Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 30;18(1):e0281235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281235. eCollection 2023.
Oral nicotine pouches (NPs) that contain nicotine but no tobacco leaves are rapidly gaining popularity. However, there is limited research on NPs, including within priority populations. In the current study, we examined awareness of, susceptibility to, and use of NPs in young adults as well as comparative risk perceptions with smokeless tobacco.
In 2021, 609 young adults (18-25 years) completed an online survey. Participants reported on NP awareness, susceptibility, and use as well as on comparative product perceptions for NPs versus smokeless tobacco. We ran unadjusted between-groups comparisons and an adjusted multinomial logistic regression to identify relationships between product perceptions and NP susceptibility and use.
41.5% of participants had heard of NPs before. Participants were non-susceptible (66.2%), susceptible (23.5%), or had used NPs (10.3%). Comparative product perceptions between NPs and smokeless tobacco suggested that young adults, as a whole, expressed uncertainty about the relative risk/benefit of using NPs versus smokeless tobacco. However, as expected, unadjusted and adjusted findings indicated that favorable perceptions of NPs versus smokeless tobacco were disproportionately observed among susceptible participants and NP users compared to non-susceptible individuals. Demographic differences were also observed (e.g., NP users were more likely than non-susceptible and susceptible individuals to have used smokeless tobacco).
Young adults reported awareness of, susceptibility to, and use of NPs, with findings indicating that favorable perceptions of NPs versus smokeless tobacco may contribute to NP susceptibility and use beyond known correlates like smokeless tobacco use. However, further research is needed to understand the full range of factors that are associated with NP susceptibility and use. It will be important to disentangle factors that are associated with potential positive public health impacts (e.g., switching from smokeless tobacco to exclusive NP use) from those associated with negative public health impacts (e.g., initiation among nicotine naïve individuals).
含有尼古丁但不含烟叶的口腔尼古丁袋(NPs)正迅速流行起来。然而,关于 NPs 的研究有限,包括在重点人群中。在当前的研究中,我们调查了年轻人对 NPs 的认识、易感性和使用情况,以及与无烟烟草的比较风险认知。
2021 年,609 名年轻成年人(18-25 岁)完成了一项在线调查。参与者报告了对 NPs 的认识、易感性和使用情况,以及对 NPs 与无烟烟草的比较产品认知。我们进行了未调整的组间比较和调整后的多项逻辑回归,以确定产品认知与 NP 易感性和使用之间的关系。
41.5%的参与者之前听说过 NPs。参与者是非易感者(66.2%)、易感者(23.5%)或使用过 NPs(10.3%)。NPs 与无烟烟草之间的比较产品认知表明,作为一个整体,年轻人对使用 NPs 与无烟烟草的相对风险/收益表示不确定。然而,不出所料,未调整和调整后的结果表明,与非易感者相比,对 NPs 与无烟烟草的有利认知在易感参与者和 NP 用户中更为明显。也观察到了人口统计学差异(例如,NP 用户比非易感者和易感者更有可能使用无烟烟草)。
年轻成年人报告了对 NPs 的认识、易感性和使用,研究结果表明,与无烟烟草相比,对 NPs 的有利认知可能导致 NP 易感性和使用,超出了已知的无烟烟草使用等相关因素。然而,需要进一步研究以了解与 NP 易感性和使用相关的所有因素。重要的是要区分与潜在积极公共卫生影响相关的因素(例如,从无烟烟草转为仅使用 NP)与与负面公共卫生影响相关的因素(例如,在尼古丁无知人群中开始使用)。