• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制获取情况下堕胎论坛讨论的主题:定性与定量分析

Themes in Abortion Forum Discussions in a Restrictive Access Context: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses.

作者信息

Klimiuk Krzysztof Bartosz, Kot Amelia, Majcherek Ewa, Kubiak Katarzyna B, Balwicki Łukasz

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 9;26:e59544. doi: 10.2196/59544.

DOI:10.2196/59544
PMID:39652846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11667739/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abortion is one of the most common medical procedures worldwide. Despite this, access to abortion on demand remains restricted in many countries, including Poland. As a result, many women resort to undergoing the procedure without medical supervision, putting themselves at risk of serious health consequences such as drug poisoning, excessive bleeding, and hypovolemia. Unfortunately, some abortions also lead to severe infections.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to qualitatively identify key themes in abortion forums to analyze the issues faced by individuals. The forums were then quantitatively analyzed to determine which problems were most prevalent.

METHODS

The most popular abortion forums were identified. A preliminary thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative phase, followed by a manual quantitative analysis. Two independent researchers reviewed forum posts, categorizing them into specific themes.

RESULTS

An analysis of 13,397 responses from 370 threads across 4 forums revealed "Abortion Process Progression" as the most discussed theme, highlighting a strong demand for information, emotional support, and medical guidance. The highest percentage of threads (162/886, 18.3%) focused on the need for mental support and the desire to have someone in contact during the abortion process. Concerns about the effectiveness of the termination also emerged as a significant topic, accounting for 83 of the 886 (9.4%) discussions. "Emotional and Psychological Aspects" and "Medical and Pharmacological Aspects" were also significant, highlighting the need for holistic care. Anxiety and fear related to the process were frequently discussed, accounting for 60 of the 886 (6.8%) responses. The issue of isolation and lack of support was also a common topic, appearing in 30 of the 886 (3.4%) threads. Notably, "Social and Ethical Perception" accounted for only 13 of the 886 (1.5%) responses and appeared in just 13 threads.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the critical need for information and support for women navigating abortion, particularly in regions where access is restricted. It emphasizes the importance of addressing the multifaceted challenges women face and calls for policy changes and strengthened support networks to improve the health and rights of women, as well as all those seeking gynecological care in abortion contexts. Further research is encouraged to refine and expand support strategies.

摘要

背景

堕胎是全球最常见的医疗程序之一。尽管如此,在包括波兰在内的许多国家,按需堕胎的途径仍然受到限制。因此,许多女性在没有医疗监督的情况下进行堕胎手术,使自己面临药物中毒、大出血和低血容量等严重健康后果的风险。不幸的是,一些堕胎手术还会导致严重感染。

目的

本研究旨在定性识别堕胎论坛中的关键主题,以分析个人所面临的问题。然后对这些论坛进行定量分析,以确定哪些问题最为普遍。

方法

确定了最受欢迎的堕胎论坛。在定性阶段进行了初步的主题分析,随后进行了人工定量分析。两名独立研究人员审查论坛帖子,并将其归类为特定主题。

结果

对来自4个论坛的370个主题帖中的13397条回复进行分析后发现,“堕胎过程进展”是讨论最多的主题,凸显了对信息、情感支持和医疗指导的强烈需求。最高比例的主题帖(162/886,18.3%)关注心理支持的需求以及在堕胎过程中希望有人能联系的愿望。对堕胎有效性的担忧也成为一个重要话题,在886条讨论中占83条(9.4%)。“情感和心理方面”以及“医疗和药理学方面”也很重要,凸显了整体护理的必要性。与堕胎过程相关的焦虑和恐惧经常被讨论,在886条回复中占60条(6.8%)。孤立和缺乏支持的问题也是一个常见话题,出现在886条主题帖中的30条(3.4%)中。值得注意的是,“社会和伦理观念”在886条回复中仅占13条(1.5%),且仅出现在13个主题帖中。

结论

本研究强调了为经历堕胎的女性提供信息和支持的迫切需求,特别是在堕胎途径受限的地区。它强调了应对女性所面临的多方面挑战的重要性,并呼吁政策变革和加强支持网络,以改善女性以及所有在堕胎情况下寻求妇科护理的人的健康和权利。鼓励进一步研究以完善和扩大支持策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a8f/11667739/2676ddd8f5ad/jmir_v26i1e59544_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a8f/11667739/2676ddd8f5ad/jmir_v26i1e59544_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a8f/11667739/2676ddd8f5ad/jmir_v26i1e59544_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Themes in Abortion Forum Discussions in a Restrictive Access Context: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses.限制获取情况下堕胎论坛讨论的主题:定性与定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 9;26:e59544. doi: 10.2196/59544.
2
Most Patients With Bone Sarcomas Seek Emotional Support and Information About Other Patients' Experiences: A Thematic Analysis.大多数骨肉瘤患者寻求情感支持和其他患者经验的信息:主题分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):161-171. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002761. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Abortion access barriers shared in "r/abortion" after : a qualitative analysis of a Reddit community post- decision leak in 2022.2022年Reddit社区决定后泄密事件中“/r/堕胎”板块所分享的堕胎获取障碍:一项定性分析
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024 Dec;32(1):2426921. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2426921. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
Reasons for unsafe abortion in Iran after pronatalist policy changes: a qualitative study.伊朗生育主义政策改变后不安全堕胎的原因:一项定性研究
Reprod Health. 2024 Dec 16;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01929-4.
5
Opportunities for improving abortion care: a key stakeholder analysis of best practices for addressing the needs of transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive people seeking abortions.改善堕胎护理的机会:解决寻求堕胎的跨性别、非二元性别和性别扩展者需求的最佳实践的主要利益相关者分析。
Reprod Health. 2024 Sep 27;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01863-5.
6
Experiences of Women With Medical Abortion Care Reflected in Social Media (VEILLE Study): Noninterventional Retrospective Exploratory Infodemiology Study.社交媒体中反映的药物流产护理女性体验(VEILLE 研究):非干预性回顾性探索性信息流行病学研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 May 2;4:e49335. doi: 10.2196/49335.
7
Disclosure to social network members among abortion-seeking women in low- and middle-income countries with restrictive access: a systematic review.寻求堕胎的中低收入国家的妇女向社交网络成员披露信息:系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jun 7;18(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01165-0.
8
"I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S.“我在潜意识里将恐惧投射到她们身上”:在美国堕胎禁令背景下的避孕护理定性研究
Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 24;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01908-9.
9
Post-abortion care services in Zambian health facilities: a qualitative study of users' experiences and perceptions.赞比亚医疗机构中的流产后护理服务:基于使用者的经验和认知的定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03179-9.
10
Abortion beyond 13 weeks in Argentina: healthcare seeking experiences during self-managed abortion accompanied by the Socorristas en Red.阿根廷 13 周以上的堕胎:由 Red 援助者陪伴的自我管理堕胎期间的医疗保健寻求经历。
Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01488-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Reproductive Safety of Lurasidone and Quetiapine: Update from the National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications.精神药物国家妊娠登记处:鲁拉西酮和喹硫平的生殖安全性更新。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Apr;32(4):452-462. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0310. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Violation of the right to abortion at the time of the war in Ukraine.乌克兰战争时期的堕胎权被侵犯。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022 Sep;33:100738. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100738. Epub 2022 May 27.
3
Abortion in Countries with Restrictive Abortion Laws-Possible Directions and Solutions from the Perspective of Poland.
限制堕胎法国家的堕胎问题——从波兰视角看可能的方向与解决方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;9(11):1594. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111594.
4
The MSBase pregnancy, neonatal outcomes, and women's health registry.MSBase妊娠、新生儿结局及妇女健康登记处。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Apr 12;14:17562864211009104. doi: 10.1177/17562864211009104. eCollection 2021.
5
Abortion knowledge, attitudes and experiences among adolescent girls: a review of the literature.少女堕胎的知识、态度和经验:文献综述。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1744225. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1744225.
6
Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion.自我给药与医护人员给药的药物流产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 9;3(3):CD013181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013181.pub2.
7
Abortion-related worries, fears and preparedness: a Swedish Web-based exploratory and retrospective qualitative study.与堕胎相关的担忧、恐惧和准备情况:一项基于瑞典网络的探索性和回顾性定性研究。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Oct;24(5):380-389. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1647334. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Safe abortion: The public health rationale.安全堕胎:公共卫生的基本原理。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;63:2-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 May 20.
9
Contraception and abortion knowledge, attitudes and practices among adolescents from low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家青少年的避孕与堕胎知识、态度及行为:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):909. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3722-5.
10
The Use of Online Health Forums by Patients With Chronic Cough: Qualitative Study.慢性咳嗽患者对在线健康论坛的使用:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 24;20(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7975.