• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2017-2019 年纽约州接受医用大麻治疗慢性疼痛患者的阿片类药物处方剂量变化。

Changes in Prescribed Opioid Dosages Among Patients Receiving Medical Cannabis for Chronic Pain, New York State, 2017-2019.

机构信息

New York State Department of Health, Albany.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2254573. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54573.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54573
PMID:36716026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9887491/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients with chronic pain often receive long-term opioid therapy (LOT), which places them at risk of opioid use disorder and overdose. This presents the need for alternative or companion treatments; however, few studies on the association of medical cannabis (MC) with reducing opioid dosages exist.

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in opioid dosages among patients receiving MC for longer duration compared with shorter duration.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study of New York State Prescription Monitoring Program data from 2017 to 2019 included patients receiving MC for chronic pain while also receiving opioid treatment. Of these, patients receiving LOT prior to receiving MC were selected. Individuals were studied for 8 months after starting MC. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to February 2022.

EXPOSURES

Selected patients were divided into 2 groups based on the duration of receiving MC: the nonexposure group received MC for 30 days or fewer, and the exposure group received MC for more than 30 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was opioid dosage, measured by mean daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME). Analyses were conducted for 3 strata by opioid dosage prior to receiving MC: MME less than 50, MME of 50 to less than 90, and MME of 90 or greater.

RESULTS

A total of 8165 patients were included, with 4041 (median [IQR] age, 57 [47-65] years; 2376 [58.8%] female) in the exposure group and 4124 (median [IQR] age, 54 (44-62) years; 2370 [57.5%] female) in the nonexposure group. Median (IQR) baseline MMEs for the exposure vs nonexposure groups were 30.0 (20.0-40.0) vs 30.0 (20.0-40.0) in the lowest stratum, 60.0 (60.0-70.0) vs 60.0 (60.0-90.0) in the middle stratum, and 150.0 (100.0-216.2) vs 135.0 (100.0-218.0) in the highest stratum. During follow-up, significantly greater reductions in opioid dosage were observed among the exposure group. A dose-response association of patients' opioid dosage at baseline was observed with the differences in the monthly MME reductions between exposure and nonexposure groups, with a difference of -1.52 (95% CI, -1.67 to -1.37) MME for the lowest stratum, -3.24 (95% CI, -3.61 to -2.87) MME for the middle stratum, and -9.33 (95% CI, -9.89 to -8.77) MME for the highest stratum. The daily MME for the last month of the follow-up period among patients receiving longer MC was reduced by 48% in the lowest stratum, 47% in the middle stratum, and 51% in the highest stratum compared with the baseline dosages. Among individuals in the nonexposure group, daily MME was reduced by only 4% in the lowest stratum, 9% in the middle stratum, and 14% in the highest stratum.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of patients receiving LOT, receiving MC for a longer duration was associated with reductions in opioid dosages, which may lower their risk of opioid-related morbidity and mortality.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e58/9887491/464d53e2a181/jamanetwopen-e2254573-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e58/9887491/44242ee6b5f9/jamanetwopen-e2254573-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e58/9887491/bd404bebed36/jamanetwopen-e2254573-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e58/9887491/464d53e2a181/jamanetwopen-e2254573-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e58/9887491/44242ee6b5f9/jamanetwopen-e2254573-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e58/9887491/bd404bebed36/jamanetwopen-e2254573-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e58/9887491/464d53e2a181/jamanetwopen-e2254573-g003.jpg
摘要

重要性:慢性疼痛患者常接受长期阿片类药物治疗(LOT),这使他们面临阿片类药物使用障碍和过量的风险。这就需要替代或辅助治疗;然而,关于医用大麻(MC)与减少阿片类药物剂量之间关联的研究很少。

目的:评估与较短时间相比,接受 MC 治疗时间较长的患者的阿片类药物剂量变化。

设计、地点和参与者:这项纽约州处方监测计划 2017 年至 2019 年的队列研究纳入了同时接受慢性疼痛 MC 治疗和阿片类药物治疗的患者。其中,选择了 LOT 治疗前接受 MC 治疗的患者。从开始使用 MC 后 8 个月对个人进行了研究。数据于 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 2 月进行了分析。

暴露:根据接受 MC 的时间长短,将选定的患者分为两组:非暴露组接受 MC 治疗 30 天或更短时间,暴露组接受 MC 治疗超过 30 天。

主要结果和测量:主要结果是通过平均每日吗啡毫克当量(MME)来衡量的阿片类药物剂量。对接受 MC 前的阿片类药物剂量进行了 3 个分层分析:MME 小于 50、MME 为 50 至小于 90 和 MME 为 90 或更高。

结果:共纳入 8165 名患者,其中暴露组 4041 名(中位数[IQR]年龄 57[47-65]岁;2376[58.8%]女性),非暴露组 4124 名(中位数[IQR]年龄 54[44-62]岁;2370[57.5%]女性)。暴露组与非暴露组的基线 MME 中位数分别为最低分层的 30.0(20.0-40.0)与 30.0(20.0-40.0),中间分层的 60.0(60.0-70.0)与 60.0(60.0-90.0),最高分层的 150.0(100.0-216.2)与 135.0(100.0-218.0)。在随访期间,暴露组的阿片类药物剂量显著降低。在基线时观察到患者阿片类药物剂量的剂量反应关联,与暴露组和非暴露组之间每月 MME 减少量的差异相关,最低分层的差异为-1.52(95%CI,-1.67 至-1.37)MME,中间分层的差异为-3.24(95%CI,-3.61 至-2.87)MME,最高分层的差异为-9.33(95%CI,-9.89 至-8.77)MME。在随访期的最后一个月,接受较长 MC 治疗的患者的每日 MME 减少量在最低分层中为 48%,在中间分层中为 47%,在最高分层中为 51%,与基线剂量相比。在非暴露组中,每日 MME 仅减少了 4%,在中间分层中减少了 9%,在最高分层中减少了 14%。

结论和相关性:在这项 LOT 患者的队列研究中,接受 MC 治疗时间较长与阿片类药物剂量减少相关,这可能降低他们与阿片类药物相关发病率和死亡率的风险。

相似文献

1
Changes in Prescribed Opioid Dosages Among Patients Receiving Medical Cannabis for Chronic Pain, New York State, 2017-2019.2017-2019 年纽约州接受医用大麻治疗慢性疼痛患者的阿片类药物处方剂量变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2254573. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54573.
2
Association of the 2016 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Opioid Prescribing Guideline With Changes in Opioid Dispensing After Surgery.2016 年美国疾病控制与预防中心阿片类药物处方指南与术后阿片类药物配药变化的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2111826. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11826.
3
Medical Cannabis Used as an Alternative Treatment for Chronic Pain Demonstrates Reduction in Chronic Opioid Use - A Prospective Study.医用大麻作为慢性疼痛的替代疗法,可减少慢性阿片类药物的使用——一项前瞻性研究。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):E113-E119.
4
Trajectories of prescription opioid dose and risk of opioid-related adverse events among older Medicare beneficiaries in the United States: A nested case-control study.美国老年医疗保险受益人群中处方类阿片类药物剂量与阿片类药物相关不良事件风险的轨迹:一项嵌套病例对照研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Mar 15;19(3):e1003947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003947. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Association of Opioids Prescribed to Family Members With Opioid Overdose Among Adolescents and Young Adults.家庭成员开具的阿片类药物与青少年和年轻成年人阿片类药物过量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1018.
6
Changes in Initial Opioid Prescribing Practices After the 2016 Release of the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.《2016 年美国疾病预防控制中心发布慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南后初始阿片类药物处方实践的变化》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116860. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16860.
7
Associations between medical cannabis and prescription opioid use in chronic pain patients: A preliminary cohort study.慢性疼痛患者中医用大麻与处方阿片类药物使用之间的关联:一项初步队列研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0187795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187795. eCollection 2017.
8
Effect of Changing Electronic Health Record Opioid Analgesic Dispense Quantity Defaults on the Quantity Prescribed: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.改变电子健康记录阿片类镇痛药配给数量默认值对处方数量的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7481.
9
Impact of 30-day prescribed opioid dose trajectory on fatal overdose risk: A population-based, statewide cohort study.30 天处方阿片类药物剂量轨迹对致命过量风险的影响:一项基于人群、全州范围的队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(3):393-402. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08419-6. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
10
Trends and Rapidity of Dose Tapering Among Patients Prescribed Long-term Opioid Therapy, 2008-2017.2008-2017 年长期阿片类药物治疗患者的剂量逐渐减少趋势和速度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1916271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16271.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Cannabis Use and Healthcare Utilization Among Patients with Chronic Pain: A Causal Inference Analysis Using TMLE.慢性疼痛患者使用医用大麻与医疗保健利用情况:使用靶向最大似然估计法的因果推断分析
Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;13(4):96. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13040096.
2
Cannabis Legalization and Opioid Use Disorder in Veterans Health Administration Patients.退伍军人健康管理局患者中的大麻合法化与阿片类物质使用障碍
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jun 7;6(6):e251369. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1369.
3
Polysubstance Use Is Not Synonymous With Poly Substance Use Disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis and cannabinoids for chronic pain: a systematic review of non-randomised studies.长期和严重的医用大麻和大麻素对慢性疼痛的危害:非随机研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e054282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054282.
2
Long-term Risk of Overdose or Mental Health Crisis After Opioid Dose Tapering.阿片类药物剂量递减后长期过量或精神健康危机的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216726. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16726.
3
Opioid-sparing effect of cannabinoids for analgesia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies.
多种物质使用并非等同于多种物质使用障碍。
Am J Public Health. 2025 May;115(5):646-648. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308070.
4
The Cost Effectiveness of Adjunctive Medical Cannabis Therapy in the Treatment of Moderate Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.辅助医用大麻疗法治疗中度创伤后应激障碍的成本效益
Clin Drug Investig. 2025 Apr;45(4):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s40261-025-01424-z. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
5
The role of cannabis on total hip and knee surgeries outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.大麻对全髋关节和膝关节手术结局的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2025 Feb;49(2):343-355. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06359-2. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
6
UK medical cannabis registry: A clinical outcome analysis of medical cannabis therapy in chronic pain patients with and without co-morbid sleep impairment.英国医用大麻注册系统:对伴有和不伴有共病睡眠障碍的慢性疼痛患者进行医用大麻治疗的临床结果分析
Pain Pract. 2025 Jan;25(1):e13438. doi: 10.1111/papr.13438. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
7
Measuring the Impact of Medical Cannabis Law Adoption on Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Costs: A Difference-in-Difference Analysis, 2003-2022.衡量医用大麻法律的采用对雇主赞助的健康保险成本的影响:2003 - 2022年的差异分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):119-129. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00913-0. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
8
Cannabis and opioid perceptions, co-use, and substitution among patients across 4 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers.4 家 NCI 癌症中心患者对大麻和阿片类药物的认知、共同使用和替代情况。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Aug 15;2024(66):267-274. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad027.
9
Characteristics of patients with non-cancer pain and long-term prescription opioid use who have used medical versus recreational marijuana.使用医用大麻与消遣性大麻的非癌性疼痛患者及长期处方阿片类药物使用者的特征。
J Cannabis Res. 2024 Feb 22;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s42238-024-00218-y.
10
Perceptions in orthopedic surgery on the use of cannabis in treating pain: a survey of patients with spine pain (POSIT Spine).骨科手术中对大麻治疗疼痛的认知:脊柱疼痛患者的调查(POSIT Spine)。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 30;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04558-6.
大麻素类药物在镇痛方面的阿片类药物节约效应:临床前和临床研究的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jun;47(7):1315-1330. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01322-4. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
Challenges for Clinical Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research in the United States.美国临床大麻和大麻素研究面临的挑战。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2021 Nov 28;2021(58):114-122. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgab009.
5
Prescription Opioid Use Among Adults With Chronic Pain: United States, 2019.2019年美国慢性疼痛成人患者的处方阿片类药物使用情况
Natl Health Stat Report. 2021 Aug(162):1-9.
6
Opioid and non-opioid analgesic prescribing before and after the CDC's 2016 opioid guideline.在 CDC 2016 年阿片类药物指南发布前后的阿片类药物和非阿片类药物镇痛药物的处方情况。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2022 Mar;22(1):1-52. doi: 10.1007/s10754-021-09307-4. Epub 2021 May 8.
7
Opioid use in medical cannabis authorization adult patients from 2013 to 2018: Alberta, Canada.2013 年至 2018 年期间,加拿大艾伯塔省医疗大麻授权的成年患者中阿片类药物的使用情况。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 1;21(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10867-w.
8
Safety Considerations in Cannabinoid-Based Medicine.基于大麻素的药物的安全性考量
Int J Gen Med. 2020 Dec 1;13:1317-1333. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S275049. eCollection 2020.
9
Chronic Pain and High-impact Chronic Pain Among U.S. Adults, 2019.美国成年人慢性疼痛和高影响慢性疼痛,2019 年。
NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Nov(390):1-8.
10
Use of interrupted time series methods in the evaluation of health system quality improvement interventions: a methodological systematic review.运用中断时间序列法评估卫生系统质量改进干预措施:方法学系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003567.