facilitate minimally invasive and prompt PEG removal/change to button in children. We recommend minimum weight and age parameters for this procedure and further evaluation of the safety and resource implications of this technique.

摘要

目的

经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)管在儿童中经常使用。传统的内镜方法需要对儿童进行全身麻醉来移除/更换 PEG 装置。一种微创替代方法是“切割和推送”方法(C&P):避免全身麻醉的风险/等待时间,并减少资源负担。缺乏关于儿童 C&P 的安全性/有效性的数据,有人担心可能会发生胃肠道梗阻。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 1 月期间所有接受 PEG 移除/更换为纽扣的儿童(<18 岁)病例。病例从一个前瞻性维护的数据库中确定,所有 C&P 病例均包括在内。询问家长/照顾者在 C&P 后儿童是否有任何并发症,以及法兰是否在粪便中可见。

结果

在研究期间,27 例 PEG 经 C&P 被移除或更换为纽扣。C&P 的平均等待时间为 14.29 天,明显短于择期内镜检查的最短 6 个月等待时间。我们的评估发现,在中位 70 天(范围 25-301 天)时,没有 C&P 的并发症。在 3 例中,在 C&P 后分别于第 2、3 和 5 周在粪便中观察到法兰。

讨论

这些数据支持现有文献,表明 C&P 是一种有效的方法,可以促进儿童微创和及时的 PEG 移除/更换为纽扣。我们建议为该手术规定最小的体重和年龄参数,并进一步评估该技术的安全性和资源影响。

相似文献

1
'Cut and push' as an alternative to endoscopic retrieval of PEG type gastrostomy tubes.“剪推”法作为内镜下取出 PEG 型胃造瘘管的替代方法。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Jan 30;39(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05382-5.
2
The 'cut and push' technique: is it really safe?“切割推送”技术:它真的安全吗?
BMJ Case Rep. 2012 Jul 27;2012:bcr2012006607. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-006607.
3
The 'cut and push' method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal.经皮内镜下胃造口管移除的“切割并推送”方法。
Clin Nutr. 2000 Apr;19(2):133-5. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0100.
4
Replacing gastrostomy tubes with collapsible bumpers in pediatric patients: Is it safe to "cut" the tube and allow the bumper to pass enterally?在儿科患者中用可折叠缓冲器更换胃造口管:“剪断”管子并让缓冲器经肠道通过是否安全?
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 May;53(5):942-945. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices in children.经皮内镜胃造口术置管后牵引取出术在儿童中的应用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Oct;55(10):2874-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1090-z. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
6
The "cut and push" method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal in adult patients: the Ipswich experience.成人患者经皮内镜下胃造口管拔除的“切割与推送”方法:伊普斯威奇经验
Nutr Clin Pract. 2009 Apr-May;24(2):281-3. doi: 10.1177/0884533608323420.
7
The "cut and push" method of removing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is not safe in paediatric patients.经皮内镜胃造瘘管的“切割和推送”取出方法在儿科患者中不安全。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Nov 22;40(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05575-y.
8
Feasibility of the cut-and-push method for removing large-caliber soft percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices.经皮内镜胃造瘘大口径软套管推切取出方法的可行性。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;28(4):490-2. doi: 10.1177/0884533613486933. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
9
An evaluation of the "cut and push" method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) removal.经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)“切割并推送”移除方法的评估。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 Jan-Feb;32(1):78-80. doi: 10.1177/014860710803200178.
10
One-Step Insertion of Low-Profile Gastrostomy in Pediatric Patients vs Pull Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes.小儿患者低轮廓胃造口术一步插入与经皮内镜下胃造口术牵拉法的比较:结局的回顾性分析
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Mar;40(3):423-30. doi: 10.1177/0148607114567202. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The "cut and push" method of removing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is not safe in paediatric patients.经皮内镜胃造瘘管的“切割和推送”取出方法在儿科患者中不安全。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Nov 22;40(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05575-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: An Update to the ESPGHAN Position Paper.儿童经皮内镜胃造口术:ESPEN 立场文件更新。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021 Sep 1;73(3):415-426. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003207.
2
Gastrointestinal endoscopy in children and adults: How do they differ?儿童和成人的胃肠内镜:有何不同?
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Jun;53(6):697-705. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
3
Outcomes after paediatric anaesthesia: which ones should have the priority?儿科麻醉后的结果:哪些结果应优先考虑?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jun;32(3):392-397. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000720.
4
The STROBE guidelines.STROBE指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S31-S34. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.
5
Removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in adults using the "cut and push" method: A systematic review.采用“切割推送”法拔除成人经皮内镜下胃造口管:一项系统评价
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2017 Oct;21:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
6
Replacing gastrostomy tubes with collapsible bumpers in pediatric patients: Is it safe to "cut" the tube and allow the bumper to pass enterally?在儿科患者中用可折叠缓冲器更换胃造口管:“剪断”管子并让缓冲器经肠道通过是否安全?
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 May;53(5):942-945. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
7
Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.胃肠管饲:技术、问题与解决方法
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8505-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8505.
8
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement: A simple procedure?经皮内镜下胃造口管置换术:是一个简单的操作吗?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jan 16;5(1):14-8. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i1.14.
9
The 'cut and push' technique: is it really safe?“切割推送”技术:它真的安全吗?
BMJ Case Rep. 2012 Jul 27;2012:bcr2012006607. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-006607.
10
Complications of the cut-and-push technique for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal.经皮内镜胃造瘘管拔出的切割推送技术的并发症。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2011 Jun;26(3):230-1. doi: 10.1177/0884533611405533. Epub 2011 Apr 28.