• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神药物国家妊娠登记处:鲁拉西酮和喹硫平的生殖安全性更新。

Reproductive Safety of Lurasidone and Quetiapine: Update from the National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications.

机构信息

Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Apr;32(4):452-462. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0310. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2022.0310
PMID:36716275
Abstract

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), also called atypical antipsychotics, are common therapies for women with a spectrum of psychiatric disorders. No systematically ascertained human reproductive safety data are available for lurasidone, and prospective data for quetiapine are limited, making decisions regarding use of these medications during pregnancy complicated. The National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications is a prospective cohort study designed to collect reproductive safety data relative to SGAs. Pregnant women aged 18-45 years, with psychiatric illness and prenatal psychotropic medication exposure completed three phone interviews during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Cases of presumed malformations are abstracted from medical records for adjudication by a teratologist blinded to medication exposure. Of 2,293 women enrolled at the time of analysis, 134 in the lurasidone group, 264 in the quetiapine group, and 886 controls completed the postpartum interview and were therefore eligible for inclusion. Dropped or lost-to-follow-up participants (13%) and those currently pregnant were excluded. Participants were predominantly White, college-educated, and married (lurasidone = 88.1%, 76.9%, 77.6%; quetiapine = 89.8%, 71.2%, 75.0%; controls = 92.7%, 86.7%, 89.1%). Absolute risks of major malformations were 2.19% (lurasidone), 1.85% (quetiapine), and 1.77% (controls). Odds ratios comparing lurasidone and quetiapine with controls were 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36-4.32) and 1.04 (95% CI = 0.38-2.85), respectively. No specific patterns of malformations were observed in infants exposed to the medications of interest. Lurasidone and quetiapine did not appear to be major teratogens, but further information is needed to refine risk estimates. Food and Drug Administration guidance underscores the importance of pregnancy registries. Clinical trial number: NCT01246765.

摘要

第二代抗精神病药物(SGAs),也称为非典型抗精神病药物,是治疗各种精神疾病女性的常用疗法。目前尚无可供系统确认的卢拉西酮人类生殖安全性数据,喹硫平的前瞻性数据也有限,这使得在怀孕期间使用这些药物的决策变得复杂。国家精神药物妊娠登记处是一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在收集与 SGA 相关的生殖安全性数据。年龄在 18-45 岁之间、患有精神疾病且在怀孕期间使用过精神药物的孕妇在怀孕期间和产后期间完成了三次电话访谈。从病历中提取疑似畸形病例,由一名对药物暴露情况不知情的畸形学家进行裁决。 在分析时,共有 2293 名女性入组,其中卢拉西酮组 134 名,喹硫平组 264 名,对照组 886 名完成了产后访谈,因此有资格入组。脱落或失访者(13%)和目前怀孕者被排除在外。参与者主要为白人、受过大学教育且已婚(卢拉西酮组=88.1%、76.9%、77.6%;喹硫平组=89.8%、71.2%、75.0%;对照组=92.7%、86.7%、89.1%)。主要畸形的绝对风险分别为 2.19%(卢拉西酮)、1.85%(喹硫平)和 1.77%(对照组)。与对照组相比,卢拉西酮和喹硫平的比值比分别为 1.24(95%置信区间[CI] = 0.36-4.32)和 1.04(95%CI = 0.38-2.85)。在暴露于研究药物的婴儿中,没有观察到特定的畸形模式。卢拉西酮和喹硫平似乎不是主要的致畸剂,但需要进一步的信息来完善风险估计。食品和药物管理局的指导强调了妊娠登记处的重要性。临床试验编号:NCT01246765。

相似文献

1
Reproductive Safety of Lurasidone and Quetiapine: Update from the National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications.精神药物国家妊娠登记处:鲁拉西酮和喹硫平的生殖安全性更新。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Apr;32(4):452-462. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0310. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Risk of Major Malformations in Infants Following First-Trimester Exposure to Quetiapine.第一孕期接触喹硫平的婴儿发生重大畸形的风险。
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 1;175(12):1225-1231. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18010098. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
3
Hospitalization risk in pediatric patients with bipolar disorder treated with lurasidone vs. other oral atypical antipsychotics: a real-world retrospective claims database study.在使用鲁拉西酮与其他口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的双相障碍儿科患者中,住院风险的比较:一项真实世界回顾性索赔数据库研究。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):1212-1220. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1993862.
4
Medication Adherence, Health Care Utilization, and Costs in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Initiating Adjunctive Atypical Antipsychotic Treatment.起始辅助使用非典型抗精神病药物治疗的重度抑郁症患者的药物依从性、医疗保健利用和成本。
Clin Ther. 2019 Feb;41(2):221-232. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
5
Reproductive Safety of Second-Generation Antipsychotics: Updated Data From the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics.第二代抗精神病药物的生殖安全性:来自麻省总医院非典型抗精神病药物国家妊娠登记处的最新数据。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 3;82(4):20m13745. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13745.
6
Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Management of Acute Pediatric Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.第二代抗精神病药物治疗儿童双相情感障碍急性发作的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021 Oct;31(8):521-530. doi: 10.1089/cap.2021.0031.
7
Comparison of Lurasidone Versus Quetiapine for the Treatment of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients.比较利鲁唑酮与喹硫平治疗危重症患者谵妄。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):394-399. doi: 10.1177/0885066617754187. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
8
Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis: Efficacy and Safety of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Youths With Bipolar Depression.系统评价和网络荟萃分析:第二代抗精神病药在双相情感障碍青少年中的疗效和安全性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;61(2):243-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 May 4.
9
Hospitalization risk in bipolar disorder patients treated with lurasidone versus other atypical antipsychotics.双相障碍患者在使用鲁拉西酮与其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗时的住院风险。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Feb;35(2):211-219. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1462787. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
10
Reproductive Safety of Second-Generation Antipsychotics: Current Data From the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics.第二代抗精神病药物的生殖安全性:来自马萨诸塞州综合医院非典型抗精神病药物国家妊娠登记处的最新数据。
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 1;173(3):263-70. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15040506. Epub 2015 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Bipolar Disorder in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Clinicians' Guide.孕期及产后双相情感障碍的管理:临床医生指南。
CNS Drugs. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01202-7.
2
Prescribing Patterns for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.孕期双相情感障碍治疗的处方模式:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 28;14(5):1638. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051638.
3
Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Perinatal Mood, Anxiety, and Related Disorders: Guide de pratique 2024 du Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments pour le traitement des troubles de l'humeur, des troubles anxieux et des troubles connexes périnatals.
加拿大情绪与焦虑治疗网络2024年围产期情绪、焦虑及相关障碍管理临床实践指南:加拿大情绪与焦虑治疗网络2024年围产期情绪、焦虑及相关障碍治疗实践指南
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 12:7067437241303031. doi: 10.1177/07067437241303031.
4
Changes in the pharmacokinetics of lurasidone in a pregnant woman with schizophrenia.一名患有精神分裂症的孕妇中鲁拉西酮的药代动力学变化。
PCN Rep. 2024 Dec 9;3(4):e70043. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70043. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Themes in Abortion Forum Discussions in a Restrictive Access Context: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses.限制获取情况下堕胎论坛讨论的主题:定性与定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 9;26:e59544. doi: 10.2196/59544.
6
Comparative Safety of Antipsychotic Medications and Mood Stabilizers During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Congenital Malformations and Prenatal Outcomes.孕期抗精神病药物和心境稳定剂的比较安全性:先天性畸形和产前结局的系统评价与网状荟萃分析
CNS Drugs. 2025 Jan;39(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01131-x. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
7
Is Antipsychotic Drug Use During Pregnancy Associated with Increased Malformation Rates and Worsening of Maternal and Infant Outcomes? A Systematic Review.抗精神病药物在孕期的使用是否会增加畸形发生率和母婴结局恶化?一项系统评价。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(14):2402-2421. doi: 10.2174/1570159X22666240516151449.
8
Striking the Balance: Bipolar Disorder in the Perinatal Period.把握平衡:围产期双相情感障碍
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024 Jan;22(1):3-15. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20230020. Epub 2024 Jan 12.