Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, Leo-Brandt-Str. 5, 52425 Jülich, Germany; Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, Leo-Brandt-Str. 5, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Neuroimage Clin. 2023;37:103331. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103331. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
Previous studies on left hemisphere (LH) stroke patients reported effector-specific (hand, fingers, bucco-facial) differences in imitation performance. Furthermore, imitation performance differed between meaningless (ML) and meaningful (MF) gestures. Recent work suggests that a gesture's meaning impacts the body-part specificity of gesture imitation.
We tested the hypothesis that the gesture's meaning (ML vs MF) affects the lesion correlates of effector-specific imitation deficits (here: bucco-facial vs arm/hand gestures) using behavioural data and support vector regression-based lesion-symptom mapping (SVR-LSM) in a large sample of 194 sub-acute LH stroke patients.
Behavioural data revealed a significant interaction between the effector used for imitation and the meaning of the imitated gesture. SVR-LSM analyses revealed shared lesion correlates for impaired imitation independent of effector or gesture meaning in the left supramarginal (SMG) and superior temporal gyri (STG). Besides, within the territory of the left middle cerebral artery, impaired imitation of bucco-facial gestures was associated with more anterior lesions, while arm/hand imitation deficits were associated with more posterior lesions. MF gestures were specifically associated with lesions in the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left insular region. Notably, an interaction of effector-specificity and gesture meaning was also present at the lesion level: A more pronounced difference in imitation performance between the effectors for ML (versus MF) gestures was associated with left-hemispheric lesions in the STG, SMG, putamen, precentral gyrus and white matter tracts.
The current behavioural data show that ML gestures are particularly sensitive in assessing effector-specific imitation deficits in LH stroke patients. Moreover, a gesture's meaning modulated the effector-specific lesion correlates of bucco-facial and arm/hand gesture imitation. Hence, it is crucial to consider gesture meaning in apraxia assessments.
先前针对左半球(LH)中风患者的研究报告指出,在模仿表现方面存在效应器特异性(手、手指、面-口)差异。此外,无意义(ML)和有意义(MF)手势的模仿表现也存在差异。最近的研究表明,手势的含义会影响手势模仿的身体部位特异性。
我们使用行为数据和基于支持向量回归的病变-症状映射(SVR-LSM),在 194 名亚急性 LH 中风患者的大样本中测试了以下假设:手势的含义(ML 与 MF)会影响效应器特异性模仿缺陷的病变相关性(此处为面-口与臂/手手势)。
行为数据显示,用于模仿的效应器与被模仿手势的含义之间存在显著的相互作用。SVR-LSM 分析显示,在左缘上回(SMG)和颞上回(STG)中,存在与效应器或手势含义无关的、受损模仿的共同病变相关性。此外,在左大脑中动脉的范围内,面-口手势模仿障碍与更靠前的病变相关,而臂/手模仿缺陷与更靠后的病变相关。MF 手势与左额下回和左岛叶区域的病变特别相关。值得注意的是,在病变水平也存在效应器特异性和手势含义的相互作用:ML(而非 MF)手势的模仿表现的效应器特异性差异与 STG、SMG、壳核、中央前回和白质束的左侧半球病变显著相关。
目前的行为数据表明,ML 手势在评估 LH 中风患者的效应器特异性模仿缺陷方面特别敏感。此外,手势的含义会调节面-口和臂/手手势模仿的效应器特异性病变相关性。因此,在失用症评估中考虑手势含义至关重要。